Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The moss dwelling testacean fauna of Île de la Possession

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ecological study of the moss dwelling testacean fauna (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) on Île de la Possession (Crozet Archipelago, sub-Antarctica) revealed 83 taxa, belonging to 21 genera. The moss flora was dominated by cosmopolitan and ubiquitous taxa, such as Trinema lineare, T. enchelys, Euglypha laevis and E. rotunda. A cluster analysis and a correspondence analysis identified three communities: (1) a Corythion dubium assemblage found in a drier, slightly acidic terrestrial moss vegetation, (2) the Arcella arenaria, and (3) the Difflugiella crenulata assemblages, both characteristic of wetter, circumneutral habitats. The latter typified submerged mosses growing in running water, while the A. arenaria assemblage seemed to prefer mosses in standing waterbodies. Moisture conditions appeared to play a key role in determining the distribution pattern of testacean communities, while pH was only a secondary factor. A logistic regression emphasised the effect of the habitat type in controlling the variance in testacean assemblages. Moreover, the close relationship between bryophyte species and habitat type had a significant influence on the distribution pattern of the testate amoebae. Weighted averaging and calibration were used to estimate moisture optima and tolerances of the testate amoebae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–e
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyens L, Chardez D (1984) Testate amoebae (Rhizopoda, Testaceae) from south-west Ireland. Arch Protistenkd 128:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens L, Chardez D, De Landtsheer R, De Bock P, Jacques E (1986) Testate amoebae populations from moss and lichen habitats in the Arctic. Polar Biol 5:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens L, Chardez D, De Baere D, De Bock P, Jacques E (1990) Ecology of terrestrial testate amoebae assemblages from coastal lowlands on Devon island (NWT, Canadian Arctic). Polar Biol 10:431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens L, Chardez D, De Baere D, De Bock P (1992) The testate amoebae from the Sondre Stromfjord region (West-Greenland): their biogeographic implications. Arch Protistenkd 142:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens L, Chardez D, De Baere D, Verbruggen C (1995) The aquatic testate amoebae fauna of the Strømness Bay area, South Georgia. Antarct Sci 7:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks HJB, Line JM, Juggins S, Stevenson AC, ter Braak CJF (1990) Diatoms and pH reconstruction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 327:263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet L (1981) Thécamoebiens (Rhizopoda, Testacea). CNFRA Biol Sols 48:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF ter (1990) CANOCO: a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF ter, Prentice IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 18:271–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CFJ ter, Smilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to canoco for windows. Software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Centre for biometry, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF ter, Van Dam H (1989) Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia 178:209–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Chardez D, Beyens L, Bock P (1987) Thécamoebiens de Campine (Protozoa Rhizopoda Testacea). Bull Rech Agron Gembloux 22:285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Charman DJ, Warner BG (1992) Relationship between testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) and microenvironmental parameters on a forested peatland in north-eastern Ontario. Can J Zool 70:2474–2482

    Google Scholar 

  • Charman DJ, Hendon D, Woodland WA (2000) The identification of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in peats. Quat Res Ass Technical Guide 9:1–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1975) Ecology and evolution of communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Towards a theory of continental species diversity bird distributions over Mediterranean habitat gradients. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 214–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA (1973) An illustrated introduction to the testate rhizopods in Sphagnum, with special reference to the area around Malham Tarn, Yorkshire. Field Stud 3:801–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Costan G, Planas D (1986) Effects of a short-term experimental acidification on a microinvertebrate community: Rhizopoda, Testacea. Can J Zool 64:1224–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastych H (1988) The tardigrada of Poland. Monografie Fauny Polski. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, Krakow, p 255

  • Decloître L (1962) Le genre Euglypha Dujardin. Arch Protistenkd 106:51–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Decloître L (1978) Le genre Centropyxis I. Compléments à jour au 31 décembre 1974 de la Monographie du genre parue en 1929. Arch Protistenkd 120:63–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Decloître L (1979) Le genre Centropyxis II. Compléments à jour au 31 décembre 1974 de la Monographie du genre parue en 1929. Arch Protistenkd 121:162–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Decloître L (1981) Le genre Trinema Dujardin, 1841. Révision à jour au 31 décembre 1979. Arch Protistenkd 124:193–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflandre G (1928) Le genre Arcella. Arch Protistenkd 64:152–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflandre G (1929) Le genre Centropyxis. Arch Protistenkd 67:322–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Deflandre G (1936) Etude monographique sur le genre Nebela Leidy. Ann Protistol 5:201–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison R (1995) Paleolimnological analysis of Ullswater using testate amoebae. J Paleolimnol 13:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Foissner W (1987) Soil protozoa: fundamental problems, ecological significance, adaptation in ciliates and testaceans, bioindicators and guide to the literature. Prog Protozool 2:69–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenot Y (1986) Interactions entre la faune lombricienne et les systèmes édaphiques d’une île subantarctique, Ile de la Possession, Archipel Crozet. Thesis, University of Rennes

  • Gremmen NJM (1981) The vegetation of the subantarctic islands Marion and Prince Edward. Junk, The Hague, pp 149

  • Grospietsch T (1964) Die Gattungen Cryptodifflugia und Difflugiella (Rhizopoda, Testacea). Zool Anz 172:243–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Grospietsch T (1971) Rhizopoda. Beitrag zur Ökologie der testaceen Rhizopoden von Marion Island. In: Van Zinderen Bakker EM, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands. Balkema, Cape Town, pp 411–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RI, Smol JP (1996) Paleolimnological assessment of long-term water quality changes in south-central Ontario lakes affected by cottage development and acidification. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal OW (1962) The abundance and micro-distribution of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda: Testacea) in sphagnum. Oikos 13:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal OW (1964) Observations on the seasonal and spatial distribution of Testacea (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in sphagnum. J Anim Ecol 33:395–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébrard JP (1970) Muscines récoltées aux îles Kerguelen et Crozet pendant la campagne d’été des Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises (1969). Rev Bryol Lichenol 37:135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenraad HR, de Groot AA (1940) Zoetwaterrhizopoden en—heliozoën. In: Boschma H (ed) Fauna van Nederland IX. Leiden, pp 303

    Google Scholar 

  • Jersabek CD (1995) Distribution and ecology of rotifer communities from high-altitude alpine sites—a multivariate approach. Dev Hydrobiol Rotifera 7:75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RH, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1987) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RH, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Juggins S (2003) C2 Software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualization. User Guide Version 1.3. University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K.

  • Jung W (1936) Thekamöben ursprünglicher, lebender deutscher Hochmoore. Abh Landesmus Provinz Westfalen Mus Naturkd 7:1–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin IM (1994) The biology of tardigrades. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach Computing Services (2002) Multivariate statistical package version 3.1 users’ manual. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Longton RE (1988) Biology of polar bryophytes and lichens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Medioli F, Scott D (1988) Lacustrine Thecamoebians (mainly Arcellaceans) as potential tools for paleolimnological interpretations. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol 62:361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisterfeld R (1977) Die horizontale und vertikale Verteilung der Testaceen (Rhizopoden, Testacea) in Sphagnum. Arch Hydrobiol 79:319–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe SE (1988) Modern diatom assemblages in Central Mexico: the role of water chemistry and other environmental factors as indicated by TWINSPAN and DECORANA. Freshw Biol 19:217–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell EAD, Buttler AJ, Warner BG, Gobat JM (1999) Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in Sphagnum peatlands in the Jura mountains, Switserland and France. Ecoscience 6:565–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell EAD, Borcard D, Buttler AJ, Grosvernier P, Gilbert D, Gobat JM (2000a) Horizontal distribution patterns of testate amoebae (Protozoa) in a Sphagnum magellanicum carpet. Microb Ecol 39:290–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell EAD, Buttler A, Grosvernier P, Rydin H, Albinsson, Greenup UL, Heijmans MMPD, Hoosbeek MR, Saarinen T (2000b) Relationships among testate amoebae (Protozoa), vegetation and water chemistry in five Sphagnum-dominated peatlands. New Phytol 145:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen D, Rousseau R, Van Hecke P (1998) The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses 13:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochyra R (1998) The moss flora of King George Island, Antarctica. Polish Academy of Sciences, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Cracow, p 278

  • Ogden CG (1983) Observations on the systematics of the genus Difflugia in Britain (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zool Ser 44:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden CG, Hedley RH (1980) An atlas of freshwater testate amoebae. British Museum, Natural History, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Opravilova V, Zahradkova S (2003) Some information of the testate amoebae of Iceland. Limnologica 33:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler B (1995) Relation to habitat in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 313/314:267-278

    Google Scholar 

  • Putzke J, Pereira AB (2001) The Antarctic mosses. With special attention to the South Shetland Islands. Editora Da Ulbra, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Richters F (1907) Die Fauna der Moosrasen der Gaussbergs und einiger südlicher Inseln. Dtsche Südpol Expedition 9:259–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn W (1962) Die Ökologie der Testaceen des Krottensees (Salzburg, Österreich). Limnologica 14:49–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn W (1966) Testaceen als Bioindikatoren im System der Seentypen Untersuchungen in masurischen Seen und im Suwalki-Gebiet (Polen). Limnologica 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn W (1981) Population dynamics and production of Testacea (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in the river Saale. Zool Jahrb Syst 108:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn W (1982) Die Produktion an Gehäuse-Protozoen in der Ilm. Limnologica 14:347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn W (1992) The role of protozoan communities in freshwater and soil ecosystems. Acta Protozool 31:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG (1975) Protozoaires terricoles de l’Ile de la Possession. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 12:523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG (1982) The terrestrial Protozoan fauna of South Georgia. Polar Biol 1:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG (1992) Distribution and ecology of testate rhizopod fauna of the continental Antarctic zone. Polar Biol 12:629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse B (1982) La zonation écologique sous les hautes latitudes australes. CNFRA 51:532–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolonen K (1986) Rhizopod analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of holocene paleoecology and paleohydrology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 645–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolonen K, Warner BG, Vasander H (1994) Ecology of testaceans (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in mires in southern Finland: II. Multivariate analysis. Arch Protistenkd 144:97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver B, Beyens L (1999) Freshwater diatoms from Ile de la Possession (Crozet Archipelago, sub-Antarctica): an ecological assessment. Polar Biol 22:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver B, Ledeganck P, Beyens L (2001) Habitat preferences in freshwater diatom communities from sub-Antarctic Îles Kerguelen. Antarct Sci 13:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerckvoorde A, Trappeniers K, Chardez D, Nijs I, Beyens L (2000) Testate amoebae communities from terrestrial moss habitats in the Zackenberg Area (North-East Greenland). Acta Protozool 39:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zanten BO (1971) Musci. In: van Zinderen Bakker EM Sr, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands. Balkema, Capetown, pp 173–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke S, Ledeganck P, Beyens L, Van de Vijver B (2004a) Soil testate amoebae from sub-Antarctic Îles Crozet. Antarct Sci 16:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke S, Beyens L, Van de Vijver B (2004b) Freshwater testate amoebae communities from Ile de la Possession (Crozet Archipelago, sub-Antarctica). Arct Antarct Alp Res (in press)

  • Warner BG (1987) Abundance and diversity of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda, Testacea) in Sphagnum peatlands in south-western Ontario, Canada. Arch Protistenkd 133:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner BG, Charman DJ (1994) Holocene moisture changes on a peatland in northwestern Ontario based on fossil testate amoebae (Protozoa) analysis. Boreas 23:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland WA, Charman DJ, Sims PC (1998) Quantitative estimates of water tables and soil moisture in Holocene peatlands from testate amoebae. Holocene 8:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The sampling was made possible by the logistic and financial support of the French Polar Institute in the frame of the Terrestrial Program 136 (Dr. Yves Frenot and Ir. M. Lebouvier, Université de Rennes, France). Additional funding was provided by the Science Foundation, Flanders (FWO). Prof. Dr. W.H. De Smet is acknowledged for his help during sampling. Bart Van de Vijver is post-doctoral researcher at the FWO, Flanders. Prof. Dr. Stefan Van Dongen is thanked for his help with the logistic regression analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofie Vincke.

Appendix

Appendix

List of all observed testate amoebae taxa, including abbreviations used in text and figures. The taxon’s frequency of appearance (%) is also added

ARCARE

Arcella arenaria Greeff

3.99

ARCDIS

Arcella discoides Ehrenberg

0.01

ARCHS1

Archerella sp1

0.08

ASSMUS

Assulina muscorum Greeff

1.06

ASSSEM

Assulina seminulum Penard

0.03

ASSSP1

Assulina sp1

0.63

CENACT

Centropyxis aculeata Stein

0.01

CENAER

Centropyxis aerophila Deflandre

1.55

CENASP

Centropyxis aerophila vas sphagnicola Deflandre

0.11

CENASY

Centropyxis aerophila vas sylvatica Deflandre

0.05

CENCAS

Centropyxis cassis Deflandre

0.01

CENDEF

Centropyxis deflandriana Bonnet

0.01

CENHIR

Centropyxis hirsuta Deflandre

0.01

CORDUB

Corythion dubium Taranek

7.89

CRYCOM

Cryptodifflugia compressa Penard

4.08

CYCSP1

Cyclopyxis sp1

0.05

CYCSP2

Cyclopyxis sp2

0.01

CYPSP1

Cyphoderia sp1

0.95

DIFAMP

Difflugia ampullula Playfair

0.01

DIFBAC

Difflugia bacillifera Penard

0.07

DIFBRY

Difflugia bryophila Jung

0.11

DIFCLU

Difflugia cfr. lucida

0.01

DIFGLA

Difflugia globulosa Dujardin

0.08

DIFGLO

Difflugia globulus Hopkinson

0.28

DIFLUC

Difflugia lucida Penard

0.14

DIFMIN

Difflugia minutissima Penard

0.02

DIFPRI

Difflugia pristis Penard

1.31

DIFPUL

Difflugia pulex Penard

0.73

DIFSP3

Difflugia sp3

0.10

DIFSP4

Difflugia sp4

0.02

DIFSP5

Difflugia sp5

0.48

DIFSP6

Difflugia sp6

0.01

DIFSP7

Difflugia sp7

0.01

DIFSP8

Difflugia sp8

1.15

DIFSP9

Difflugia sp9

0.09

DIFSP10

Difflugia sp10

0.01

DIFSP11

Difflugia sp11

0.07

DIFTEN

Difflugia tenuis (Penard) Chardez

0.42

DLACRE

Difflugiella crenulata Playfair

8.79

DLACRG

Difflugiella crenulata var. globosa Playfair

0.04

DLAMIN

Difflugiella minuta Playfair

0.05

DLAOVI

Difflugiella oviformis (Penard) Bonnet and Thomas

1.91

DLAOVF

Difflugiella oviformis var. fusca (Penard) Bonnet and Thomas

0.94

DLAPUS

Difflugiella pusilla Playfair

0.04

DLASAC

Difflugiella sacculus (Penard) Deflandre

0.03

DLASP3

Difflugiella sp3

0.03

EDACAM

Edaphonobiotus campascoides Schönborn. Foissner and Meisterfeld

0.18

EUGBRY

Euglypha bryophila Brown

0.01

EUGCIL

Euglypha ciliata (Ehrenberg) Perty

0.35

EUGCIG

Euglypha ciliata var. glabra Wailes

0.30

EUGCOM

Euglypha compressa Carter

0.05

EUGCOG

Euglypha compressa var. glabra Cash

0.03

EUGCRI

Euglypha cristata Leidy

0.38

EUGFIL

Euglypha filifera Penard

0.32

EUGLAE

Euglypha laevis Perty

0.03

EUGPOL

Euglypha polylepis Bonnet

4.78

EUGROT

Euglypha rotunda Wailes

0.59

EUGSP1

Euglypha sp1

5.44

EUGSP2

Euglypha sp2

0.01

EUGSP3

Euglypha sp3

0.12

EUGSP4

Euglypha sp4

0.01

EUGSTR

Euglypha strigosa Leidy

0.56

EUGTUB

Euglypha tuberculata Dujardin

0.16

EUGTUM

Euglypha tuberculata var. minor Taranek

0.01

HELSYL

Heleopera sylvatica Penard

0.20

HYASP1

Hyalosphenia sp1

0.06

HYASP2

Hyalosphenia sp2

0.03

HYASP3

Hyalosphenia sp3

0.02

HYASP4

Hyalosphenia sp4

0.01

MICPAT

Microchlamys patella (Claparede and Lachmann) Cockerell

1.58

NEBDEN

Nebela dentistoma Penard

0.07

NEBTUB

Nebela tubulata Brown

0.03

NEBVAS

Nebela vas Certes

0.46

NEBWAI

Nebela wailesi Deflandre

0.04

PARIRR

Paraquadrula irregularis Deflandre

0.13

PHRPAR

Phryganella paradoxa Penard

0.02

PSEFUL

Pseudodifflugia fulva Penard

2.07

PSEGRA

Pseudodifflugia gracilis Schlumberger

0.04

TRAACO

Tracheleuglypha acolla Bonnet and Thomas

0.02

TRADEN

Tracheleuglypha dentata (Vejdovsky) Deflandre

1.87

TRACOR

Trachelocorythion pulchellum (Penard) Bonnet

0.96

TRIENC

Trinema enchelys Leidy

11.79

TRILIN

Trinema lineare Penard

29.79

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincke, S., Gremmen, N., Beyens, L. et al. The moss dwelling testacean fauna of Île de la Possession. Polar Biol 27, 753–766 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0655-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0655-8

Keywords

Navigation