Proteomics analysis identified a DRT protein involved in arsenic resistance in Populus
A DRT protein was identified and proved to be involved in the poplar arsenic resistance through comparative proteomics analysis between arsenic sensitive and resistant cultivars.
Arsenic pollution in soil has been a serious problem all over the world. It is very important to dissect plants arsenic stress-response mechanisms in phytoremediation. In this study, arsenate-tolerant Populus deltoides cv. ‘zhonglin 2025’ and arsenate-sensitive Populus × euramericana cv. ‘I-45/51’ were screened from 10 poplar varieties. Systematic comparisons between these two cultivars demonstrated that ‘zhonglin 2025’ exhibited slighter morphological and structural injury, lower ROS and MDA accumulation, and higher photosynthesis and ROS scavenging ability under arsenate stress, compared with ‘I-45/51’. Through comparative proteomics analysis, we detected that most of the identified arsenate-responsive proteins were stress and defense related. Among these proteins, PdDRT102 was found to be only highly induced in ‘zhonglin 2025’ under arsenate stress. Heterologous over-expression of PdDRT102 in Arabidopsis conferred to enhanced tolerance to arsenate and sodium chloride. PdDRT102 localizes to the plasma membrane and the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Interestingly, the remarkably increased fluorescence protein signals in the nucleus were found during arsenate stress. Together, these results not only provided an overall understanding on poplar response to arsenate stress, but also revealed that DRT102 protein might involve in protecting poplar against this stress
KeywordsPoplar Proteomics PdDRT102 Arsenate stress
This work was supported by the Sino-Africa Joint Research Project (SAJC201324).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.
- Abercrombie JM, Halfhill MD, Ranjan P, Rao MR, Saxton AM, Yuan JS, Stewart CN Jr (2008) Transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana plants to As (V) stress. BMC Plant Physiol 8:87Google Scholar
- Ahsan N, Lee DG, Alam I, Kim PJ, Lee JJ, Ahn YO, Kwak SS, Lee IJ, Bahk JD, Kang KY, Renaut J, Komatsu S, Lee BH (2008) Comparative proteomics study of arsenic-induced differentially expressed proteins in rice roots reveals glutathione plays a central role during As stress. Proteomics 8:3561–3576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akter KF, Owens G, Davey DE, Naidu R (2005) Arsenic speciation and toxicity in biological systems. Rev Environ Contam T 184:97–149Google Scholar
- Choudhury S, Panda SK (2004) Induction of oxidative stress and ultrastructural changes in moss Taxithelium nepalense (Schwaegr.) Broth. under lead and arsenic phytotoxicity. Curr Sci 87:342–347Google Scholar
- Heikens A, Panaullah GM, Meharg AA (2007) Arsenic behaviour from groundwater and soil to crops: impacts on agriculture and food safety. Rev Environ Contam T 189:43–87Google Scholar
- Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad RE, Acree TE, Decker EA, Penner MH, Reid DS, Schwartz SJ, Shoemaker CF, Smith DM, Sporns P (eds) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, New York, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- Pang Q, Hays JB, Rajagopal I, Schaefer TS (1993) Selection of Arabidopsis cDNAs that partially correct phenotypes of Escherichia coli DNA-damage-sensitive mutants and analysis of two plant cDNAs that appear to express UV-specific dark repair activities. Plant Mol Biol 22:411–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava S, Srivastava AK, Suprasanna P, D’Souza SF (2009) Comparative biochemical and transcriptional profiling of two contrasting varieties of Brassica juncea L. in response to arsenic exposure reveals mechanisms of stress perception and tolerance. J Exp Bot 60:3419–3431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar