Skip to main content
Log in

Improved callus formation and plant regeneration for shed microspore culture in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 To establish an efficient asparagus microspore culture system, experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of medium components, period of cold pretreatment for flower buds, and period of anther co-culture on culture response. All factors affected the frequency of asparagus microspore division and the yields of microspore-derived calli. The best results were obtained by pretreating genotype G459 flower buds at 4  °C for 7–9 days, co-culturing anthers with shed microspores for 14 days, and including 6% sucrose, 2 mg l–1α-naphthaleneacetic acid and 1 mg l–1 N6-benzylaminopurine in the culture medium. After 4 days of culture, most shed microspores contained starch-like bodies and died. The 2% of shed microspores lacking these structures divided to produce microcalli. For the best treatments in the different experiments, about 140 calli per 100 anthers were recovered. Cultured on four different regeneration media, 19.6–21% and 3.9–8.0% of microspore-derived calli produced shoots and embryos, respectively, and ultimately plantlets, among which 49% were haploid, 34% diploid, 4% triploid and 11% tetraploid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 3 September 1998 / Revision received: 25 November 1998 / Accepted: 5 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, M., Wolyn, D. Improved callus formation and plant regeneration for shed microspore culture in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Plant Cell Reports 18, 954–958 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050690

Navigation