Skip to main content

Leflunomide treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Abstract

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood resulting in disability in untreated cases. Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs form the first-line treatment in JIA. However, the data about leflunomide (LFN) in treatment of JIA is limited. We reviewed the medical files of JIA patients who were followed-up regularly and had received LFN. A total of 38 patients were included to the study. Among them, 24 had oligoarticular JIA, eleven had polyarticular JIA, two had ERA and one had psoriatic arthritis. 36 were initially treated with methotrexate and two patients diagnosed with ERA were treated with sulfasalazine. Sulfasalazine treatment was switched to LFN due to inadequate response at the 3rd month of therapy. Methotrexate was ceased due to gastrointestinal intolerance in 36 patients. Of these 36 patients, 19 patients had either low disease activity (n = 13) or remission (n = 6). LFN was administered to 13 patients with low disease activity. During the follow-up of the six patients in remission, relapse ensued and LFN treatment was started. The remaining 17 patients had moderate (n = 10) or high (n = 7) disease activity requiring biologic agents. But due to inadequate response to biologic agents, LFN was added to the therapy. All of the patients were clinically inactive at the last visit. Only two adverse events resolving within 2 weeks were noted (Lymphopenia = 1, elevated liver enzymes = 1). LFN may be an alternative therapy in case of MTX intolerance or toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, International League of Associations for R et al (2004) International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheum 31:390–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Cron RQ, DeWitt EM, Ilowite NT et al (2011) 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63:465–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ringold S, Weiss PF, Colbert RA, DeWitt EM, Lee T, Onel K, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Research Committee of the Childhood A, Rheumatology Research A et al (2014) Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus treatment plans for new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:1063–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML et al (2019) 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: therapeutic Approaches for Non-Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:846–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman E, Spiegel L, Hawkins D, Petty R, Goldsmith D, Schanberg L et al (2005) Long-term open-label preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of leflunomide in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 52:554–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McErlane F, Beresford MW, Baildam EM, Chieng SE, Davidson JE, Foster HE et al (2013) Validity of a three-variable juvenile arthritis disease activity score in children with new-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 72:1983–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Demirkaya E, Consolaro A, Sonmez HE, Giancane G, Simsek D, Ravelli A (2016) Current research in outcome measures for pediatric rheumatic and autoinflammatory diseases. Curr Rheumatol Rep 18:8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akkoc Y, Karatepe AG, Akar S, Kirazli Y, Akkoc N (2005) A Turkish version of the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index: reliability and validity. Rheumatol Int 25:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yalcinkaya F, Ozen S, Ozcakar ZB, Aktay N, Cakar N, Duzova A et al (2009) A new set of criteria for the diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever in childhood. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48:395–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silverman E, Mouy R, Spiegel L, Jung LK, Saurenmann RK, Lahdenne P et al (2005) Leflunomide or methotrexate for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 352:1655–1666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao JS, Wu H, Tian J (2003) Treatment of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis with combination of leflunomide and methotrexate. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 41:435–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chickermane PR, Khubchandani RP (2015) Evaluation of the benefits of sequential addition of leflunomide in patients with polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis failing standard dose methotrexate. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33:287–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alcantara AC, Leite CA, Leite AC, Sidrim JJ, Silva FS Jr, Rocha FA (2014) A longterm prospective real-life experience with leflunomide in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 41:338–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Molina C, Modesto C, Martin-Begue N, Arnal C (2013) Leflunomide, a valid and safe drug for the treatment of chronic anterior uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 32:1673–1675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bichler J, Benseler SM, Krumrey-Langkammerer M, Haas JP, Hugle B (2015) Leflunomide is associated with a higher flare rate compared to methotrexate in the treatment of chronic uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 44:280–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smolen JS, Kalden JR, Scott DL, Rozman B, Kvien TK, Larsen A, Loew-Friedrich I, Oed C, Rosenburg R (1999) Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. European Leflunomide Study Group. Lancet 353:259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NAA wrote and revised the paper and together with SGK interpreted the data and formulated conclusions. HES and AT also wrote the statistical analysis plan, cleaned and analyzed the data, and revised each draft. FÇ and MÇ was involved with study design and recruitment. All authors approved the final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Aktay Ayaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the ethical review committee of Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital.

Informed consent

All these patient files were evaluated retrospectively and all patients were anonymous. When the patients admitted to the hospital, the parents gave a general consent approving anonymous data use for academic purpose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayaz, N.A., Karadağ, Ş.G., Çakmak, F. et al. Leflunomide treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int 39, 1615–1619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04385-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04385-7

Keywords

  • Leflunomide
  • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis