Abstract
To study the clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of southern Chinese patients with Takayasu’s arteritis (TA). This is a retrospective chart review study of 78 patients managed in 14 public hospitals in Hong Kong between the years 2000 and 2010. Patients were identified from the hospital registry using the ICD-10 diagnostic code of the disease. The classification of TA was based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or modified Ichikawa’s criteria. Demographic data, clinical presentation, angiographic findings, pattern of vascular involvement (Numano’s classification), treatment and outcome of these patients were presented. 78 patients were studied (82% women, age at presentation 34.2 ± 14 years). The estimated point prevalence of TA was 11/million population. The commonest initial manifestations were hypertension (62%) and vascular ischemic symptoms (38%). Systemic symptoms occurred in nine (12%) patients only. The proportion of patients fulfilling the angiographic subtypes of the Numano’s classification was: types I (13%), IIa (4%), IIb (12%), III (12%), IV (20%) and V (39%), respectively. Thirty-two patients (41%) were treated with high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) and 22 patients (28%) received additional non-GC immunosuppressive drugs. Vascular complications occurred in 26 (33%) patients and revascularization surgery was performed in 23(29%) patients. Three (4%) patients died of vascular complication at a median of 8 years after disease onset. TA is rare in southern Chinese patients of Hong Kong. Most patients present with ischemic symptoms during the stenotic phase of the disease. Although mortality is low, a significant proportion of patients developed vascular stenosis that required surgical interventions. More awareness of TA as a differential diagnosis of non-specific systemic symptoms with elevated inflammatory markers in younger patients is needed for earlier diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johannes WJ, Bijlsma (2009) EULAR compendium on rheumatic diseases. Skin and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. BMJ Publishing Group, London, pp 420–443
Serra R, Butrico L, Fugetto F, Chibireva MD, Malva A, De Caridi G et al (2016) Updates in Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of Takayasu arteritis. Ann Vasc Surg 35:210–225
Mishima Y (2001) Leriche memorial lecture at 24th World Congress: Takayasu’s arteritis in Asia. Cardiovasc Surg 9:3–10
Ohigashi H, Haraguchi G, Konishi M, Tezuka D, Kamiishi T, Ishihara T et al (2012) Improved Prognosis of Takayasu arteritis over the past decade—comprehensive analysis of 106 patients. Circ J 76:1004–1011
Cong XL, Dai SM, Feng X, Wang ZW, Lu QS, Yuan LX et al (2010) Takayasu’s arteritis: clinical features and outcomes of 125 patients in China. Clin Rheumatol 29:973–981
Li J, Li H, Sun F, Chen Z, Yang Y, Zhao J et al (2017) Clinical characteristics of heart involvement in chinese patients with Takayasu arteritis. J Rheumatol 44:1867–1874
Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, Hunder GG, Calabrese LH, Edworthy SM et al (1990) The American College of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 33:1129–1134
ISHIKAWA K (1988) Diagnostic approach and proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Takayasu’s arteriopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:964–972
Hata A, Noda M, Moriwaki R, Numano F (1996) Angiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: new classification. Int J Cardiol 54:S155–S163
Onen F, Akkoc N (2017) Epidemiology of Takayasu arteritis. Press Med 46:e197–e203
Watts R, Al-Taiar A, Mooney J, Scott D, Macgregor A (2009) The epidemiology of Takayasu arteritis in the UK. Rheumatology 48:1008–1011
Goel R, Danda D, Joseph G, Ravindran R, Kumar S, Jayaseelan V et al (2018) Long-term outcome of 251 patients with Takayasu arteritis on combination immunosuppressant therapy: single centre experience from a large tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47:718–726
Park MC, Lee SW, Park YB, Chung NS, Lee SK (2005) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Takayasu’s arteritis: analysis of 108 patients using standardized criteria for diagnosis, activity assessment, and angiographic classification. Scand J Rheumatol 34:284–292
Khor CG, Tan BE, Kan SL, Tsang EE, Lim AL, Chong EY et al (2016) Takayasu arteritis in major rheumatology centres in Malaysia. J Clin Rheumatol 22:194–197
Moriwaki R, Noda M, Yajima M, Sharma BK, Numano F (1997) Clinical manifestations of Takayasu arteritis in India and Japan-new classification of angiographic findings. Angiology 48:369–379
Park SJ, Kim HJ, Park H, Hann HJ, Kim KH, Han S et al (2017) Incidence, prevalence, mortality and causes of death in Takayasu arteritis in Korea—a nationwide, population-based study. Int J Cardiol 235:100–104
Watanabe Y, Miyata T, Tanemoto K (2015) Current clinical features of new patients with Takayasu arteritis observed from cross-country research in Japan: age and sex specificity. Circulation 132:1701–1709
Lim AY, Lee GY, Jang SY, Gwag HB, Choi SH, Jeon ES et al (2015) Gender differences in clinical and angiographic findings of patients with Takayasu arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33:S132–S137
Kerr GS, Hallahan CW, Giordano J, Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Rottem M et al (1994) Takayasu arteritis. Ann Intern Med 120:919–929
Arnaud L, Haroche J, Limal N, Toledano D, Gambotti L, Costedoat Chalumeau N et al (2010) Takayasu arteritis in France: a single-center retrospective study of 82 cases comparing white, North African, and black patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 89:1–17
Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C, Besson FL, Bley TA, Blockmans D et al (2018)) EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 77:636–643
Kato Y, Terashima M, Ohigashi H, Tezuka D, Ashikaga T, Hirao K et al (2015) Vessel wall inflammation of Takayasu arteritis detected by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: association with disease distribution and activity. PLoS One 10(12):e0145855
Grayson PC, Alehashemi S, Bagheri AA, Civelek AC, Cupps TR, Kaplan MJ et al (2018) 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker in a prospective, longitudinal cohort of patients with large vessel vasculitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 70:439–449
Nakagomi D, Cousins C, Sznajd J, Furuta S, Mohammad AJ, Luqmani R et al (2017) Development of a score for assessment of radiologic damage in large-vessel vasculitis (Combined Arteritis Damage Score, CARDS). Clin Exp Rheumatol 35:139–145
Jiang L, Li D, Yan F, Dai X, Li Y, Ma L (2012) Evaluation of Takayasu arteritis activity by delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol 155:262–267
Misra R, Danda D, Rajappa SM, Ghosh A, Gupta R, Mahendranath KM et al (2013) Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). Rheumatology (Oxford) 52:1795–801
Aydin SZ, Yilmaz N, Akar S, Aksu K, Kamali S, Yucel E et al (2010) Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis with disease extent index-Takayasu. Rheumatology 49:1889–1893
Direskeneli H (2017) Clinical assessment in Takayasu’s arteritis: major challenges and controversies. Clin Exp Rheumatol 35:189–193
Suwanwela N, Piyachon C (1996) Takayasu arteritis in Thailand: clinical and imaging features. Int J Cardiol 54:S117–S134
Jain S, Kumari S, Ganguly NK, Sharma BK (1996) Current status of Takayasu arteritis in India. Int J Cardiol 54:S111–S116
Li J, Zhu M, Li M, Zheng W, Zhao J, Tian X et al (2016) Cause of death in Chinese Takayasu arteritis patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e 4069
Nakaoka Y, Isobe M, Takei S, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, Yokota S et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in Japan (the TAKT study). Ann Rhem Dis 77:348–354
Samson M, Espígol-Frigolé G, Terrades-García N, Prieto-González S, Corbera-Bellalta M, Alba-Rovira R et al (2018) Biological treatments in giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Eur J Intern Med 50:12–19
Novikov PI, Smitienko IO, Sokolova MV, Alibaz-Oner F, Kaymaz-Tahra S, Direskeneli H et al (2018) Certolizumab pegol in the treatment of Takayasu arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) (Epub ahead of print)
Funding
Funding of this project and writing assistance: Nil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Study design: Dr. MCC, Dr. KWL. Data collection and interpretation: Dr. WPYS, Dr. MCC, Dr. LCS, Dr. YML, Dr. LST, Dr. YKY, Dr. NWL, Dr. NKH, Dr. LMH, Dr. LTY, Dr. TCH, Dr. LKL, Dr. WMC, Dr. YKL, Dr. WCHP, Dr. SCK, Dr. LKF, Dr. KWL. Statistical analyses of data: Dr. WPYS, Dr. MCC.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
New Territories West Cluster Research and Ethics Committee, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong (date of approval: 29-8-2011; NTWC/CREC/967/11). All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
All authors did not have any conflict of interests to be declared.
Additional information
All authors are the members of Takayasu's arteritis study group.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, S.P.Y., Mok, C.C., Lau, C.S. et al. Clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of Takayasu’s arteritis in southern Chinese: a multicenter retrospective study. Rheumatol Int 38, 2263–2270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4150-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4150-x