Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-world effectiveness of golimumab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis and an inadequate response to initial TNFi therapy in Greece: the GO-BEYOND prospective, observational study

  • Observational Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of golimumab (GLM) on remission or low disease activity (LDA) was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or severe axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), who failed previous treatment for their rheumatic disease with one initial tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi). This is a multicenter, prospective, real-world observational 18-month study, conducted in Greece. The primary endpoint, assessed at 6 months, included the proportion of patients attaining LDA and/or remission (Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] ≤ 3.2), minimal disease activity (MDA; MDA criteria), and moderate disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] score 4–7), respectively. Other endpoints evaluated the persistence to GLM treatment and its impact on patients’ work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] instrument) and quality of life (QoL; EuroQoL5 dimensions 3 levels [EQ-5D-3L] questionnaire). Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Kaplan–Meier method were used for analyses. At 6 months, LDA was achieved by 46.4% of patients with RA, MDA by 57.1% of patients with PsA, and BASDAI 4–7 by 24.1% of patients with axSpA. For all study patients, persistence rates on GLM were high (85.1–93.7%) over 18 months; all WPAI domain scores and the EQ-5D-3L index score improved significantly (p < 0.001) from baseline to 18 months. GLM treatment was effective in patients with RA, PsA, or axSpA who had failed previous treatment with one TNFi and led to significant WPAI and QoL improvements. Persistence rates were high. Trial registration number and date of registration: As per the local regulations the study has been registered at the national registry for non-interventional studies https://www.dilon.sfee.gr/studiesp_d.php?meleti_id=MK8259-6995.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. There are circumstances that may prevent MSD Greece from sharing the requested data.

Code availability

All data were analyzed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

References

  1. Krüger K, Burmester GR, Wassenberg S, Bohl-Bühler M, Thomas MH (2018) Effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis under real-life clinical conditions: non-interventional GO-NICE study in Germany. BMJ Open 8(6):e021082. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021082

  2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB (2016) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 388(10055):2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veale DJ, Fearon U (2018) The pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis. Lancet 391(10136):2273–2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30830-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D (2017) Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet 390(10089):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Michelsen B, Fiane R, Diamantopoulos AP et al (2015) A comparison of disease burden in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. PLoS One 10(4): e0123582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123582

  6. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ et al (2020) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 79(6):685–699. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A et al (2020) EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 79(6):700–712. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R et al (2017) 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 76(6):978–991. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubbert-Roth A, Szabó MZ, Kedves M, Nagy G, Atzeni F, Sarzi-Puttini P (2019) Failure of anti-TNF treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The pros and cons of the early use of alternative biological agents. Autoimmun Rev 18(12):102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102398

  10. Alten R, Conaghan PG, Strand V et al (2019) Unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy: results from a large multinational real-world study. Clin Rheumatol 38(6):1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04446-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Juanola X, Ramos MJM, Belzunegui JM, Fernández-Carballido C, Gratacós J (2022) Treatment failure in axial spondyloarthritis: insights for a standardized definition. Adv Ther 39(4):1490–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02064-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Strand V, Miller P, Williams SA, Saunders K, Grant S, Kremer J (2017) Discontinuation of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis from the corrona RA registry. Rheumatol Ther 4(2):489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-017-0078-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stober C, Ye W, Guruparan T, Htut E, Clunie G, Jadon D (2018) Prevalence and predictors of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor persistence in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 57(1):158–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manica SR, Sepriano A, Pimentel-Santos F et al (2020) Effectiveness of switching between TNF inhibitors in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: is the reason to switch relevant? Arthritis Res Ther 22(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02288-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Choquette D, Bessette L, Alemao E et al (2019) Persistence rates of abatacept and TNF inhibitors used as first or second biologic DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 9 years of experience from the Rhumadata® clinical database and registry. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1917-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gossec L, Siebert S, Bergmans P et al (2021) Persistence and effectiveness of the IL-12/23 pathway inhibitor ustekinumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 1-year results from the real-world PsABio Study. Ann Rheum Dis 81(6):823–830. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bekele DI, Cheng E, Reimold A et al (2022) Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) persistence and reasons for discontinuation in a predominantly male cohort with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Int 42(11):1925–1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05024-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. European Medicines Agency. Simponi Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/simponi-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 06 June 2023

  19. Flipo RM, Tubach F, Goupille P et al (2021) Real-life persistence of golimumab in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results of the 2-year observational GO-PRACTICE study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 39(3):537–545. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/zizo0l

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alegre-Sancho JJ, Juanola X, Rodríguez-Heredia JM et al (2021) Effectiveness and persistence of golimumab as a second biological drug in patients with spondyloarthritis: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(13):e25223. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025223

  21. Iannone F, Favalli EG, Caporali R et al (2021) Golimumab effectiveness in biologic inadequate responding patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis in real-life from the Italian registry GISEA. Joint Bone Spine 88(1):105062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.07.011

  22. Akar S, Kalyoncu U, Dalkilic E et al (2021) GO-BEYOND: a real-world study of persistence of golimumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey. Immunotherapy 13(10):841–850. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2020-0296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krüger K, Burmester GR, Wassenberg S, Thomas MH (2020) Golimumab as the first-, second-, or at least third-line biologic agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis: post hoc analysis of a noninterventional study in Germany. Rheumatol Ther 7(2):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00204-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Michelsen B, Sexton J, Wierød A, Bakland G, Rødevand E, Krøll F, Kvien TK (2020) Four-year follow-up of inflammatory arthropathy patients treated with golimumab: Data from the observational multicentre NOR-DMARD study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 50(1):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. D'Angelo S, Tirri E, Giardino AM et al (2022) Effectiveness of Golimumab as Second Anti-TNFα Drug in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis in Italy: GO-BEYOND, a Prospective Real-World Observational Study. J Clin Med 11(14):4178. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144178

  26. Anderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J et al (2012) Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64(5):640–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mease PJ, Coates LC (2018) Considerations for the definition of remission criteria in psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47(6):786–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2286–2291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fransen J, van Riel PL (2005) The disease activity score and the EULAR response criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(5 Suppl 39):S93–S99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Machado P, Landewé R, Lie E et al (2011) Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis 70(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.138594

  31. Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Brandt J et al (2004) Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor α blockers in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:665–670. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.016386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kiltz U, van der Heiijde D, Boonen A et al (2015) Development of a health index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS HI): final result of a global initiative based on the ICF guided by ASAS. Ann Rheum Dis 74(5):830–835. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM (1993) The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 4(5):353–365. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2015) Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11(5):276–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahman P, Zummer M, Bessette L, et al (2017) Real-world validation of the minimal disease activity index in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis from a prospective, observational, biological treatment registry. BMJ Open 7(8):e016619. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016619

  36. Krueger K, Remstedt S, Thiele A, Hohenberger S (2020) Golimumab improves patient-reported outcomes in daily practice of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. J Comp Eff Res 9(12):891–902. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Krüger K, Burmester GR, Wassenberg S, Bohl-Bühler M, Thomas MH (2019) Patient-reported outcomes with golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: non-interventional study GO-NICE in Germany. Rheumatol Int 39(1):131–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4180-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dimitrios Zisopoulos, Michail P. Migkos, Ilias Bournazos, Eleni Kteniadaki for their assistance and feedback.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) Greece. The sponsor did not have any involvement at all stage of the research and submission, except providing funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work; Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: EP, DB; acquisition and interpretation of data and writing: PA, DP, AG, GK, AT, SG, PS, MT, AB, AK, PV, GS, DV; analysis of data: ZH. All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, approved final version of manuscript to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All co-authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelia Petrikkou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Prodromos Sidiropoulos has received support for the present manuscript from MSD, in addition to research grants from Pfizer, Genesis, UCB, GSK, MSD, Abbvie, Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly and Amgen. He has also received consultation payments from Pfizer, Abbvie and Eli Lilly, and honoraria from Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Novartis and Eli Lilly. He has received support for attending a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis and Eli Lilly. Dr Dimitrios Vassilopoulos has received support for the present manuscript from MSD. Dr Periklis Vounotrypidis has received support for the present manuscript from MSD, in addition to research grants from Abbvie, Genesis pharma and Novartis. Dr Andreas Bounas has received support for the present manuscript from MSD, in addition to grants or contracts from Abbvie, Amgen, Genesis, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. He has also received honoraria from Abbvie, Aeonorasis, Amgen, Bausch Health, Faran, Genesis, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, as well as for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Abbvie, Aeonorasis, Amgen, Bausch Health, Faran, Genesis, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Dr Anna Kandyli has received consultation payments from Abbvie, Mylan and Genesis, as well as honoraria from Abbvie and Novartis. She has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from UCB, and for participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Genesis and Amgen. Dr Gkikas Katsifis has received honoraria from Abbvie, Aenorasis, Amgen, Janssen, Jenessis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Sobi, Roche, Pfizer and UCB. Also, the author has received support for attending meetings from AbbVie, Sandoz, Roche, UCB, and Lilly, and for his participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from ELPEN. Dr Grigorios Sakellariou has received support for the present manuscript from MSD, as well as research grants for education activities from Pfizer, Genesis, UCB, GSK, and MSD, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbvie and MSD. Dr Maria Tektonidou has received support for the present manuscript from MSD, as well as research grants from Genesis, UCB, GSK, MSD, and Amgen, and consultation payments from Genesis, GSK, Novartis and EI Lilly. Zhiping Huang is an employee of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and Evangelia Petrikkou is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, who owns stock and/or hold stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Drs Panagiotis Athanassiou, Dimitrios Psaltis, Athanasios Georgiadis, Athina Theodoridou, Souzana Gazi, and Dimitrios Bounas have declared no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the EU Directive 2001/20/EC section for non-interventional studies and the applicable laws and regulations of Greece. All included patients provided written informed consent before study entry. The present study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki declaration of 1964, and its later amendments. The study was approved by the competent Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of all participating hospital sites. Participation of private practice investigators was approved by the IRB of a participating hospital located in the same geographic region as the Private Practice. Specifically, the IRBs that reviewed and approved the study, and corresponding ethical review reference numbers include IRB of “Laiko” General Hospital (reference number: 6046/24-Apr-2018), IRB of “KAT” Regional General Hospital (reference number: 188/14-Jun-2018), IRB of Private Practice under “Laiko” General Hospital (reference number: 59/15-Feb-2018), IRB of University General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete (reference number: 17991/22-Nov-2018), IRB of “Olympion”Rehabilitation Center of Patras (reference number: 14-Mar-2018), IRB of Private Practice under University General Hospital of Ioannina (reference number: 5th/08-Apr-2018), IRB of Private Practice under European Interbalkan Medical Center (reference number 17-Jan-2018), IRB of Private Practice under European Interbalkan Medical Center (reference number 22-Jan-2019), IRB of “Attikon” University General Hospital (reference number 5th/29-May-2018), IRB of “Ag. Pavlos” of Thessaloniki (reference number: 123/08-Mar-2018), IRB of “Ippokrateio”General Hospital of Athens (reference number: 4552/19-Mar-2018), IRB of Naval Hospital of Athens (reference number: 3/18/02-Apr-2018).

Consent to participate

All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Consent to publish

All participants provided consent for publication of the material collected in the context of this study in a non-identifiable manner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dimitrios T. Boumpas: Lead Author.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athanassiou, P., Psaltis, D., Georgiadis, A. et al. Real-world effectiveness of golimumab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis and an inadequate response to initial TNFi therapy in Greece: the GO-BEYOND prospective, observational study. Rheumatol Int 43, 1871–1883 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05376-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05376-5

Keywords

Navigation