The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, content, and quality of videos for patients available on YouTube for learning how to self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) injections. We searched for the terms Humira injection, Enbrel injection, Simponi injection, and Cimzia injection. Videos were categorised as useful information, misleading information, useful patient opinion, and misleading patient opinion by two physicians. Videos were rated for quality on a 5-point global quality scale (GQS; 1 = poor quality, 5 = excellent quality) and reliability and content using the 5-point DISCERN scale (higher scores represent greater reliability and more comprehensive videos). Of the 142 English videos, 24 (16.9%) videos were classified as useful information, 6 (4.2%) as misleading information, 47 (33.1%) as useful patient opinion, and 65 (45.8%) as misleading patient opinion. Useful videos were the most comprehensive and had the highest reliability and quality scores. The useful information and useful patient opinion videos had the highest numbers of views per day (median 8.32, IQR: 3.40–14.28 and 5.46, IQR: 3.06–14.44), as compared with 2.32, IQR: 1.63–6.26 for misleading information videos and 2.15, IQR: 1.17–7.43 for misleading patient opinion videos (p = 0.001). Almost all (91.5%) misleading videos were uploaded by individual users. There are a substantial number of English-language YouTube videos, with high quality, and rich content and reliability that can be sources of information on proper technique of anti-TNF self-injections. Physicians should direct patients to the reliable resources of information and educate them in online resource assessment, thereby improving treatment outcomes.
Anti-TNF agent injection Patient education Internet YouTube
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Yusuf Celik PhD (Department of Biostatistics of Biruni University, Turkey) for the support in biostatistics.
ST: designed study, analysed data, and drafted paper. OVY: analysed data and drafted paper. BB: drafted paper. AR: analysed data and drafted paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. So there is no need for ethical approval.
Schwartzman S, Morgan GJ Jr (2004) Does route of administration affect the outcome of TNF antagonist therapy? Arthritis Res Ther 6(Suppl 2):S19–S23 (Epub 2004 Jun 21)Google Scholar
Sylwestrzak G, Liu J, Stephenson JJ, Ruggieri AP, DeVries A (2014) Considering patient preferences when selecting anti-tumor necrosis factor therapeutic options. Am Health Drug Benefits 7:71–81PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Le Gall C, Jacques E, Medjebeur C, Darques L, Briand F, Haddad J, Bleichner G (2006) Low molecular weight heparin self-injection training: assessment of feasibility, tolerance and economic analysis in emergency departments. Eur J Emerg Med 13(5):264–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):105–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S (2007) A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 102(9):2070–2077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Arnetz JE, Almin I, Bergström K, Franzen Y, Nilsson H (2004) Active patient involvement in the establishment of physical therapy goals: effects on treatment outcome and quality of care. Adv Physiother 6(2):50–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachmani R, Levi Z, Slavachevski I, Avin M, Ravid M (2002) Teaching patients to monitor their risk factors retards the progression of vascular complications in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—a randomized prospective study. Diabet Med 19(5):385–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fox S (2006) Online Health Search 2006: most internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online. Very few check the source and date of the findings. Paw Internet Am Life Proj 2006:1–22Google Scholar