Skip to main content
Log in

Micropropagation of Taxus mairei from mature trees

  • Cell Biology and Morphogenesis
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Micropropagation of mature Taxus mariei was achieved using bud explants derived from approximately 1,000-year-old field-grown trees. Bud explants derived from 1-year-old stecklings raised from rooted cuttings of these trees were included in this study for comparison. Steckling-derived explants collected in different seasons showed high survival rates and good growth performance in vitro, whereas the survival of mature tree-derived explants was highly season dependent, with satisfactory survival in early spring only. During successive subculturing, tissue browning was observed in cultures of both origins, but the problem was circumvented by supplementing the basal medium with 1 g l–1 activated charcoal and 100 mg l–1 silver nitrate. The steckling-derived cultures performed better than mature tree-derived cultures in terms of shoot multiplication and rooting ability. New shoots of both origins exhibited plagiotropic growth, but steckling-derived shoots had a smaller plagiotropic angle (near vertical) than mature tree-derived shoots. In both cases, the plagiotropic angles decreased after these subcultures were maintained in shoot multiplication conditions for half a year. Orthotropic growth was restored in 25% and 10% of the steckling- and mature tree-derived cultures, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, SH., Ho, CK., Chen, ZZ. et al. Micropropagation of Taxus mairei from mature trees. Plant Cell Rep 20, 496–502 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100362

Navigation