Polar Biology

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 538–544 | Cite as

Causal and functional correlates of brood amalgamation in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica: parental decision and adult aggressiveness

  • Vincenzo PenterianiEmail author
  • Javier Viñuela
  • Josabel Belliure
  • Javier Bustamante
  • Miguel Ferrer
Original Paper


Despite the high number of species in which crèching behaviour has been analysed, the factors determining brood desertion and chick aggregations remain relatively poorly understood. We analysed crèching behaviour of chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) to test whether: (1) timing of chick aggregations was mainly determined by the growth stage of chicks or by adult physiological constraints; (2) the crèche acts as a protective mechanism against predation or as a defence against conspecific adult aggressiveness. Our results show that chick desertion was not related to chick growth rate and was driven primarily by a parental decision, determined by adult physical constraints imposed by moulting needs and the short breeding season in Antarctica. With respect to the functional meaning of brood amalgamations, our results suggest that they are originated by the aggressive behaviour of adults, although the forces driving them could depend greatly on ecological conditions and vary among species and populations. Finally, because brood amalgamations can be determined by adult aggressiveness contrasting with the origin and typical definition of the term "crèche" (which implies the nursery concept), we propose the use of the term "brood amalgamation" for the penguin "crèches".


Hatching Date Chinstrap Penguin Emperor Penguin Late Breeder Predation Attempt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The present study was supported by grant ANT91-1264 from the Spanish C.I.C.Y.T. (Plan Nacional Antártico). We gratefully acknowledge the Spanish Navy vessel "Hesperides" for transport to and from Deception Island, the Spanish Army Base "Gabriel de Castilla" and the personnel at Argentine Base for their hospitality and logistic support. We thank J.A. Fargallo, J. Moreno and three anonymous referees for the critique of the first draft of the manuscript.


  1. Adams NJ, Brown CR (1990) Energetics of molt in penguins. In: Davis SL, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 297–315Google Scholar
  2. Alonso-Alvarez C, Ferrer M, Viñuela J, Amat JA (2003) Plasma chemistry of chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica during fasting periods: a case of poor adaptation to food deprivation? Polar Biol 26:14–19Google Scholar
  3. Bedard J, Munro J (1976) Brood and crèche stability in the common eider of the St. Lawrence estuary. Behaviour 20:221–236Google Scholar
  4. Besnard A, Gimenez O, Lebreton J-D (2002) A model for the evolution of crèching behaviour in gulls. Evol Ecol 16:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bost CA, Jouventin P (1991) The breeding performance of the gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua at the northern edge of its range. Ibis 133:14–25Google Scholar
  6. Bustnes JO, Erikstad KE (1991) The role of failed nesters and brood abandoning females in the crèching system of the common eider Somateria mollissima. Ornis Scand 22:335–339Google Scholar
  7. Carter HR, Hobson KA (1988) Crèching behavior of Brandt's cormorant chicks. Condor 90:395–400Google Scholar
  8. Davis LS (1982) Crèching behaviour of Adélie penguin chicks. N Z J Zool 9:279–286Google Scholar
  9. De León A (2000) Effect of brood size on crèching age in the chinstrap penguin. Waterbirds 23:117–120Google Scholar
  10. De León A, Fargallo JA, Polo V, Potti J (2002) Adult aggression during the post-guard phase in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. Polar Biol 25:355–359Google Scholar
  11. Eadie JMcA, Lyon BE (1998) Cooperation, conflict and crèching behavior in goldeneye ducks. Am Nat 151:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eadie JMcA, Kehoe FP, Nudds TD (1988) Pre-hatch and post-hatch brood amalgamation in North American Anatidae: a review of hypotheses. Can J Zool 66:1709–1721Google Scholar
  13. Jackson S, Wilson RP (2002) The potential cost of flipper-bands to penguin. Funct Ecol 16:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jouventin P (1971) Comportement et structure sociale chez le Manchot empereur. Terre Vie 25:510–586Google Scholar
  15. Jouventin P, Barbraud C, Rubin M (1995) Adoption in the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri. Anim Behav 50:1023–1029Google Scholar
  16. Kilpi M, Öst M, Lindstrom K, Hannu R (2001) Female characteristics and parental care mode in the crèching system of eiders, Somateria mollissima. Anim Behav 62:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LeMaho Y (1977) The emperor penguin: a strategy to live and breed in the cold. Am Sci 65:680–693Google Scholar
  18. Levy N, Bernadsky G (1991) Crèche behavior in the Nubian ibex Capra ibex nubiana in the Negev desert highlands, Israel. Isr J Zool 37:125–137Google Scholar
  19. Lishman GS (1985) The comparative breeding biology of Adélie and chinstrap penguins Pygoscelis adeliae and P. antarctica at Signy Island, South Orkney Island. Ibis 127:84–99Google Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9Google Scholar
  21. Moreno J, Carrascal LM, Sanz JJ, Amat JA, Cuervo JJ (1994) Hatching asynchrony, sibling hierarchies and brood reduction in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. Polar Biol 14:21–30Google Scholar
  22. Moreno J, Barbosa A, Potti J, Merino S (1997) The effects of hatching date and parental quality on chick growth and crèching age in the chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica): a field experiment. Auk 114:47–54Google Scholar
  23. Moreno J, Viñuela J, Belliure J, Ferrer M (1998) Effect of brood size on growth in the chinstrap penguin: a field experiment. J Field Ornithol 69:269–275Google Scholar
  24. Müller DM, Kohlmann SG, Alkon PU (1995) A Nubian ibex nursery: crèche or natural trap? Isr J Zool 41:163–174Google Scholar
  25. Norman FI, McFarlane RA, Ward SJ (1994) Carcasses of Adélie penguins as a food source for South Polar skuas: some preliminary observations. Wilson Bull 106:26–34Google Scholar
  26. Penney RL (1968) Territorial and social behaviour in the Adélie penguin. Antarct Res Ser 12:83–131Google Scholar
  27. Pettingill OS Jr (1960) Crèche behaviour and individual recognition in a colony of rockhopper penguins. Wilson Bull 72:213–221Google Scholar
  28. Pienkowski MW, Evans PR (1982) Breeding behaviour, productivity and survival of colonial and non-colonial shelducks Tadorna tadorna. Ornis Scand 13:101–116Google Scholar
  29. Pierotti R (1991) Infanticide versus adoption: an intergenerational conflict. Am Nat 138:1140–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pietz PJ (1987) Feeding and nesting ecology of sympatric South Polar and brown skuas. Auk 104:617–627Google Scholar
  31. Riedman ML (1982) The evolution of alloparents care and adoption in mammals and birds. Q Rev Biol 57:405–435Google Scholar
  32. Schmutz JK, Robertson RJ, Cooke F (1982) Female sociality in the common eider duck during brood rearing. Can J Zool 60:3326–3331Google Scholar
  33. Seddon PJ, Heezik Y van (1993) Chick crèching and intraspecific aggression in the jackass penguin. J Field Ornithol 64:90–95Google Scholar
  34. Sladen WJL (1958) The pygoscelid penguins. Part 1 and 2. Falkland Isl Depend Surv Sci Rep 17:1–97Google Scholar
  35. Taylor RH (1962) The Adélie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae at Cape Royds. Ibis 104:176–204Google Scholar
  36. Tourenq C, Johnson AR, Gallo A (1995) Adult aggressiveness and crèching behavior in the greater flamingo, Phoenicopterus ruber roseus. Colon Waterbird 18:216–221Google Scholar
  37. Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Volkman NJ (1987) Ecological segregation of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology 68:351–361Google Scholar
  38. Viñuela J, Moreno J, Carrascal LM, Sanz JJ, Amat JA, Ferrer M, Belliure J, Cuervo JJ (1996) The effect of hatching date on parental care, chick growth, and chick mortality in the chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica. J Zool 240:51–58Google Scholar
  39. Wanker R, Bernate LC, Franck D (1996) Socialization of spectacled parrotlets Forpus conspicillatus: the role of parents, crèches and sibling groups in nature. J Ornithol 137:447–461Google Scholar
  40. Williams TD (1990) Annual variation in breeding biology of gentoo penguins, Pygoscelis papua, at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Zool 222:247–258Google Scholar
  41. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  42. Wittenberger JF, Hunt GL Jr (1985) The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parker KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–78Google Scholar
  43. Yeates GW (1975) Microclimate, climate and breeding success in Antarctic penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. University Park Press, London, pp 397–409Google Scholar
  44. Young E (1994) Skua and penguin. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Penteriani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Javier Viñuela
    • 2
  • Josabel Belliure
    • 3
  • Javier Bustamante
    • 1
  • Miguel Ferrer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Biology, Estación Biológica de DoñanaCSIC SevilleSpain
  2. 2.IRECCSIC-UCLM-JCCLMCiudad RealSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de AlcaláAlcalá de HenaresSpain

Personalised recommendations