Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 30, Issue 11, pp 1991–2000 | Cite as

Assessment of simple marker-free genetic transformation techniques in alfalfa

  • Nicoletta Ferradini
  • Alessandro Nicolia
  • Stefano Capomaccio
  • Fabio Veronesi
  • Daniele Rosellini
Original Paper


Methods to avoid the presence of selectable marker genes (SMG) in transgenic plants are available but not implemented in many crop species. We assessed the efficiency of simple marker-free Agrobacterium-mediated transformation techniques in alfalfa: regeneration without selection, or marker-less, and co-transformation with two vectors, one containing the SMG and one containing a non-selected gene. To easily estimate the efficiency of marker-less transformation, the nptII and the GUS markers were used as non-selected genes. After Agrobacterium treatment, somatic embryos were regenerated without selection. The percentage of transgenic embryos was determined by a second cycle of regeneration using the embryos as starting material, in the presence of kanamycin, by PCR screening of T1 progenies, and by the GUS test. In two experiments, from 0 to 1.7% of the somatic embryos were transgenic. Co-transformation was performed with two vectors, one with the hemL SMG and one with the unselected nptII gene, each carried by a different culture of Agrobacterium. Only 15 putative co-transformed plants were regenerated from two experiments, with an average co-transformation percentage of 3.7. Southern blot hybridizations and/or T1 progeny segregation were used to confirm transgene integration, and qPCR was also used to estimate the T-DNA copy number. In the T1 progenies obtained by crossing with a non-transgenic pollinator, marker-free segregants were obtained. Both marker-free approaches showed very low efficiency.


Co-transformation Genetic engineering Marker-less transformation Medicago sativa Selectable markers 



Funding was provided by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific research, Project: ‘Impact of genetic engineering on the alfalfa genome and strategies to reduce it’ (PI Daniele Rosellini). Nicoletta Ferradini acknowledges the European Union (Programme POR FSE 2007–2013) for financial support. Patrizia Lepri provided valuable help with tissue culture work.


  1. Altpeter F, Baisakh N, Beachy R, Bocket R et al (2005) Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities. Mol Breeding 15:305–327. doi: 10.1007/s11032-004-8001-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar M, Prasad K, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Narasu ML, Waliyar F, Sharma KK (2010) An efficient method for the production of marker-free transgenic plants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Rep 29:495–502. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0838-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bingham ET (1991) Registration of alfalfa hybrid Regen-SY germplasm for tissue culture and transformation research. Crop Sci 31:1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown DCW, Atanassov A (1985) Role of genetic background in somatic embryogenesis in Medicago. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 4:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Block M, Debrouwer D (1991) Two T-DNA’s co-transformed into Brassica napus by a double Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection are mainly integrated at the same locus. Theor Appl Genet 82:257–263. doi: 10.1007/BF02190610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Buck S, Jacobs A, Montagu MV, Depicker A (1998) Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and cotransformation frequencies of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants and tobacco protoplast. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:449–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Vetten N, Wolters AM, Raemakers K, van der Meer I, ter Stege R, Heeres E, Heeres P, Visser R (2003) A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop. Nat Biotechnol 21:439–442. doi: 10.1007/s11627-007-9089-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Depicker A, Herman L, Jacobs A, Schdl J, Van Montagu M (1985) Frequencies of simultaneous transformation with different T-DNAs and their relevance to the Agrobacterium/plant cell interaction. Mol Gen Genet 201:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doshi KM, Eudes E, Laroche A, Gaudet D (2007) Anthocyanin expression in marker free transgenic wheat and triticale embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:429–435. doi: 10.1007/s11627-007-9089-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutt M, Li ZT, Dhekney SA, Gray DJ (2008) A co-transformation system to produce transgenic grapevines free of marker genes. Plant Sci 175:423–430. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Endo S, Yamada K, Komamine A (2001) Systems for the removal of a selection marker and their combination with a positive marker. Plant Cell Rep 20:383. doi: 10.1007/s002990100344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gough KC, Hawes WS, Kilpatrick J, Whitelam GC (2001) Cyanobacterial GR6 glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase: a novel enzyme-based selectable marker for plant transformation. Plant Cell Rep 20:296–300. doi: 10.1007/s002990100337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hajdukiewicz P, Svab Z, Maliga P (1994) The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 25:989–994. doi: 10.1007/BF00014672 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellens R, Mullineaux P, Klee H (2000) A guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors. Trends Plant Sci 5(10):446–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jia H, Liao M, Verbelen J-P, Vissenberg K (2007) Direct creation of marker-free tobacco plants from agroinfiltrated leaf discs. Plant Cell Rep 26:1961–1965. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0403-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236:1299–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller M, Tagliani L, Wang N, Berka B, Bidney D, Zhao ZY (2002) High efficiency transgene segregation in co-transformed maize plants using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens 2 T-DNA binary system. Transgenic Res 11:381–396. doi: 10.1023/A:1016390621482 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park J, Lee YK, Kang BK, Chung WI (2004) Co-transformation using a negative selectable marker gene for the production of selectable marker gene-free transgenic plants. Theor Appl Genet 109:1562–1567. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1790-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Popelka JC, Xu J, Altpeter F (2003) Generation of rye (Secale cereale L.) plants with low transgene copy number after biolistic gene transfer and production of instantly marker-free transgenic rye. Transgenic Res 12:587–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. RamanaRao MV, Veluthambi K (2010) Selectable marker elimination in the T0 generation by Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation involving Mungbean yellow mosaic virus TrAP as a non-conditional negative selectable marker and bar for transient positive selection. Plant Cell Rep 29:473–483. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0836-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramessar K, Peremarti A, Gomez-Galera S, Naqvi S, Moralejo M, Munoz P, Capell T, Christou P (2007) Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics. Transgenic Res 16:261–280. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9083-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosellini D, Capomaccio S, Ferradini N, Savo Sardaro ML, Nicolia A, Veronesi F (2007) Non-antibiotic, efficient selection for alfalfa genetic engineering. Plant Cell Rep 26:1035–1044. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0321-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132:365–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Samac DA (1995) Strain specificity in transformation of alfalfa by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 43:271–277Google Scholar
  25. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarbourGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheikholeslam SN, Weeks DP (1987) Acetosyringone promotes high efficiency transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana explants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol 8:291–298. doi: 10.1007/BF00021308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weeks JT, Ye J, Rommens CM (2008) Development of an in planta method for transformation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Transgenic Res 17:587–597. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9132-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoletta Ferradini
    • 1
  • Alessandro Nicolia
    • 1
  • Stefano Capomaccio
    • 1
  • Fabio Veronesi
    • 1
  • Daniele Rosellini
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia ApplicataUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations