Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 711–720 | Cite as

The breeding biology and factors affecting reproductive success in rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome at Macquarie Island

  • Cindy L. Hull
  • Mark Hindell
  • Kirsten Le Mar
  • Paul Scofield
  • Jane Wilson
  • Mary-Anne Lea
Original Paper

Abstract

Adult mass changes, egg morphometrics, chick growth rates, fledging masses, reproductive success and reasons for reproductive failure were examined in rockhopper penguins at Macquarie Island from 1993/1994 to 1995/1996. Mean arrival masses, growth rates of chicks and fledging masses exhibited inter-annual variability, while egg morphometrics, hatching success (68.0±6.0%) and reproductive success (47.3±8.3%) were constant between years. Reproductive failures occurred primarily during incubation, with the majority of eggs lost to great skuas. Logistic regressions revealed that no variable significantly explained hatching success, and only in 1994/1995 was fledging success significantly correlated with the position of nest in the colony (those in the centre were more successful than those on the periphery). Reproductive success during this study was relatively high, and therefore an assessment during poor years would be instructive, particularly in relation to aspects of the penguins’ foraging ecology.

Keywords

Reproductive Success Breeding Season Falkland Island King Penguin Nest Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Melissa Giese and Di Moyle for valuable comments on drafts of the manuscript, and the Antarctic Scientific Advisory Committee, the SeaWorld Research and Rescue Foundation and the Trans-Antarctic Association for their financial support. Work was carried out under Macquarie Island special permits MI/34/94, MI/3/95 and MI/13/96.

References

  1. Ainley DG, LeResche RE Sladen WJL (1983) Breeding biology of the Adélie Penguin. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainley DG, Carter HR, Anderson DW, Briggs KT, Coulter MC, Cruz F, Cruz JB, Valle CA, Fefer SI, Hatch SA, Schreiber EA, Schreiber RW, Smith NG (1988) Effects of the 1982–83 El Niño Southern Oscillation on Pacific bird populations. In: Ouellet H (ed) Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Ottawa University Press, Ottawa, pp 1747–1758Google Scholar
  3. Ashmole NP (1971) Sea bird ecology and the marine environment. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian Biology, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 223–286Google Scholar
  4. Barbosa A, Moreno J, Potti J, Merino S (1997) Breeding group size, nest position and breeding success in the chinstrap penguin. Polar Biol 18:410–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boersma PD, Stokes DL, Yorio PM (1990) Reproductive variability and historical change of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at Punta Tombo, Argentina. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, London, pp 15–43Google Scholar
  6. Bost CA, Jouventin P (1991) The breeding performance of the Gentoo Penguin Pygoscelis papua at the northern edge of its range. Ibis 133:14–25Google Scholar
  7. Brown CR (1988) Egg temperature and embryonic metabolism of A- and B-eggs of macaroni and rockhopper penguins. S Afr J Zool 23:166–172Google Scholar
  8. Brown CR, Klages NT (1987) Seasonal and annual variation in diets of Macaroni (Eudyptes chrysolophus chrysolophus) and Southern Rockhopper (E. chrysocome chrysocome) Penguins at sub-Antarctic Marion Island. J Zool Lond 212:7–28Google Scholar
  9. Carrick R, Ingham SE (1970) Ecology and population dynamics of Antarctic sea birds. In: Holdgate MW (ed) Antarctic ecology, vol 1. Academic, London, pp 505–525Google Scholar
  10. Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1993) High annual variability in reproductive success and survival of an Antarctic seabird, the snow petrel Pagodroma nivea. Oecologia 94:278–285Google Scholar
  11. Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1995) Body conditions and seabird reproductive performance: a study of three petrel species. Ecology 76:2240–2246Google Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulson JC (1968) Differences in the quality of birds nesting in the centre and on the edge of a colony. Nature 217:478–479Google Scholar
  14. Coulson JC (1984) The population dynamic of the eider duck Somateria mollissima and evidence of extensisve non-breeding by adult ducks. Ibis 126:525–543Google Scholar
  15. Crawford RJM, Dyer BM (1995) Responses by four seabird species to a fluctuating availability of Cape Anchovy Engraulis capensis off South Africa. Ibis 137:329–339Google Scholar
  16. Croxall JP, Prince PA (1980) Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biol J Linn Soc 4:103–131Google Scholar
  17. Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P (1988) Reproductive performance of seals and seabirds at South Georgia and Signy Islands, South Orkney Islands, 1976–1987: implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In: Sahrhage D (ed) Antarctic ocean and resource variability. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 261–285Google Scholar
  18. Croxall JP, Reid K, Prince PA (1999) Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:115–131Google Scholar
  19. Culik BM (1994) Energy requirements of pygoscelid penguins: a synopsis. Reports on polar research. Ber Polarforsch p 150Google Scholar
  20. Cunningham DM, Moors PJ (1994) The decline of Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome at Campbell Island, Southern Ocean and the influence of rising sea temperatures. Emu 94:27–36Google Scholar
  21. Dann P, Cullen JM (1990) Survival patterns of reproduction, and lifetime reproductive output in Little Blue Penguins (Eudyptula minor) on Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, London, pp 63–84Google Scholar
  22. Dann P, Cullen JM, Jessop R (1995) Cost of reproduction in Little Penguins. In: Dann P, Norman I, Reilly P (eds) The penguin: ecology and management. Surrey Beatty, Melbourne, pp 40–55Google Scholar
  23. Davis RW, Croxall JP, O’Connell MJ (1989) The reproductive energetics of gentoo Pygoscelis papua and macaroni Eudyptes chrysolophus penguins at South Georgia. J Anim Ecol 58:59–74Google Scholar
  24. Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252Google Scholar
  25. Edge K-A, Jamieson IG, Darby JT (1999) Parental investment and the management of an endangered penguin. Biol Conserv 88:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellis S, Croxall JP, Cooper J (1998) Penguin Conservation Assessment and Management Plan. Report. IUCN/SSC conservation breeding specialist group, Apple ValleyGoogle Scholar
  27. Emslie SD, Karnovsky N, Trivelpiece W (1995) Avian predation at penguin colonies on King George Island, Antarctica. Wilson Bull 107:317–327Google Scholar
  28. Frere E, Gandini P, Boersma PD (1992) Effects of nest type and location on reproductive success of the Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus. Mar Ornithol 20:1–6Google Scholar
  29. Green B, Gales RP (1990) Water, sodium, and energy turnover in free-living penguins. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 245–268Google Scholar
  30. Guinet C, Chastel O, Koudil M, Durbec JP, Jouventin P (1998) Effects of warm sea-surface temperature anomalies on the blue petrel at the Kerguelen Islands. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gwynn AM (1953) The egg-laying and incubation periods of Rockhopper, Macaroni and Gentoo Penguins. Aust Natl Antarct Res Exped Rep B 1:1–29Google Scholar
  32. Hamer KC, Furness RW, Caldow RWG (1991) The effects of changes in food availability on the breeding ecology of great skuas Catharacta skua in Shetland. J Zool Lond 223:75–188Google Scholar
  33. Heath RGM, Randall RM (1985) Growth of Jackass penguin chicks (Spheniscus demersus) hand reared on different diets. J Zool Lond 205:91–105Google Scholar
  34. Hindell MA, Robertson GG, Williams R (1995) Resource partitioning in four species of sympatrically breeding penguins. In: Dann P, Norman I, Reilly P (eds) The Penguins, ecology and management. Surrey Beatty, Melbourne, pp 196–215Google Scholar
  35. Hull CL (1996) Morphometric indices for sexing adult Royal, Eudyptes schlegeli, and Rockhopper Penguins, E. chrysocome, at Macquarie Island. Mar Ornithol 24:23–27Google Scholar
  36. Hull CL (1997) The comparative foraging ecology of Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper E. chrysocome Penguins. PhD Thesis, School of Zoology, University of TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
  37. Hull CL (1999a) Comparison of the diets of breeding Royal Eudyptes schlegeli and Rockhopper E. chrysocome Penguins at Macquarie Island over three years. J Zool Lond 247:507–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hull CL (1999b) The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E. chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison. Aust Wildl Res 26:789–803Google Scholar
  39. Hull CL (2000) Comparative diving behaviour and segregation of the marine habitat by breeding Royal Penguins, Eudyptes schlegeli, and eastern Rockhopper Penguins, Eudyptes chrysocome filholi, at Macquarie Island. Can J Zool 78:333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hull CL, Wilson J (1996) The effect of investigators on the breeding success of Royal, Eudyptes schlegeli, and Rockhopper, E. chrysocome, Penguins at Macquarie Island. Polar Biol 16:335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiguet F, Jouventin P (1999) Individual breeding decisions and long-term reproductive strategy in the King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus. Ibis 141:428–433Google Scholar
  42. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Lamey TC (1993) Territorial aggression, timing of egg loss, and egg-size differences in Rockhopper Penguin, Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome, on New Island, Falkland Islands. Oikos 66:293–297Google Scholar
  44. Liddle GM (1994) Interannual variation in the breeding biology of the Antarctic prion Pachyptila desolata at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Zool Lond 234:125–139Google Scholar
  45. Marchant S, Higgins PJ (1990) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds, vol 1. Ratites to ducks. Part A: ratites to petrels. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  46. Murphy EC, Shauer JH (1996) Synchrony in egg-laying and reproductive success of neighbouring common murres, Uria aalge. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ollason JC, Durnett GM (1988) Variation in breeding success in Fulmars. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 263–278Google Scholar
  48. Olsson O (1997) Effects of food availability on fledging condition and post-fledging survival in king penguin chicks. Polar Biol 18:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pütz K, Ingham RJ, Smith JG, Croxall JP (2001) Population trends, breeding success and diet composition of gentoo Pygoscelis papua, magellanic Spheniscus magellanicus and rockhopper Eudyptes chrysocome penguins in the Falkland Islands. Polar Biol 24:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reilly PN, Cullen JM (1981) The Little Penguin Eudyptula minor in Victoria. II: breeding. Emu 81:1–19Google Scholar
  51. Ricketts C, Prince PA (1981) Comparison of growth of albatrosses. Ornis Scand 12:120–124Google Scholar
  52. Ricklefs RE (1983) Some consideration on the reproductive energetics of pelagic seabirds. Stud Avian Biol 8:84–94Google Scholar
  53. St Clair CC, St Clair RC (1996) Causes and consequences of egg loss in rockhopper penguins, Eudyptes chrysocome. Oikos 77:459–466Google Scholar
  54. Slagsvold T, Sandvick J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen O, Husby M (1984) On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk 101:685–697Google Scholar
  55. Thomas CS, Coulson JC (1988) Reproductive success of Kittiwake Gulls, Rissa tridactyla. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 251–262Google Scholar
  56. Thompson KR (1993) Variation in Magellanic Penguin Speniscus magellanicus diet in the Falkland Islands. Mar Ornithol 21:57–67Google Scholar
  57. Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Volkman NJ, Ware SH (1983) Breeding and feeding ecologies of pygoscelid penguins. Antarct J US 18:209–210Google Scholar
  58. van Heezik Y, Davis L (1990) Effects of food variability on growth rates, fledging sizes and reproductive success in the Yellow-eyed Penguin Megadyptes antipodes. Ibis 132:354–365Google Scholar
  59. Warham J (1963) The Rockhopper Penguin, Eudyptes chrysocome, at Macquarie Island. Auk 80:229–256Google Scholar
  60. Warham J (1972) Breeding seasons and sexual dimorphism in Rockhopper Penguins. Auk 89:86–105Google Scholar
  61. Warham J (1975) The crested penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. MacMillan, London, pp 189–269Google Scholar
  62. Watanuki Y, Kato A, Mori Y, Naito Y (1993) Diving performance of Adélie penguins in relation to food availability in fast sea-ice areas: comparisons between years. J Anim Ecol 62:634–646Google Scholar
  63. Weimerskirch H, Chastel O, Ackermann L (1995) Adjustment of parental effort to manipulated foraging ability in a pelagic seabird, the thin-billed prion Pachyptila belcheri. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White WB, Peterson RG (1996) An Antarctic circumpolar wave in surface pressure, wind, temperature and sea-ice extent. Nature 380:699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams AJ (1980) Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome at Gough Island. Bull BOC 100:208–212Google Scholar
  66. Williams AJ, Stone C (1981) Rockhopper Penguins Eudytpes chrysocome at Tristan da Cunha. Cormorant 9:59–66Google Scholar
  67. Williams TD (1990) Growth and survival in macaroni penguin, Eduyptes chrysolophus, A- and B-chicks: do females maximise investment in the large B-egg? Oikos 59:349–354Google Scholar
  68. Williams TD, Croxall JP (1991) Annual variation in breeding biology of macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus, at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Zool Lond 223:189–202Google Scholar
  69. Wilson RP, Culik B, Spairani HJ, Coria NR, Adelung D (1991) Depth utilization by penguins and Gentoo Penguin dive patterns. J Ornithol 132:47–60Google Scholar
  70. Wittenberger JF, Hunt GL Jr (1985) The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. Avian Biol 8:1–78Google Scholar
  71. Wooller RD, Bradley JS, Skira IJ, Serventy DL (1989) Short-tailed Shearwater. In: Newton I. (ed) Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic, London, pp 405–417Google Scholar
  72. Zullinger EM, Ricklefs RE, Redford KH, Mace GM (1984) Fitting sigmoidal equations to mammalian growth curves. J Mammal 65:607–636Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy L. Hull
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark Hindell
    • 1
  • Kirsten Le Mar
    • 1
  • Paul Scofield
    • 1
  • Jane Wilson
    • 1
  • Mary-Anne Lea
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ZoologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Environmental ServicesHydro TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations