Skip to main content

The effect of co-cultivation and selection parameters on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chinese soybean varieties

Abstract

In the present study, an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation system was developed for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] based on the examinations of several factors affecting plant transformation efficiency. Increased transformation efficiencies were obtained when the soybean cotyledonary node were inoculated with the Agrobacterium inoculum added with 0.02% (v/v) surfactant (Silwet L-77). The applications of Silwet L-77 (0.02%) during infection and l-cysteine (600 mg l−1) during co-cultivation resulted in more significantly improved transformation efficiency than each of the two factors alone. The optimized temperature for infected explant co-cultivation was 22°C. Regenerated transgenic shoots were selected and produced more efficiently with the modified selection scheme (initiation on shoot induction medium without hygromycin for 7 days, with 3 mg l−1 hygromycin for 10 days, 5 mg l−1 hygromycin for another 10 days, and elongation on shoot elongation medium with 8 mg l−1 hygromycin). Using the optimized system, we obtained 145 morphologically normal and fertile independent transgenic plants in five important Chinese soybean varieties. The transformation efficacies ranged from 3.8 to 11.7%. Stable integration, expression and inheritance of the transgenes were confirmed by molecular and genetic analysis. T1 plants were analyzed and transmission of transgenes to the T1 generation in a Mendelian fashion was verified. This optimized transformation system should be employed for efficient Agrobacterium-mediated soybean gene transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Abbreviations

BAP :

N6-Benzylaminopurine

GUS :

β-Glucuronidase

IAA :

Indole-3-acetic acid

IBA :

Indole-3-butyric acid

GA 3 :

Gibberellic acid

MES :

2-[N-Morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid

References

  • An G, Evert PR, Mitra A, Ha SB (1988) Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual A3. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Fry JE, Pang SZ, Zhou HP, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW, Wan YC (1997) Genetic transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 115:971–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente TE, LaVallee BJ, Howe AR, Conner-Ward D, Rozman RJ, Hunter PE, Broyles DL, Kasten DS, Hinchee MA (2000) Progeny analysis of glyphosate selected transgenic soybean derived from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Crop Sci 40:797–803

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis IS, Nam HG (2001) Transgenic radish (Raphanus sativus L. longipinnatus Bailey) by floral-dip method—plant development and surfactant are important in optimizing transformation efficiency. Transgenic Res 10:363–371

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillen W, DeClercq J, Kapila J, Zambre M, Van Montagu M, Angenon G (1997) The effect of temperature on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to plants. Plant J 12:1459–1463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez-Obregon GA, Prieto-Samsonov DL, de la Riva GA, Perez M, Selman-Housein G, Vazquez-Padron RI (1999) Agrobacterium-mediated Japonica rice transformation: a procedure assisted by an anti-necrotic treatment. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 59:159–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ, McMullen MD (1991) Transformation of soybean via particle bombardment of embryogenic suspension culture tissue. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 27P:175–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frame BR, Shou HX, Chikwamba RK, Zhang ZY, et al (2002) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiol 129:13–22

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fullner KJ, Nester EW (1996) Temperature affects the T-DNA transfer machinery of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 178:1498–1504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fullner KJ, Lara JC, Nester EW (1996) Pilus assembly by Agrobacterium T-DNA transfer genes. Science 273:1107–1109

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel CB, Klein TM, Anis M, Wilde HD, Parrott WA (1998) Growth characteristics and transformability of soybean embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep 17:765–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchee MA, Connor-Ward DV, Newell CA, McDonnell RE, Sato SJ, Gasser CS, Fischhoff DA, Re DB, Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1988) Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Biotechnology 6:915–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A (1975) New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res 2:208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang XQ, Wei ZM (2005) Successful Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of maize elite inbred lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cultre 83:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko T-S, Lee S, Krasnyanski S, Korban SS (2003) Two critical factors are required for efficient transformation of multiple soybean cultivars: Agrobacterium strain and orientation of immature cotyledonary explant. Theor Appl Gene 107:439–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T, Hasegawa H, Suzuki M (2000) Transformation and regeneration of garlic (Allium sativum L.) by Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Plant Cell Rep 19:989–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H-K, Wei Z-M (2002) A method for sterilizing mature seeds of soybean. Plant Physiol Commun 38:261–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Flagel LE, Donovan CM, Somers DA (2003) Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method. Planta 216:723–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Lin K, Galbraith J, Nielsen NC, Somers DA (2001) The role of thiol compounds in increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep 20:731–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Somers DA (2001) L-cysteine increases Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA delivery into soybean cotyledoanry-node cells. Plant Cell Rep 20:706–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarem ER, Finer JJ (1999) Transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] using proliferative embryogenic tissue maintained on semisolid medium. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunilkumar G, Rathore KS (2001) Transgenic cotton: factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration. Mol Breed 8:37–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Qi M, Cutler AJ (1993) A simple method of preparing plant samples for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4153–4154

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Sparks C, Amoah B, Jones D (2003) Factors influencing successful Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of wheat. Plant Cell Rep 21:659–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Reddy MSS, Collins GB, Dinkins RD (2000) Agrobacterium tumefaciens– mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] using immature zygotic cotyledon explants. Plant Cell Rep 19:1090–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng P, Vadnais DA, Zhang Z, Polacco JC (2003) Refined glufosinate selection in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Plant Cell Rep 22:478–482

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Coyne DP, Mita A (1997) Factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of common bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122:300–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xing A, Staswick PE, Clemente TE (1999) The use of glufosinate as a selective agent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 56:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Gu W, Cai T, Tagliani L, Hondred D, Bond D, Schroeder S, Rudert M, Pierce D (2001) High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in maize. Mol Breed 8:323–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Qiu Huang.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Register.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, SJ., Wei, ZM. & Huang, JQ. The effect of co-cultivation and selection parameters on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chinese soybean varieties. Plant Cell Rep 27, 489–498 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0475-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0475-8

Keywords

  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens
  • Glycine max
  • cotyledonary node
  • Transformation