Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro regeneration of wild pear (Pyrus pyraster Burgsd) clones tolerant to Fe-chlorosis and somaclonal variation analysis by RAPD markers

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An in vitro adventitious regeneration system under selective pressure was established in Pyrus pyraster Burgsd to obtain somaclones with higher adaptability to calcareous soils. P. pyraster is important species, both for its relative closeness to cultivated pear and for reforestation of marginal farmland and for the production of timber. Shoot regeneration was induced from leaves and vegetative apices of in vitro-grown shoots on a modified LP medium supplemented with naphtaleneacetic acid (1.07 μM) and benziladenine (BA, 8.9 μM). After 30 days, explants were transferred to an expression medium consisting of the same basal medium with only BA present. Selective treatments utilized MS medium with Fe-EDTA replaced by equimolar amount of FeSO4 with either KHCO3 or NaHCO3. Through the selection process 11 putatively tolerant lines were obtained from vegetative shoot apices. RAPD analysis was performed on these lines to allow comparison to the mother clone. A total of seven 10-mer primers were used to amplify all the genotypes and 74 scorable fragments were produced. These were analysed using the Dice similarity index, showing genetic variability among the 11 regenerated clones and between them and the mother clone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

Benzyladenine

EX:

Expression phase

IND:

Induction phase

LE:

Leaf explant

LP:

Quoirin et al.

MULT:

Multiplication

SAE:

Shoot apex explants

References

  • Bradbury DE (1981) The physiological geography of the Mediterranean lands. In: Castri F, Goodall DW, Spechi RL (eds) Ecosystem of the world: Mediterranean type sublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnag S, Dolcet Sanjuan R, Mok DWS, Mok M (1996) Response of two somaclonal variants of quince (Cydonia oblonga) to iron deficiency in the greenhouse and field. J Am Soc Hort 121:1054–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Caboni E, Anselmi S, Donato E, Manes F (2003) In vitro selection of Actinidia deliciosa clones tolerant to NaCl and their molecular and in vivo ecophysiological characterisation. Acta Hortic 618:77–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caboni E, D'Angeli S, Chiappetta A, Innocenti AM, van Onckelen H, Damiano C (2002) Adventitious shoot regeneration from vegetative shoot apices in pear and putative role of cytokinin accumulation in the morphogenic process. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 70:199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caboni E, Lauri P (2002) Micropropagation as a tool to evaluate response to Fe-limiting conditions in almond genotypes. Acta Hortic 591:341–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Caboni E, Lauri P, Damiano C, D'Angeli S (2000) Somaclonal variation induced by adventitious shoot regeneration in pear and apple. Acta Hortic 530:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Caboni E, Tonelli MG, Lauri P, D'Angeli S, Damiano C (1999) In vitro shoot regeneration from leaves of wild pear (Pyrus communis var. pyraster L.). Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 59:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho LC, Goulao L, Oliveira C, Gonçalves JC, Amancio S (2004) RAPD assessment for identification of clonal identity and genetic stability of in vitro propagated chestnut hybrids. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 77:23–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassels AC, Curry FC (2001) Oxidative stress and physiological, epigenetic and genetic variability in plant tissue culture: implications for micropropagators and genetic engineers. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 64:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevreau E (2002) Pear biotechnology: recent progresses and future breeding applications. Acta Hortic 596:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevreau E, Mourgues F, Neveu M, Chevalier M (1997) Effect of gelling agents and antibiotics on adventitious bud regeneration from in vitro leaves of pear. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 33:173–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cinelli F, Loreti F, Muleo R (2004) Regeneration and selection of quince BA29 (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) somaclones tolerant to lime-induced chlorosis. Acta Hortic 658:573–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damiano C, Monticelli S, Frattarelli A, Nicolini S, Corazza L (1997) Somaclonal variability and in vitro regeneration of straberry. Acta Hortic 447:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarumath RM, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina NS (2002) RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of micropropagated plants of three diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China Type) and C. assamica spp. Assamica (Assam-India type). Plant Cell Rep 21:66–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolcet Sanjuan R, Mok D, Mok M (1991) In vitro manipulations of Pyrus species and Cydonia oblonga. Acta Hortic 300:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolcet Sanjuan R, Mok D, Mok M (1992) Characterisation and in vitro selection for iron efficiency in Pyrus and Cydonia. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 28:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12(1):13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto S, Thakur RC, Ishii K (1998) Determination of genetic stability in long-term micropropagated shoots of Pinus thunbergii Parl. using RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep 18:193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschlag FA (1996) Somaclonal variation. In: Hammershlag FA, Litz RE (eds) Biotechnology of perennial fruit crops. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 277–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabel N, Tremblay L, Michaud M, Tremblay FM, Bousquet J (1993) RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. Theor Appl Genet 86:81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DW, Iketani H, Hayashi T (1998) Shoot regeneration from cultured leaves of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 54:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation. A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Banks PM, Bhati R, Bretell RIS, Davis PA, Ryan SA, Scowcroft WR, Spindler LH, Tanner GJ (1989) From somatic variation to variant plants: mechanism and applications. Genome 31:705–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeppert RH (1986) Reaction of iron and carbonates in calcareous soils. J Plant Nut 9:195–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marino G, Beghelli F, Rombolà AD, Cabrini L (2000) In vitro performance at high pH and in vivo responses to Fe-deficiency of leaf-derived quince BA29 (Cydonia oblonga) somaclones regenerated at variable medium pH. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 75:433–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marino G, Bertazza G, Buscaroli C (1998) In vitro growth and tolerance to lime-induced iron chlorosis of leaf-derived cvs. Tomuri and Hayward kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) somaclones. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 73:670–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino G, Molendini L (2005) In vitro leaf-shoot regeneration and somaclone selection for sodium chloride tolerance in quince and pear. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 80:561–570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne D, Meyer R, Bradshaw JE, Baird E, Bonar N, Provan J, Powell W, Waugh R (1997) Comparison of PCR-based marker system for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato. Mol Breed 3:127–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muleo R, Cinelli F, Viti R (1995) Application of tissue culture on quince rootstock in iron-limiting conditions. J Plant Nutr 18:91–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CM, Mota M, Monte-Corvo L, Goulão A, Silva DM (1999) Molecular typing of Pyrus based on RAPD markers. Sci Hortic 79:163–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paci M (2004) Ecologia forestale. Calderini Ed Agricole edn, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganova V (2003) Taxonomic reliability of leaf and fruit morphological characteristics of the Pyrus L. taxa in Slovakia. Hort Sci (Prague) 30:98–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombi MA, Damiano C (2002) Comparison between RAPDs and SSRs molecular markers to detect genetic variation in kiwifruit [Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev]. Plant Cell Rep 20:1061–1066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pew XP, Deng XX (2005) Micropropagation of chestnut rose (Rosa roxburghii Tratt) and assessment of genetic stability in in vitro plants using RAPD and AFLP markers. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 80:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Predieri S (2001) Mutation induction and tissue culture in improving fruits. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 64:185–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quoirin M, Lepoivre P, Boxus PH (1977) Un premier bilan de 10 années de recherches sur les cultures de méristèmes et la multiplication in vitro de fruitiers ligneux, In: Compte Rendu des recherches 1976–1977. Station de cultures fruitières et maraîchères, pp 93–117

  • Rahman MH, Rajora OP (2001) Microsatellite DNA somaclonal variation in micropropagated trembling aspen (Populus deltoids). Plant Cell Rep 20:531–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani V, Parida A, Raina SN (1995) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for genetic analysis in micropropagated plants of Populus deltoides Marsh. Plant Cell Rep 14:459–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1992) NTSYS—PC: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 1.8. Applied Biostatistic Inc., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiliró E, Predieri S, Bertaccini A (2001) Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to detect genetic variation in Pyrus species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 19:271a-h

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, Reustle G, Zyprian E (1996) Detection of somaclonal variation in grapevine regenerants from protoplast by RAPD-PCR. Vitis 35:99–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seliskar DM, Gallagher JL (2000) Exploiting wild population diversity and somaclonal variation in the salt marsh grass Distichlis spicata (Poaceae) for marsh creation and restoration. Am J Bot 87:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin RM, McPheeters KD, Norton M (1994) Sources and frequency of somaclonal variation. Hort Sci 29:1232–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practices of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Soneji JR, Cotrim H, Mhatre M (2002) Somaclonal variation in micropropagated dormant axillary buds of pineapple (Ananas comosus L., Merr.). J Hort Sci Biotechnol 77:28–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan BR, Wagner I, Keinschmit J (2003) Euroforgen technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for wild apple and pear (Malus sylvestris and Pyrus pyraster). IPGRI. Euroforgen Noble Hardwoods Networks

  • Vendrame WA, Kochert G, Wetzstein HY (1999) AFLP analysis of variation in pecan somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep 18:853–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 22:6531–6535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, YP, Uyemoto JK, Kirkpatrick BC (1998) A small-scale procedure for extracting nucleic acids from woody plants infected with various phytopathogens for PCR assay. J Virol Meth 71:45–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu LH, Welander M (2000) Adventitious shoot regeneration of two dwarfing pear rootstocks and development of a transformation protocol. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 75:745–752

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Antonietta Palombi.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Puigdoménech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palombi, M.A., Lombardo, B. & Caboni, E. In vitro regeneration of wild pear (Pyrus pyraster Burgsd) clones tolerant to Fe-chlorosis and somaclonal variation analysis by RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep 26, 489–496 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0256-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0256-9

Keywords

Navigation