Abstract
Transgenic plants of Gladiolus cv. Jenny Lee were developed that contain the bargusA fusion gene under either the mannopine synthase 2 (mas2), translation elongation factor 1 subunit α (EF-1α), rolD, or the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoters. The relative level of gusA expression in leaves of five to ten independently transformed, in-vitro-grown plants representing each promoter was similar for transgenic plants containing the rolD and CaMV 35S promoter and 2.0-fold and 3.3-fold higher than the level for the mas2 and EF-1α promoters, respectively. The maximum level of gusA specific activity by leaves was 135–173 nmol 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU)/h per milligram protein for plants containing either CaMV 35S or rolD as compared to only 27–38 nmol 4-MU/h per milligram protein for plants with either mas2 or EF-1α. Histochemical staining confirmed the relatively high level of gusA expression throughout the length of the older, 6-cm-long leaves of plants that contained bargusA under rolD, whereas gusA expression was infrequently observed throughout the older leaves of plants containing either the mas2 or EF-1α promoters. In contrast to the older leaves, staining showed that strong gusA expression was frequently observed throughout young leaves of plants with either the mas2, EF-1α, or rolD promoters. Roots of plants with the rolD and EF-1α promoters showed strong gusA expression specifically in 93% and 68%, respectively, of the root tips. Roots of the plants with the mas2 promoter showed strong gusA expression throughout the entire length of the root.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 7 May 1998 / Revision received: 1 December 1998 / Accepted: 17 December 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamo, K., Blowers, A. Tissue specificity and expression level of gusA under rolD, mannopine synthase and translation elongation factor 1 subunit a promoters in transgenic Gladiolus plants. Plant Cell Reports 18, 809–815 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050666
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050666