Polar Biology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 407–413 | Cite as

Measurement of moss growth in continental Antarctica

Original Paper

Abstract

Using steel pins inserted into growing moss colonies near Casey Station, Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica, we have measured the growth rate of three moss species: Bryum pseudotriquetrum and Schistidium antarctici over 20 years and Ceratodon purpureus over 10 years. This has provided the first long-term growth measurements for plants in Antarctica, confirming that moss shoots grow extremely slowly in Antarctica, elongating between 1 and 5 mm per year. Moss growth rates are dependent on availability of water. Antheridia were observed on some stems of B. pseudotriquetrum; no archegonia or sporophytes were observed. Stems bearing antheridia elongated much more slowly than vegetative stems in the same habitat. Two other methods of growth rate measurement were tested, and gave similar rates of elongation over shorter periods of time. However, for long-term measurements, the steel pin measurements proved remarkably reproducible and reliable.

References

  1. Adamson H, Adamson E (1992) Possible effects of global climate change on Antarctic terrestrial vegetation. In: Quilty PG (ed) Impact of climate change Australia Antarctica. AGPS, Canberra, pp 52–62Google Scholar
  2. Clymo RS (1970) The growth of Sphagnum: methods of measurement. J Ecol 58:13–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Green TGA, Schroeter B, Seppelt RD (2000) Effect of temperature, light and ambienet UV on the photosynthesis of the moss Bryum argenteum Hedw. in continental Antarctica. In: Davidson W, Howard-Williams C, Broady P (eds) Antarctic ecosystems: models for wider ecological understanding. New Zealand Natural Sciences, Christchurch, pp165–170Google Scholar
  4. Hughes J, McCully ME (1975) The use of an optical brightener in the study of plant structure. Stain Technol 50:319–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kappen L, Lewis Smith RI, Meyer M (1989) Carbon dioxide exchange of two ecodemes of Schistidium antarctici in continental Antarctica. Polar Biol 9:415–422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis Smith RI (1982) Growth and production in South Georgia bryophytes. Comité National français des Recherches Antarctiques 51:229–239Google Scholar
  7. Lewis Smith RI (1984) Terrestrial plant biology. In: Laws RM (ed) Antarctic ecology. Academic, London, pp 61–162Google Scholar
  8. Lewis Smith RI (1986) Report on Antarctic fieldwork. Plant ecological studies in the fellfield ecosystem near Casey Station, Australian Antarctic Territory, 1985–86. Br Antarct Surv Bull 72:81–91Google Scholar
  9. Lewis Smith RI (1988) Classification and ordination of cryptogamic communities in Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Vegetatio 76:155–166Google Scholar
  10. Lewis Smith RI (1999) Biological and environmental characteristics of three cosmopolitan mosses dominant in continental Antarctica. J Veg Sci 10:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Melick D R, Seppelt RD (1997) Vegetation patterns in relation to climatic and endogenous changes in Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica. J Ecol 85:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Melick DR, Hovenden MJ, Seppelt RD (1994) Phytogeography of bryophyte and lichen vegetation in the Windmill Islands, Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica. Vegetatio 111:71–87Google Scholar
  13. Russell S (1984) Growth measurements in bryophytes: a case study. J Hattori Bot Lab 56:147–157Google Scholar
  14. SCAR (2004) Management plan for Antarctic specially protected area No.135 North–East Bailey Peninsula, Budd Coast, Wilkes Land. Viewed 8 December 2004, http://www.aad.gov.au/MediaLibrary/asset/MediaItems/mI_382306455555556_ASPA%20125%20Bailey%20Management%20Plan.pdf
  15. Schlensog M, Schroeter B (2000) Poikilohydry in Antarctic cryptogams and its influence on photosynthetic performance in mesic and xeric habitats. In: Davidson W, Howard-Williams C, Broady P (eds) Antarctic Ecosystems: Models for Wider Ecological Understanding. New Zealand Natural Sciences, Christchurch, pp175–182Google Scholar
  16. Schroeter B, Kappen L, Green TGA, Seppelt RD (1997) Lichens and the Antarctic environment: effects of temperature and water availability on photosynthesis. In: Lyons WB, Howard-Williams C, Hawes I (eds) Ecosystem processes in Antarctic ice-free landscapes. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp103–107Google Scholar
  17. Selkirk PM, Seppelt RD (1987) Species distribution within a moss bed in Greater Antarctica. Symp Biol Hung 35: 279–284Google Scholar
  18. Seppelt RD, Selkirk PM (1984) Effects of submersion on morphology and the implications of induced environmental modification on the taxonomic interpretation of selected Antarctic moss species. J Hattori Bot Lab 55:273–279Google Scholar
  19. Waaland SD, Waaland JR (1975) Analysis of cell elongation in red algae by fluorescent labelling. Planta 126:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Whinam J, Selkirk PM, Downing AJ, Hull B (2004) Return of the megaherbs: plant colonisation of derelict ANARE Station buildings on sub-Antarctic Heard Island. Polar Rec 40:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson M (1990) Morphology and photosynthetic physiology of Grimmia antarctici from wet and dry habitats. Polar Biol 10:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Ecosystem Dynamics Group, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations