Skip to main content
Log in

Skull morphometry of Pygoscelis (Sphenisciformes): inter and intraspecific variations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological diversity of 47 pygoscelid skulls was tested empirically through geometric morphometrics approach. Using 14 landmarks, shape is analyzed independently of other aspects of the body form. The shape disparity within and between the three living species of Pygoscelis is explored as well as how the structure of the skull is related to food preferences. Comparison of the three mean configurations of the species suggests that differences among groups are small relative to the variability within each group. However, some differences at the posterior portion of the braincase are indicated. Sexual dimorphism within each species is not noticeable. Comparison with a piscivorous species (Spheniscus humboldti) shows two cranial patterns: pygoscelid type with wide nasal gland depression limited by well-marked edges, shallow temporal fossae, and a poorly developed temporal nuchal crest; the second type represented by Spheniscus humboldti with laterally open nasal gland depression, deep temporal fossae, and a well-developed temporal nuchal crest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbosa A, Moreno E (1999) Hindlimb morphology and locomotor performance in waders. An evolutionary approach. Biol J Linn Soc 67:313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli S, Giannini N (2005) A phylogeny of extant penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes) combining morphology and mitochondrial sequences. Cladistics 21:209–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein FL (1996) Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull Math Biol 58:313–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bost CA, Georges JY, Guinet C, Cherel Y, Puetz K, Charrassin JB, Handrich Y, Zorn T, Lage J, Le Maho Y (1997) Foraging habitat and food intake of satellite-tracked king penguins during the austral summer at Crozet Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 150:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen AP, Arkhipkin AI, Laptikhovsky VV, Huin N (2005) What is out there: diversity in feeding of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) around the Falkland Island (South West Atlantic). Polar Biol 8:653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason D, Millar CD, Cree A, Halverson J, Lambert DM (2001) The Takahe (Porphyrio mantelli): a comparison of five methods for avian sex assignment. J Zool 253:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannini NP, Bertelli S (2004) Phylogeny of extant penguins based on integumentary and breeding characters. Auk 121:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TM, Kram R (2000) Penguin wadding not wasteful. Nature 408:929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knowies K, Agnew D, Clarke J, Else G (1992) Use of morphometric parameters for the determination of sex of Adelie penguins. Wildl Res 19:657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooyman GL, Cherel Y, Le Maho Y, Croxall JP, Thorson PH, Ridoux V, Kooyman CA (1992) Diving behavior and energetics during foraging cycles in king penguins. Ecol Monogr 62:143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez I (1992) Order Sphenisciformes. In: del Hoyo J, Elliott y A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 1. Ostrich to Ducks. Links ediciones, Barcelona, pp 140–160

  • Pinshow B, Fedack MA, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1976) Terrestrial locomotion in penguins: it costs more to waddle. Science 195:592–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pycraft WP (1898) Contributions to the osteology of birds, part II. Impennes. Proc Zool Soc Lond: 958–989

  • Rabello Monteiro L, Furtado dos Reis S (1999) Princípios de morfometria geométrica. Holos editora, Ribeiro Preto, 198 pp

  • Rohlf FJ (2005) tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.04. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook

  • Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scolaro JA (1987) Sexing fledglings and yearlings of Magellanic penguins by discriminant analysis of morphometric parameters. Colonial Waterbirds 10:50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan AN, Darby JT, David L (2004) The use of morphometric measurements to sex yellow-eyed penguins. Waterbirds 27:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slice DE (1994–1998) Morpheus et al.: software for morphometric research. Revision 01-30-98. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook

  • Small CG (1996) The statistical theory of shape. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 227 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1995) The penguins. Spheniscidae. Birds families of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 295 pp

  • Woehler EJ (1993) The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and subantarctic penguins. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. University of Cambridge, 76 pp

  • Zusi RL (1975) An interpretation of skull structure in penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. Macmillan Press, London, pp 59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Zusi RL (1993) Patterns of diversity in the avian skull. In: Hanken J, Hall B (eds) The skull. vol 2. Patterns of structural and systematic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 391–437

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Paula González for valuable help concerning to data processing; to Diego Montalti for access to materials of Instituto Antártico Argentino and his useful data, to Esteban Soibelzon and Martín Ciancio for information on pygoscelid habits. To an anonymous reviewer and specially, to Stig Walsh for improving our English and his useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Acosta Hospitaleche.

Appendix: materials used in the morphometric analyses performed

Appendix: materials used in the morphometric analyses performed

P. adeliae: MLP 32, MLP 33, MLP 415, MLP 416, MLP 417, MLP 418, MLP 419, MLP 420, MLP 421, MLP 422, MLP 423, MLP 424, MLP 425, MLP 426, MLP 427, MLP 428, MLP 429, MLP 430, MLP 431, MLP 432, MLP 433, MLP 434. Pygoscelis antarctica: IAA 54, IAA 65, IAA 76, IAA 157, IAA 158, MLP 435, MLP 436, MLP 437, MLP 438, MLP 439, MLP 440, MLP 441, MLP 442, MLP 443, MLP 444, MLP 447. Pygoscelis papua: IAA 24, IAA 81, IAA 82, IAA 88, IAA 160, MLP 449, MLP 451, MLP 463, MLP 468. Spheniscus humboldti: MLP 686.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acosta Hospitaleche, C., Tambussi, C. Skull morphometry of Pygoscelis (Sphenisciformes): inter and intraspecific variations. Polar Biol 29, 728–734 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0109-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0109-6

Keywords

Navigation