Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the distribution of white spruce (Picea glauca) for Alaska with high accuracy: an open access role-model for predicting tree species in last remaining wilderness areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most wilderness areas still lack accurate distribution information on tree species. We met this need with a predictive GIS modeling approach, using freely available digital data and computer programs to efficiently obtain high-quality species distribution maps. Here we present a digital map with the predicted distribution of white spruce (Picea glauca) in Alaska (4 km resolution, accuracy over 90%). Our presented concept represents a role-model for predicting tree species distribution for remote areas world-wide. Although this model intends to be accurate in making predictions rather than to give detailed biological mechanistic explanations, it can also be used as a baseline for further research and testable hypothesis on the importance of the environmental variables used to build a generalizable model. Further, we emphasize that work like presented here is a pre-condition for assessing human impacts and impacts of climate change on species distribution in a quantitative and transparent fashion, allowing for improved sustainable decision-making world-wide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AGDC:

Alaska Geospatial Data Clearinghouse

CODATA:

Committee on Data for Science and Technology

ESRI:

Environmental Systems Research Institute

FGDC:

Federal Geographic Data Committee

FIA:

Forest inventory and analysis

GIS:

Geographic information system

ICSU:

International Council for Science

IDW:

Inverse distance weighting

IPY:

International Polar Year

NAD83:

North American Datum of 1983

NBII:

National Biological Information Infrastructure

NDVI:

Normalized difference vegetation index

NSF:

National Science Foundation

OA:

Open access

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Collaboration and Development

PRISM:

Parameter-elevation regressions on independent slopes model

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SDM:

Species distribution models

References

  • Araújo MB, Thuiller W, Williams PH, Reginster I (2005) Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry S, Elith J (2006) Error and uncertainty in habitat models. J Appl Ecol 43:413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Modell 157:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley AP (1997) The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognit 30:1145–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Statistical modelling: the two cultures. Statistical Sci 16:199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink CH, Dean FC (1966) Spruce seed as a food of red squirrels and flying squirrels in interior Alaska. J Wildl Manag 30:503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk SW (1984) Seasonal use of resting sites by marten in south-central Alaska. J Wildl Manag 48:950–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calef MP, McGuire AD, Epstein HE, Rupp TS, Shugart HH (2005) Analysis of vegetation distribution in Interior Alaska and sensitivity to climate change using a logistic regression approach. J Biogeogr 32:863–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig E, Huettmann F (2008) Using “blackbox” algorithms such as TreeNet and Random Forests for data-mining and for finding meaningful patterns, relationships and outliers in complex ecological data: an overview, an example using golden eagle satellite data and an outlook for a promising future. In: Hsiao-fan Wang (ed) Intelligent data analysis: developing new methodologies through pattern discovery and recovery. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA

  • Dunning JB Jr, Stewart DJ, Danielson BJ, Noon BR, Root TL, Lamberson RH, Stevens EE (1995) Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecol Appl 5:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, JMcC Overton, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson KS, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberon J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecogr 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L (2004) An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J Appl Ecol 41:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr A, Harris AS (1979) Site index of Sitka Spruce along the Pacific Coast related to latitude and temperatures. For Sci 25:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S, Guisan A (2006) Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. J Appl Ecol 43:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier S, Drielsma M, Manion G, Watson G (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New SouthWales. II. Community-level modelling. Biodivers Conserv 11:2309–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH (2002) What are the appropriate characteristics of an accuracy measure? In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Covelo, CA, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming M (1997) A statewide vegetation map of Alaska using phenological classification of AVHRR data. In: Walker DA, Lillie AC (eds) The second circumpolar arctic vegetation mapping workshop, Arendal, Norway, 18–24 May 1996 and the CAVM-North American Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska, US, 14–16 January 1997. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Boulder, CO, pp 25–26

  • Franklin J (1995) Predictive vegetation mapping: geographical modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Proc Phys Geogr 19:474–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J (1998) Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain-derived variables. J Veg Sci 9:733–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2000) Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Ann Stat 28:337–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant AL, Binnian EF, Omernik JM, Shasby MB (1995) Ecoregions of Alaska US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1567. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Graham CH, Ferrier S, Huettmann F, Moritz C, Peterson AT (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 19:497–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH, Elith J, Hijmans RJ, Guisan A, Peterson AT, Loiselle BA, The Nceas Predicting Species Distributions Working Group (2008) The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. J Appl Ecol 45:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Theurillat J-P, Kienast F (1998) Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. J Veg Sci 9:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Lehmann A, Ferrier S, Austin M, Overton JMcC, Aspinall R, Hastie T (2006) Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions. J Appl Ecol 43:386–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Graham C, Elith J, Huettmann F, NCEAS modelling Group (2007) Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size: insights from an international experiment across five continents. Divers Distrib 13:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennon PE, Trummer LM (2001) Yellow Cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis) at the Northwest Limits of its Natural Range in Prince Williams Sound, Alaska. Northwest Sci 75:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Modell 199:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsten EH, Thier RW, Schmid JM (1991) The sprucebeetle. USDA Forest Service Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 127

  • Huettmann F (2007) Modern adaptive management: adding digital opportunities towards a sustainable world with new values. Forum Public Policy 3:337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Huettmann F, Diamond AW (2001) Seabird colony locations and environmental determination of seabird distribution: a spatially explicit seabird breeding model in the Northwest Atlantic. Ecol Modell 141:261–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E (1968) Flora of Alaska and neighbouring territories: a manual of vascular plants. University Press Stanford, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Working Group on Digital Data (2009) Harnessing the power of digital data for science and society. Report to the Committee on Science of the National Science and Technology Council. Washington DC

  • Juday GP, Barber V, Berg E, Valentine D (1999) Recent dynamics of white spruce treeline forests across Alaska in relation to climate. In: Kankaanpaa S, Tasanen T, Sutinen M-L (eds) Sustainable development in Northern Timberline Forests. Proceedings of the Timberline Workshop, May 10–11, 1998 in Whitehorse, Canada. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers 734, pp 165–187

  • Kadmon R, Farber O, Danin A (2004) Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecol Appl 14:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBau VJ, Alden JN (2000) Unalaska, Alaska: Revisiting North America’s Oldest Afforestation Effort. J For 98:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBau VJ, van Hees WS (1990) An inventory of Alaska’s boreal forests: their extent, condition, and potential use. In: Condition, dynamics, anthropological influences. Proceedings of the International Symposium, 16–26 July, 1990. Archangelsk, Russia. State Forest Committee of the USSR. Part 6, pp 30–39

  • Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP, Blaustein AR (2006) Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Glob Chang Biol 12:1568–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick JR, Whitehead D, McLeod M (1996) Predicting changes in the composition of New Zealand’s indigenous forests in response to global warming: a modelling approach. Environ Softw 11:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCracken JG, Viereck LA (1990) Browse regrowth and use by moose after fire in interior Alaska. Northwest Sci 64:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggini R, Lehmann A, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A (2006) Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. J Biogeogr 33:1729–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Austin MP (1994) Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of data bases. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 344:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masek JG (2001) Stability of Boreal forest stands during recent climate change: evidence from Landsat Satellite Imagery. J Biogeogr 28:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DF (1980) Balsam Poplar in Northern Alaska. Can J Anthropol 1:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of the National Academies (2003) Sharing Publication-related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. The National Academic Press, Washington DC, www.nap.edu

  • Parviainen M, Luoto M, Ryttäri T, Heikkinen RK (2008) Modelling the occurrence of threatened plant species in taiga landscapes: methodological and ecological perspectives. J Biogeogr. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01922.x

  • Pojar J, Mackinnon A (1994) Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Matthews S, Peters M (2007-ongoing) A climate change Atlas for 134 Forest Tree Species of the Eastern United States [database]. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware, OH. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/tree

  • Risenhoover KL (1989) Composition and quality of moose winter diets in interior Alaska. J Wildl Manag 53:568–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp TS, Chapin FS, Starfield AM (2001) Modelling the influence of topographic barriers on treeline advance at the forest-tundra ecotone in northwestern Alaska. Clim Chang 48:399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Jogia MK, Andersen RJ (1988) Camphor from juvenile white spruce as an antifeedant for snowshoe hares. J Chem Ecol 14:1505–1514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slough BD (1989) Movement and habitat use by transplanted marten in the Yukon Territory. J Wildl Manag 53:991–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (1968) Red squirrel responses to spruce cone failure in interior Alaska. J Wildl Manag 32:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT (2002) Controlling bias in biodiversity data. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, pp 537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RS, Anderson KH, Strickland LE, Shafer SL, Pelltier RT, Bartlein PJ (2006) Atlas of relations between climatic parameters and distributions of important trees and shrubs in North America—Alaskan Species and Ecoregions. USGS Professional Paper 1650-D

  • Tsoar A, Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D, Kadmon R (2007) A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. Divers Distrib 13:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleve K, Dyrness CT, Viereck LA, Fox J, Chapin FS III (1983) Taiga ecosystems in interior Alaska. Biosci 33:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Foote JM (1970) The Status of Populus balsamifera and P. trichiocarpa in Alaska. Can Field Nat 84:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Little EL (2007) Alaska trees and shrubs. Snowy Owl Books, Fairbanks

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Van Cleve K, Dyrness CT (1986) Forest ecosystem distribution in the taiga environment. In: Van Cleve K, Chapin FS III, Flanagan PW, Viereck LA, Dyrness CT (eds) Forest ecosystems in the Alaskan taiga. Ecological studies 57. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 22–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. General Technical Report No. 286. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

  • Walker LR, Zasada JC, Chapin FS III (1986) The role of life history processes in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecol 67:1243–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter H (1985) Vegetation of the earth and ecological systems of geobiosphere, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 42:207–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO (1978) Food habits of snowshoe hares in interior Alaska. J Wildl Manag 42:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann NE, Kienast F (1999) Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: species versus community approach. J Veg Sci 10:469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank everybody who helped: Data for model evaluation were kindly supplied by C. Roland (Central Alaska Network Vegetation Monitoring Program, National Park Service), T. Loomis (ABRinc), S. Winslow (University of Alaska, Fairbanks), and K. Winterberger (Pacific Northwest Experiment Station). We furthermore want to thank V. Steen and T. McMillan for fruitful discussions. Of course, we highly appreciate the contributions of the two reviewers, who significantly helped improve this article. Thanks also to the UAF Department of Natural Resources Management, as well as the Department of Biology and Wildlife for providing technical support. B. Ohse wants to thank the Ev. Studienwerk Villigst and the Fulbright Commission for help fund her studies at UAF. This is EWHALE lab publication # 47.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, Grimmer Straße 88, 17489, Greifswald, Germany

    Bettina Ohse

  2. Forest Science Department, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA

    Bettina Ohse & Glenn P. Juday

  3. EWHALE Lab, Biology and Wildlife Department, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7000, USA

    Falk Huettmann

  4. Herbarium and Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Museum of the North, 907 Yukon Dr., PO Box 756960, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-6960, USA

    Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond

Authors
  1. Bettina Ohse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Falk Huettmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Glenn P. Juday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Ohse.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC179 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohse, B., Huettmann, F., Ickert-Bond, S.M. et al. Modeling the distribution of white spruce (Picea glauca) for Alaska with high accuracy: an open access role-model for predicting tree species in last remaining wilderness areas. Polar Biol 32, 1717–1729 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-009-0671-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-009-0671-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation