Skip to main content

Protamine-mediated DNA coating remarkably improves bombardment transformation efficiency in plant cells

Abstract

We have developed a method by which remarkably higher efficiencies of transient and stable transformation were achieved in bombardment transformation of plants. Over fivefold increase in transient gus gene expression was achieved when rice or maize suspension cells were bombarded with gold particles coated with plasmid DNA in the presence of protamine instead of the conventional spermidine. A 3.3-fold improvement in stable transformation efficiency was also observed using rice suspension cells with the new coating approach. The coated protamine-plasmid DNA complex resisted degradation by a DNase or by rice cell extract much longer than the spermidine-plasmid DNA complex. The results from this study suggest that protamine protects plasmid DNA longer than spermidine when being delivered inside the cells, probably by forming a nano-scale complex, and thus helps improve the efficiency of particle bombardment-mediated plant transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

GUS:

β-Glucuronidase

hyg B:

Hygromycin B

LUC:

Luciferase

MU:

Methylumbelliferone

MUG:

4-Methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide

NOS:

Nopaline synthase

pDNA:

Plasmid DNA

X-Gluc:

5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-glucuronic acid

References

  • Bode J, Lesemann D (1977) Anatomy of cooperative binding between protamines and DNA. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 358:1505–1512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brune B, Hartzell P, Nicotera P, Orrenius S (1991) Spermine prevents endonuclease activation and apoptosis in thymocytes. Exp Cell Res 195:323–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Ye XD, Armstrong CL (2004) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M (1991) Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important indica and Japonica varieties via electric-discharge particle-acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Biotechnology 9:957–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui ZG, Han SJ, Huang L (2004) Coating of mannan on LPD particles containing HPV E7 peptide significantly enhances immunity against HPV-positive tumor. Pharm Res 21:1018–1025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniell H, Vivekananda J, Nielsen BL, Ye GN, Tewari KK, Sanford JC (1990) Transient foreign gene-expression in chloroplasts of cultured tobacco cells after biolistic delivery of chloroplast vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:88–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14:19–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ, Vain P, Jones MW, Mcmullen MD (1992) Development of the particle inflow gun for DNA delivery to plant-cells. Plant Cell Rep 11:323–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher SR (1992) GUS protocols: using the GUS gene as a reporter of gene expression quantitation of GUS activity by fluorometry. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevich JJ, Daniell H (2005) Chloroplast genetic engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:83–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkmann M, Lochmann D, Weyermann J, Marschner A, Poeck H, Wagner M, Battiany J, Zimmer A, Endres S, Hartmann G (2006) Immunostimulatory properties of CpG-oligonucleotides are enhanced by the use of protamine nanoparticles. Oligonucleotides 16:313–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Wolf ED, Wu R, Sanford JC (1987) High-velocity microprojectiles for delivering nucleic-acids into living cells. Nature 327:70–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knowle R, Werner A, DeLong RK (2006) R4 peptide-pDNA nanoparticle coated HepB vaccine microparticles: sedimentation, partitioning, and spray freeze dry bioprocesses. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:2783–2789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kogure K (2007) Development of a novel artificial gene delivery system multifunctional envelope-type nano device for gene therapy. Yakugaku Zasshi J Pharm Soc Jpn 127:1685–1691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leckie F, Devoto A, Delorenzo G (1994) Normalization of GUS by luciferase activity from the same cell extract reduces transformation variability. Biotechniques 17:52–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Huang L (1997) Protamine sulfate provides enhanced and reproducible intravenous gene transfer by cationic liposome/DNA complex. J Liposome Res 7:207–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe D, Christou P (1993) Direct DNA transfer using electric-discharge particle-acceleration (accell(Tm) technology). Plant Cell Tissue Organ 33:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Midoux P, Monsigny M (1999) Efficient gene transfer by histidylated polylysine pDNA complexes. Bioconjug Chem 10:406–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park YJ, Liang JF, Ko KS, Kim SW, Yang VC (2003) Low molecular weight protamine as an efficient and nontoxic gene carrier: in vitro study. J Gene Med 5:700–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasupathy K, Lin S, Hu Q, Luo H, Ke PC (2008) Direct plant gene delivery with a poly(amidoamine) dendrimer. Biotech J 3:1078–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perl A, Kless H, Blumenthal A, Galili G, Galun E (1992) Improvement of plant-regeneration and gus expression in scutellar wheat calli by optimization of culture conditions and DNA-microprojectile delivery procedures. Mol Gen Genet 235:279–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasco-Gaunt S, Riley A, Barcelo P, Lazzeri PA (1999) Analysis of particle bombardment parameters to optimise DNA delivery into wheat tissues. Plant Cell Rep 19:118–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SG (1991) Free DNA methods for plant transformation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2:153–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford JC, Smith FD, Russell JA (1993) Optimizing the biolistic process for different biological applications. Methods Enzymol 217:483–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shrawat AK, Lorz H (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals: a promising approach crossing barriers. Plant Biotechnol J 4:575–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivamani E, Qu R (2006) Expression enhancement of a rice polyubiquitin gene promoter. Plant Mol Biol 60:225–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivamani E, Shen P, Opalka N, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM (1996) Selection of large quantities of embryogenic calli from indica rice seeds for production of fertile transgenic plants using the biolistic method. Plant Cell Rep 15:322–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorgi FL, Bhattacharya S, Huang L (1997) Protamine sulfate enhances lipid-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther 4:961–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas TJ, Kulkarni GD, Greenfield NJ, Shirahata A, Thomas T (1996) Structural specificity effects of trivalent polyamine analogues on the stabilization and conformational plasticity of triplex DNA. Biochem J 319:591–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY, Wang K (2007) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol 2:295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vain P (2007) Thirty years of plant transformation technology development. Plant Biotechnol J 5:221–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Brown SM, Re D, Fromm ME, Vasil IK (1991) Stably transformed callus lines from microprojectile bombardment of cell-suspension cultures of wheat. Biotechnology 9:743–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner E, Cotten M, Foisner R, Birnstiel ML (1991) Transferrin polycation DNA complexes—the effect of polycations on the structure of the complex and DNA delivery to cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4255–4259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willmitzer L, Wagner KG (1980) The binding of protamines to DNA—role of protamine phosphorylation. Biophys Struct Mech 6:95–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zauner W, Kichler A, Schmidt W, Sinski A, Wagner E (1996) Glycerol enhancement of ligand-polylysine/DNA transfection. Biotechniques 20:905–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Plasmid DNA construct pJD313 from Dr. J. Sheen, and technical assistance from S. Srilaxmi are gratefully acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to Dr. A. Weissinger for helpful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongda Qu.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Ozias Akins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivamani, E., DeLong, R.K. & Qu, R. Protamine-mediated DNA coating remarkably improves bombardment transformation efficiency in plant cells. Plant Cell Rep 28, 213–221 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0636-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0636-4

Keywords

  • DNA coating
  • DNA delivery
  • GUS
  • Plant transformation
  • Particle bombardment
  • Protamine