Skip to main content

The expanding footprint of CRISPR/Cas9 in the plant sciences

Plant Cell Reports volume 35, pages 1451–1468 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 has evolved and transformed the field of biology at an unprecedented pace. From the initial purpose of introducing a site specific mutation within a genome of choice, this technology has morphed into enabling a wide array of molecular applications, including site-specific transgene insertion and multiplexing for the simultaneous induction of multiple cleavage events. Efficiency, specificity, and flexibility are key attributes that have solidified CRISPR/Cas9 as the genome-editing tool of choice by scientists from all areas of biology. Within the field of plant biology, several CRISPR/Cas9 technologies, developed in other biological systems, have been successfully implemented to probe plant gene function and to modify specific crop traits. It is anticipated that this trend will persist and lead to the development of new applications and modifications of the CRISPR technology, adding to an ever-expanding collection of genome-editing tools. We envision that these tools will bestow plant researchers with new utilities to alter genome complexity, engineer site-specific integration events, control gene expression, generate transgene-free edited crops, and prevent or cure plant viral disease. The successful implementation of such utilities will represent a new frontier in plant biotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

Cas9:

CRISPR-associated protein 9

dCas9:

Dead Cas9

PAM:

Protospacer adjacent motif

RNP:

Ribonucleoprotein

sgRNA:

Single guide RNA

TALEN:

Transcription activator-like effector nuclease

References

  • Ahloowalia BS, Maluszynski M (2001) Induced mutations—a new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118:167–173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Z, Abul-faraj A, Li L, Ghosh N, Piatek M, Mahjoub A, Aouida M, Piatek A, Baltes NJ, Voytas DF et al (2015a) Efficient virus-mediated genome editing in plants using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 8:1288–1291

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Z, Abulfaraj A, Idris A, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Mahfouz MM (2015b) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol 16:238

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anton T, Bultmann S, Leonhardt H, Markaki Y (2014) Visualization of specific DNA sequences in living mouse embryonic stem cells with a programmable fluorescent CRISPR/Cas system. Nucleus 5:163–172

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auer TO, Duroure K, Cian AD, Concordet JP, Bene FD (2014) Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res 24:142–153

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bains GS, Howard HW (1950) Haploid plants of Solanum demissum. Nature 166:795

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes NJ, Gil-Humanes J, Cermak T, Atkins PA, Voytas DF (2014) DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell 26:151–163

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes NJ, Hummel AW, Konecna E, Cegan R, Bruns AN, Bisaro DM, Voytas DF (2015) Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR–Cas prokaryotic immune system. Nat Plants 1:15145

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V (2013) Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9:39

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Patron NJ, Nekrasov V (2015) Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:76–84

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Alfonso Y, Faulkner C, Ritzenthaler C, Maule AJ (2010) Plasmodesmata: gateways to local and systemic virus infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:1403–1412

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P, Hochschild A, Zhang F, Marraffini LA (2013) Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7429–7437

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF (2011) TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science 333:1843–1846

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD (2005) Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiol Read Engl 151:2551–2561

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortesi L, Fischer R (2015) The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv 33:41–52

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyko A, Kovalchuk I (2008) Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ Mol Mutagen 49:61–72

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman ZB, Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system. Plant Physiol 166:1292–1297

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardi T (2016) Cisgenesis and genome editing: combining concepts and efforts for a smarter use of genetic resources in crop breeding. Plant Breed 135:139–147

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran J, Brumin M, Wolf D, Leibman D, Klap C, Pearlsman M, Sherman A, Arazi T, Gal-On A (2016) Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mol Plant Pathol. doi:10.1111/mpp.12375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZJ (2007) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:377–406

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Rep 33:575–583

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Fenk LA, de Bono M (2013) Efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans by CRISPR-targeted homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e193

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li M, Feng X, Guang S (2015) Targeted Chromosomal Translocations And Essential Gene Knockout Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 201:1295–1306

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, Schmidt C, Zhang F, Hummel A, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF (2010) Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 186:757–761

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu VT, Weber T, Wefers B, Wurst W, Sander S, Rajewsky K, Kühn R (2015) Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 33:543–548

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y, Pirzada ZA, Eckert MR, Vogel J, Charpentier E (2011) CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471:602–607

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Q, Strong A, Patel KM, Ng SL, Gosis BS, Regan SN, Cowan CA, Rader DJ, Musunuru K (2014) Permanent alteration of PCSK9 with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Circ Res 115:488–492

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez AA, Lim WA, Qi LS (2016) Beyond editing: repurposing CRISPR-Cas9 for precision genome regulation and interrogation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:5–15

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong ZQ, Chen TT, Zhang J, Hu N, Cao MY, Dong FF, Jiang YM, Chen P, Lu C, Pan MH (2016). Establishment of a highly efficient virus-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system in insect cells. Antiviral Res 130:50–57

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM (2010) Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol J 8:377–424

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, Hou Y, Luo K (2015) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Sci Rep 5:12217

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 79:348–359

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y et al (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23:1229–1232

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Yuan J, Wang R, Liu Y, Birchler JA, Han F (2016) Efficient targeted genome modification in maize using CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Genet Genomics 43:37–43

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner F, Castellanos RU, Ülker B (2014) Precision genetic modifications: a new era in molecular biology and crop improvement. Planta 239:921–939

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamper HB, Parekh H, Rice MC, Bruner M, Youkey H, Kmiec EB (2000) The DNA strand of chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides can direct gene repair/conversion activity in mammalian and plant cell-free extracts. Nucleic Acids Res 28:4332–4339

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Wang G, Ma S, Xie X, Wu X, Zhang X, Wu Y, Zhao P, Xia Q (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol Biol 87:99–110

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garneau JE, Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S (2010) The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468:67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V (2012) Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2579–E2586

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger JM, Turan S, Hernandez S, Spector LP, Calos MP (2016) In vivo blunt-end cloning through CRISPR/Cas9-facilitated non-homologous end-joining. Nucleic Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1542

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gergerich RC, Welliver RA, Gettys S, Osterbauer NK, Kamenidou S, Martin RR, Golino DA, Eastwell K, Fuchs M, Vidalakis G et al (2015) Safeguarding fruit crops in the age of agricultural globalization. Plant Dis 99:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar GA, Torres SE, Stern-Ginossar N, Brandman O, Whitehead EH, Doudna JA et al (2013) CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154:442–451

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LA, Horlbeck MA, Adamson B, Villalta JE, Chen Y, Whitehead EH, Guimaraes C, Panning B, Ploegh HL, Bassik MC, Qi LS (2014) Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159:647–661

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha S, Maheshwari SC (1964) In vitro production of embryos from anthers of Datura. Nature 204:497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilinger JP, Thompson DB, Liu DR (2014) Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat Biotechnol 32:577–582

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez M, Hausner G (2012) Homing endonucleases: DNA scissors on a mission. Genome 55:553–569

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper G, Hull R, Lockhart B, Olszewski N (2002) Viral sequences integrated into plant genomes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:119–136

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton IB, D’Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, Gersbach CA (2015) Epigenome editing by a CRISPR/Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 33:510–517

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hnatuszko-Konka K, Kowalczyk T, Gerszberg A, Wiktorek-Smagug A, Kononowicz A (2014) Phaseolus vulgaris—recalcitrant potential. Biotechnol Adv 32:1205–1215

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Z, Zhang Y, Propson NE, Howden SE, Chu LF, Sontheimer EJ, Thomson JA (2013) Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:15644–15649

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou H, Atlihan N, Lu ZX (2014) New biotechnology enhances the application of cisgenesis in plant breeding. Front Plant Sci 5:389

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Houten JG, Quak F, van der Meer FA (1968) Heat treatment and meristem culture for the production of virus-free plant material. Neth J Plant Pathol 74:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, Li Y, Fine EJ, Wu X, Shalem O et al (2013) DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31:827–832

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Kaminski R, Yang F, Zhang Y, Cosentino L, Li F, Luo B, Alvarez-Carbonell D, Garcia-Mesa Y, Karn J et al (2014) RNA-directed gene editing specifically eradicates latent and prevents new HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:11461–11466

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AL, Bartz SR, Schelter J, Kobayashi SV, Burchard J, Mao M, Li B, Cavet G, Linsley PS (2003) Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation by RNAi. Nat Biotechnol 21:635–637

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs TB, LaFayette PR, Schmitz RJ, Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol 15:16

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenisch R, Bird A (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 33:245–254

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M (2015) Function genomics of abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a CRISPR approach. Front Plant Sci 6:375

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gao C (2015) Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nat Plants 1:15144

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Wang N (2014a) Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS ONE 9:e93806

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Wang N (2014b) Xcc-facilitated agroinfiltration of citrus leaves: a tool for rapid functional analysis of transgenes in citrus leaves. Plant Cell Rep 33:1993–2001

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41(20):e188

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Brueggeman AJ, Horken KM, Plucinak TM, Weeks DP (2014) Successful transient expression of Cas9 and single guide RNA genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell 13:1465–1469

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA—guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabadi AM, Gersbach CA (2014) Engineering synthetic TALE and CRISPR/Cas9 transcription factors for regulating gene expression. Methods 69:188–197

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi-Ashtiyani R, Ishii T, Niessen M, Stein N, Heckmann S, Gurushidze M, Banaei-Moghaddam AM, Fuchs J, Schubert V, Koch K et al (2015) Point mutation impairs centromeric CENH3 loading and induces haploid plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:11211–11216

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns NA, Pham H, Tabak B, Genga RM, Silverstein NJ, Garber M, Maehr R (2015) Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion. Nat Methods 12:401–403

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim D, Cho SW, Kim J, Kim JS (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res 24:1012–1019

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura Y, Hisano Y, Kawahara A, Higashijima S (2014) Efficient generation of knock-in transgenic zebrafish carrying reporter/driver genes by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Sci Rep 4:6545

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Gonzales APW, Li Z, Peterson RT, Yeh JRJ et al (2015) Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523:481–485

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Keith Joung J (2016) High-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529:490–495

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike-Yusa H, Li Y, Tan EP, Velasco-Herrera MDC, Yusa K (2014) Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nat Biotechnol 32:267–273

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konermann S, Brigham MD, Trevino AE, Joung J, Abudayyeh OO, Barcena C, Hsu PD, Habib N, Gootenberg JS, Nishimasu H et al (2015) Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature 517:583–588

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz G, Lopes R, Ugalde AP, Nevedomskaya E, Han R, Myacheva K, Zwart W, Elkon R, Agami R (2016) Functional genetic screens for enhancer elements in the human genome using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 34:192–198

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR (1999) T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2283–2290

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Jain M (2015) The CRISPR–Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. J Exp Bot 66:47–57

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CM, Cradick TJ, Bao G (2016) The Neisseria meningitidis CRISPR-Cas9 system enables specific genome editing in mammalian cells. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 24:645–654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Huang S, Jiang WZ, Wright D, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B (2011) TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain. Nucleic Acids Res 39:359–372

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 31:688–691

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C (2014) Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J Genet Genom 41:63–68

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin PC, Corn JE (2015) Co-opting CRISPR to deliver functional RNAs. Nat Methods 12:613–614

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisch D (2009) Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:43–66

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Hao L, Li D, Zhu L, Hu S (2015) Long non-coding RNAs and their biological roles in plants. Genom Proteom Bioinform 13:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowder L, Zhang Y, Baltes N, Paul J, Tang X, Zheng X, Voytas D, Hsieh TF, Zhang D, Qi Y (2015) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Phys 169:971–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Juste J, Cutler SR (2014) Plant genome engineering in full bloom. Trends Plant Sci 19:284–287

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y et al (2015) A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant 8:1274–1284

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeder ML, Linder SJ, Cascio VM, Fu Y, Ho QH, Joung JK (2013) CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat Methods 10:977–979

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouz MM, Piatek A, Stewart CN (2014) Genome engineering via TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 systems: challenges and perspectives. Plant Biotechnol J 12:1006–1014

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mali P, Aach J, Stranges PB, Esvelt KM, Moosburner M, Kosuri S, Yang L, Church GM (2013) Cas9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol 31:833–838

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama T, Dougan SK, Truttmann MC, Bilate AM, Ingram JR, Ploegh HL (2015) Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat Biotechnol 33:538–542

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu LJ (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res 23:1233–1236

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojica FJM, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, Soria E (2005) Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 60:174–182

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C, Sargent DJ, Velasco R, Maffei ME, Malnoy M (2015) Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops. Trends Biotechnol 33:62–64

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JDG, Kamoun S (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:691–693

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles DA, Fang MY, Aigner S, Yeo GW (2015) Applications of Cas9 as an RNA-programmed RNA-binding protein. BioEssays 37:732–739

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles DA, Fang MY, O’Connell MR, Xu JL, Markmiller SJ, Doudna JA, and Yeo GW (2016) Programmable RNA tracking in live cells with CRISPR/Cas9. Cell 165:488–496

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez JK, Harrington LB, Kranzusch PJ, Engelman AN, Doudna JA (2015) Foreign DNA capture during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity. Nature 527:535–538

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell MR, Oakes BL, Sternberg SH, East-Seletsky A, Kaplan M, Doudna JA (2014) Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 516:263–266

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paszkowski J (2015) Controlled activation of retrotransposition for plant breeding. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:200–206

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatek A, Ali Z, Baazim H, Li L, Abulfaraj A, Al-Shareef S, Aouida M, Mahfouz MM (2015) RNA-guided transcriptional regulation in planta via synthetic dCas9-based transcription factors. Plant Biotechnol J 13:578–589

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, Nogué F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol 31:375–383

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteus MH, Baltimore D (2003) Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells. Science 300:763

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price AA, Sampson TR, Ratner HK, Grakoui A, Weiss DS (2015) Cas9-mediated targeting of viral RNA in eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:6164–6169

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puchta H (2016) Using CRISPR/Cas in three dimensions: towards synthetic plant genomes, transcriptomes and epigenomes. Plant J. doi:10.1111/tpj.13100 (in press)

  • Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA (2013) Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152:1173–1183

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raitskin O, Patron NJ (2016) Multi-gene engineering in plants with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Curr Opin Biotechnol 37:69–75

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanan V, Shlomai A, Cox DBT, Schwartz RE, Michailidis E, Bhatta A, Scott DA, Zhang F, Rice CM, Bhatia SN (2015) CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage of viral DNA efficiently suppresses hepatitis B virus. Sci Rep 5:10833

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin CY, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, Trevino AE, Scott DA, Inoue A, Matoba S, Zhang Y et al (2013) Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154:1380–1389

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenburg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu X, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Sharp PA, Zhang F (2015) In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520:186–191

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratz M, Testa I, Hell SW, Jakobs S (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated endogenous protein tagging for RESOLFT super-resolution microscopy of living human cells. Sci Rep 5:9592

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JC, Allis CD (2001) Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigenetic regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:263–273

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan J, Li H, Xu K, Wu T, Wei J, Zhou R, Liu Z, Mu Y, Yang S, Ouyang H et al (2015) Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene knock-in at the H11 locus in pigs. Sci Rep 5:14253

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer SM, Nakata PA (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: transitioning from lab to field. Plant Sci 240:130–142

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiml S, Puchta H (2016) Revolutionizing plant biology: multiple ways of genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas. Plant Methods 12:8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiml S, Fauser F, Puchta H (2014) The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J 80:1139–1150

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T, Schmid-Burgk JL, Hornung V (2015) Synthesis of an arrayed sgRNA library targeting the human genome. Sci Rep 5:14987

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten HJ, Krens FA, Jacobsen E (2006) Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants. EMBO Rep 7:750–753

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalem O, Sanjana NE, Hartenian E, Shi X, Scott DA, Mikkelsen TS, Heckl D, Ebert BL, Root DE, Doench JG et al (2014) Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343:84–87

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Xi JJ, Qiu JL et al (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:686–688

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shechner DM, Hacisuleyman E, Younger ST, Rinn JL (2015) Multiplexable, locus-specific targeting of long RNAs with CRISPR-Display. Nat Methods 12:664–670

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaymaker IM, Gao L, Zetsche B, Scott DA, Yan WX, Zhang F (2016) Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351:84–88

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small I (2007) RNAi for revealing and engineering plant gene functions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:148–153

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Angel A, Howard M, Dean C (2012) Vernalization—a cold-induced epigenetic switch. J Cell Sci 125:3723–3731

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprink T, Metje J, Hartung F (2015) Plant genome editing by novel tools: TALEN and other sequence specific nucleases. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:47–53

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugano SS, Shirakawa M, Takagi J, Matsuda Y, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I, Kohchi T (2014) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol 55:475–481

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, Cigan AM (2015) Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol 169:931–945

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swiech L, Heidenreich M, Banerjee A, Habib N, Li Y, Trombetta J, Sur M, Zhang F (2015) In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 33:102–106

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadege M, Wen J, He J, Tu H, Kwak Y, Eschstruth A, Cayrel A, Endre G, Zhao PX, Chabaud M et al (2008) Large-scale insertional mutagenesis using the Tnt1 retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 54:335–347

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fu F, Maeder ML, Joung JK, Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459:442–445

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SQ, Wyvekens N, Khayter C, Foden JA, Thapar V, Reyon D, Goodwin MJ, Aryee MJ, Joung JK (2014) Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 32:569–576

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turck F, Coupland G (2014) Natural variation in epigenetic gene regulation and its effects on plant developmental traits. Evolution 68:620–631

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voytas DF, Gao C (2014) Precision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol 12:e1001877

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, Qiu JL (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol 32:947–951

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhang S, Wang W, Xiong X, Meng F, Cui X (2015) Efficient targeted mutagenesis in potato by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Cell Rep 34:1473–1476

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Zhao N, Berkhout B, Das AT (2016) CRISPR-Cas9 can inhibit HIV-1 replication but NHEJ repair facilitates virus escape. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 24:522–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JM, Fusaro AF, Wang M, Waterhouse PM (2005) RNA silencing platforms in plants. FEBS Lett 579:5982–5987

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks DP, Spalding MH, Yang B (2015) Use of designer nucleases for targeted gene and genome editing in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 14:483–495

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA (2012) RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 482:331–338

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim SG, Kim ST, Choe S, Kim JS (2015) DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 33:1162–1164

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AV, Sternberg SH, Taylor DW, Staahl BT, Bardales JA, Kornfeld JE, Doudna JA (2015) Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:2984–2989

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Liang D, Wang Y, Bai M, Tang W, Bao S, Yan Z, Li D, Li J (2013) Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 13:659–662

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao A, Wang Z, Hu Y, Wu Y, Luo Z, Yang Z, Zu Y, Li W, Huang P, Tong X et al (2013) Chromosomal deletions and inversions mediated by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas in zebrafish. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e141

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu RF, Li H, Qin RY, Li J, Qiu CH, Yang YC, Ma H, Li L, Wei PC, Yang JB (2015) Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 5:11491

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wang H, Shivalila CS, Cheng AW, Shi L, Jaenisch R (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154:1370–1379

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Güell M, Niu D, George H, Lesha E, Grishin D, Aach J, Shrock E, Xu W, Poci J et al (2015) Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science 350:1101–1104

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin H, Xue W, Chen S, Bogorad RL, Benedetti E, Grompe M, Koteliansky V, Sharp PA, Jacks T, Anderson DG (2014) Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat Biotechnol 32:551–553

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi SS, Mansoor S, Ali Z, Tashkandi M, Mahfouz MM (2016) Engineering plants for Geminivirus resistance with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Trends Plant Sci 21:279–281

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zetsche B, Volz SE, Zhang F (2015a) A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. Nat Biotechnol 33:139–142

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A et al (2015b) Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163:759–771

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Zhang J, Wei P, Zhang B, Gou F, Feng Z, Mao Y, Yang L, Zhang H, Xu N et al (2014) The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol J 12:797–807

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Jia R, Palange NJ, Satheka AC, Togo J, An Y, Humphrey M, Ban L, Ji Y, Jin H et al (2015) Large genomic fragment deletions and insertions in mouse using CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS ONE 10:e0120396

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Li Z, and Li JF (2016a) Targeted gene manipulation in plants using the CRISPR/Cas technology. J Genet Genomics. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Yang X, Yang C, Li M, Guo Y (2016b) Exploiting the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted genome mutagenesis in Petunia. Sci Rep 6:20315

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Liu B, Weeks DP, Spalding MH, Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10903–10914

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Jacobs TB, Xue LJ, Harding SA, Tsai CJ (2015) Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytol 208:298–301

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Department of Agriculture, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. The authors apologize to those whose work could not be cited due to space limitation. The authors would like to thank Dr. Michele McConn, Dr. Christopher Hendrickson, and Ms. Vandhana Krishnan for critically reading this manuscript and Mr. Adam Gillum for his assistance in preparing Fig. 3.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, 1100 Bates St., Houston, TX, 77030-2600, USA

    Scott M. Schaeffer & Paul A. Nakata

Authors
  1. Scott M. Schaeffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. Nakata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Nakata.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, under Cooperative Agreement Number 58-3092-5-001.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Mahfouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaeffer, S.M., Nakata, P.A. The expanding footprint of CRISPR/Cas9 in the plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep 35, 1451–1468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1987-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1987-x

Keywords

  • Cas9
  • CRISPR
  • Crop improvement
  • Gene editing
  • Gene knock-in
  • Functional genomics