Photosynthetic and biochemical mechanisms of an EMS-mutagenized cowpea associated with its resistance to cowpea severe mosaic virus
- 484 Downloads
The seed treatment of a CPSMV-susceptible cowpea genotype with the mutagenic agent EMS generated mutagenized resistant plantlets that respond to the virus challenge by activating biochemical and physiological defense mechanisms.
Cowpea is an important crop that makes major nutritional contributions particularly to the diet of the poor population worldwide. However, its production is low, because cowpea is naturally exposed to several abiotic and biotic stresses, including viral agents. Cowpea severe mosaic virus (CPSMV) drastically affects cowpea grain production. This study was conducted to compare photosynthetic and biochemical parameters of a CPSMV-susceptible cowpea (CE-31 genotype) and its derived ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized resistant plantlets, both challenged with CPSMV, to shed light on the mechanisms of virus resistance. CPSMV inoculation was done in the fully expanded secondary leaves, 15 days after planting. At 7 days post-inoculation, in vivo photosynthetic parameters were measured and leaves collected for biochemical analysis. CPSMV-inoculated mutagenized-resistant cowpea plantlets (MCPI) maintained higher photosynthesis index, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents in relation to the susceptible (CE-31) CPSMV-inoculated cowpea (CPI). Visually, the MCPI leaves did not exhibit any viral symptoms neither the presence of the virus as examined by RT-PCR. In addition, MCPI showed higher SOD, GPOX, chitinase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities, H2O2, phenolic contents, and cell wall lignifications, but lower CAT and APX activities in comparison to CPI. All together, these photosynthetic and biochemical changes might have contributed for the CPSMS resistance of MCPI. Contrarily, CPI plantlets showed CPSMV accumulation, severe disease symptoms, reduction in the photosynthesis-related parameters, chlorophyll, carotenoid, phenolic compound, and H2O2 contents, in addition to increased β-1,3-glucanase, and catalase activities that might have favored viral infection.
KeywordsCowpea CPSMV Plant defense Photosynthesis PR-proteins
Council for Advanced Professional Training (CAPES) sponsored Pedro F. N. Souza with a doctoral grant. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, grant 308107/2013-6), Research Council of the State of Ceara (FUNCAP, grant 2155/PRONEX), and Cearense Federation of Research and Culture (FCPC, Grant 09/2008) financially supported this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ainsworth EA, Gillespie KM (2007) Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Nature 2:875–877Google Scholar
- Boller T (1993) Biochemical analysis of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanases. In: Curr SJ (ed) Molecular plant pathology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 23–29Google Scholar
- Bolton MD (2009) Primary metabolism and plant defense—fuel for the fire. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 224:87–97Google Scholar
- Brioso PST, Santiago LM, Anjos JRN, Oliveira DE (1996) Identification of species of the Comovirus genus by polymerase chain reaction. Fitopatol Brasil 21:219–225Google Scholar
- Gonçalves MC, Vega J, Oliveira JG, Gomes MMA (2005) Sugarcane yellow leaf virus infection leads to alterations in photosynthetic efficiency and carbohydrate accumulation in sugarcane leaves. Fitopatol Brasil 30:10–16Google Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The Water Culture method for growing plants without soil, vol 347. California Agric. Exp. Station of University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Koshiba T (1993) Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase in seedlings and leaves of maize (Zea mays). Plant Cell Physiol 34:713–721Google Scholar
- Maia JM, Voigt EL, Ferreira-Silva SL, Fontenele AV, Macêdo CEC, Silveira JAG (2013) Differences in cowpea root growth triggered by salinity and dehydration are associated with oxidative modulation involving types I and III peroxidases and apoplastic ascorbate. J Plant Growth Regul 32:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paz CD, Lima JAA, Pio-Ribeiro G, Assis Filho FM, Andrade GP, Gonçalves MFB (1999) Purificação de um isolado do vírus do mosaico severo do caupi, obtido em Pernambuco, produção de antissoros e determinação de fontes de resistência em caupi. Summa Phytopathol 25:285–288Google Scholar
- Peixoto PHP, Cambraia J, Sant’Anna R, Mosquim PR, Moreira MA (1999) Aluminum effects on lipid peroxidation and on the activities of enzymes of oxidative metabolism in sorghum. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 11:137–143Google Scholar
- Rys M, Juhasz C, Surowka E, Janeczko A, Saja D, Tobiás I, Skoczowski A, Barna B, Gullner G (2014) Comparison of a compatible and an incompatible pepper-tobamovirus interaction by biochemical and non-invasive techniques: chlorophylla fluorescence, isothermal calorimetry and FT-Raman spectroscopy. Plant Physiol Biochem 83:267–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C (1994) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. In: Schulze ED, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–70Google Scholar
- Urbanek H, Kuzniak-Gebarowska E, Herka K (1991) Elicitation of defense responses in bean leaves by Botrytis cinerea polygalacturonase. Acta Physiol Plant 13:43–50Google Scholar