Abstract
The breeding performance and population trends of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) was studied at Esperanza/Hope Bay, Antarctic Peninsula, by comparing an area with low levels of human disturbance (LLD) and an area with high levels of human disturbance (HLD), close to an Argentine research station. From 1995/1996 to 2004/2005 (except for 1999/2000 and 2003/2004), the following population parameters were measured in both areas: (1) the number of breeding pairs, (2) the number of chicks in creches and (3) the number of chicks produced by breeding pairs. Counts were made for 26 breeding groups situated in the LLD area and 63 breeding groups located in the HLD area. The number of chicks per breeding pair was obtaobtained by following 100 marked nests in each area. All parameters were measured as described in the CCAMLR Monitoring Program protocols. The magnitude and direction (increasing or decreasing) of the changes in breeding population size and the number of chicks creched were similar in both areas. Overall, the number of breeding pairs decreased from 4,744 to 2,968 (37.4%) in the LLD area, and from 8,744 to 5,378 (38.6%) in the HLD area. The number of chicks fledged increased from 3,808 to 4,065 (6.7%) in the LLD area, and decreased from 6,991 to 6,712 (4%) in the HLD area. Breeding success (chicks fledged per marked nest) did not differ significantly between areas for most of the seasons compared. In 1996/1997, breeding success was significantly higher in the HLD area. Our data suggest that environmental influences currently exert greater effects than human disturbance on the penguin population at Esperanza Bay.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acero JM, Agraz JL, Aguirre CA (1991) Análisis del Impacto Ambiental en Bahía Esperanza, Península Antártica. Instituto Antártico Argentino. Special Issue, pp 1–44
Ainley DG, Leresche RE, Sladen WJL (1983) Breeding ecology of the Adélie penguin. University of California Press, Los Angeles, 227 pp
CCAMLR (2003) Standard methods for monitoring parameters of predators species. CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program. CCAMLR, Hobart
Carney KM, Sydeman WJ (1999) A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. Waterbirds 22:68–79
Cobley ND, Shears JR (1999) Breeding performance of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) at a colony exposed to high levels of human disturbance. Polar Biol 21:355–360
Cobley ND, Shears JR, Downie RH (2000) The impact of tourists on Gentoo Penguins at Port Lockroy, Antarctic Peninsula. In: Davison W, Williams CH, Broady P (eds) Antarctic ecosystem: models for wider ecological understanding. Caxton Press, New Zealand, pp 319–323
Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P (1988) Reproductive performance of seabirds and seals at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, 1976–1987: implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In: Sahrhage D (ed) Antarctic Ocean and resource variability. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–285
Culik B, Adelung D, Wolkes AJ (1990) The effect of disturbance on the heart rate and behaviour of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during the breeding season. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic Ecosystem ecological changes and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–182
Enzenbacher DJ (1992) Tourists in Antarctica: numbers and trends. Polar Rec 28(164):17–22
Enzenbacher DJ (1994) Antarctic tourism: an overview of 1992/93 season activities, recent developments and emerging issues. Polar Rec 30:105–116
Fraser WR, Patterson DL (1997) Human disturbance and long term changes in Adélie penguin populations: a natural experiment at Palmer Station, Antarctic Peninsula. In: Battaglia B, Valencia J, Walton DWH (eds) Antarctic communities: species structure and survival. Proceedings of the VI SCAR Biology Symposium. University Press, Cambridge, pp 445–452
Giese M (1996) Effects of human activity on Adélie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biol Conserv 75:157–164
Giese M (1998) Guidelines for people approaching breeding groups of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Polar Rec 34(191):287–292
Giese M, Riddle M (1999) Disturbance of emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri chicks by helicopters. Polar Biol 22:366–371
Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH (1982) The natal and breeding dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162
Holmes ND, Giese M, Achurch H, Robinson S, Kriwoken LK (2006) Behaviour and breeding success of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua in areas of low and high human activity. Polar Biol 29:399–412
Micol T, Jouventin P (2001) Long-term population trends in seven Antarctic seabirds at Pointe Géologie. (Terre Adélie) Human impact compared with environmental change. Polar Biol 24:175–185
Myrcha A, Tatur A, Del Valle R (1987) Numbers of Adélie Penguins breeding at Hope Bay and Seymour Island rookeries (West Antarctica) in 1985. Pol Polar Res 8:411–422
Nisbet IC (2000) Disturbance, habituation, and management of waterbird colonies. Waterbirds 23:312–332
Oelke H (1975) Breeding behaviour and success in a colony of Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae, at Cape Crozier, Antarctica. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The Biology of penguins. Macmillan Press, London, pp 363–395
Patterson DL, Fraser WR (1998) Long-term changes in Adélie penguin populations: human impact or environmental variability? NZ Nat Sci (supplement) 23:147
Patterson DL, Easter-Pilcher AL, Fraser WR (2003) The effects of human activity and environmental variability on long-term changes in Adélie Penguin populations at Palmer Station, Antarctica. In: Huiskes AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Schorno RML, van der Vies SM and Wolff WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context. Proceedings of VIIIth SCAR international biology symposium, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 301–307
Santos M, Carlini AR, Coria NR, Negrete J (2004) Decrease in a population of Adelia penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. In: Proceedings of the V international penguin conference. Ushuaia, Argentina. 5–10 Septiembre, p 70
Sladen JWL (1958) The Pygoscelid penguins. I Methods of study. II The Adèlie penguin. Falkland Islands dependencies survey. Scientific reports 17:97
Spurr EB (1973) Breeding of Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) at Cape Bird. Ibis 117:324–338
Wilson RP, Coria NR, Spairani HJ, Culik BM (1989) Human-induced behaviour in Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Polar Biol 10:77–80
Wilson KL, Taylor RH, Barton KJ (1990) The impact of man on Adélie penguins at Cape Hallet, Antarctica. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems. Ecological change and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–190
Wilson RP, Culik BM, Danefield R, Adelung D (1991) People in Antarctica: how much do Adélies care? Polar Biol 11:363–370
Woehler EJ (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and Subantarctic penguins. SCAR, Cambridge
Woehler EJ, Slip DJ, Robertson LM, Fullagar PJ, Burton HR (1991) The distribution, abundance and status of Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae at the Windmill Island, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Mar Ornithol 19:1–19
Woehler EJ, Penney RL, Creet SM, Burton HR (1994) Impacts of human visitors on breeding success and long-term population trends in Adélie penguins at Casey, Antarctica. Polar Biol 14:269–274
Yorio P, Boersma PD (1992) The effects of human disturbance on Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus behaviour and breeding success. Bird Conserv Int 2:161–173
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to M. Perez Cometo, D. Gaona, G. Blanco, C. MacDermock and D. Archuby for field assistance. We thank the members of Esperanza Station for their logistic support. We also thank Dr. EJ Woehler and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments to improve the manuscript. This work was founded by the Dirección Nacional del Antártico.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlini, A.R., Coria, N.R., Santos, M.M. et al. Breeding success and population trends in Adélie penguins in areas with low and high levels of human disturbance. Polar Biol 30, 917–924 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0251-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0251-1