Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36) among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore

Abstract

The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) is a popular health-related quality of life (HrQoL) tool. However, few studies have assessed its psychometric properties in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). We therefore aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the SF-36 in patients with SpA in Singapore. Cross-sectional data from a registry of 196 SpA patients recruited from a dedicated tertiary referral clinic in Singapore from 2011 to 2014 was used. Analyses were guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments framework. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was assessed through 33 a priori hypotheses by correlations of the eight subscales and two summary scores of SF-36 with other health outcomes. Known-group construct validity was assessed by comparison of the means of the subscales and summary scores of the SF-36 of SpA patients and the general population of Singapore using student’s t tests. Among 196 patients (155 males (79.0 %), median (range) age: 36 (17–70), 166 Chinese (84.6 %)), SF-36 scales showed high internal consistency ranging from 0.88 to 0.90. Convergent construct validity was supported as shown by fulfillment of all hypotheses. Divergent construct validity was supported, as SF-36 MCS was not associated with PGA, pain and HAQ. Known-group construct validity showed SpA patients had lower scores of 3.8–12.5 when compared to the general population at p < 0.001. This study supports the SF-36 as a valid and reliable measure of HrQoL for use in patients with SpA at a single time point.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Braun J (2006) Concepts and epidemiology of spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20(3):401–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Castro MP, Stebbings SM, Milosavljevic S, Bussey MD (2015) Construct validity of clinical spinal mobility tests in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol

  3. 3.

    Braun J, Kiltz U, Sarholz M, Heldmann F, Regel A, Baraliakos X (2015) Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis: clinically useful markers and prediction of clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 11(8):935–946

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu Y, Cortinovis D, Stone MA (2004) Recent advances in the treatment of the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16(4):357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    van Tubergen A, Black PM, Coteur G (2015) Are patient-reported outcome instruments for ankylosing spondylitis fit for purpose for the axial spondyloarthritis patient? A qualitative and psychometric analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 54(10):1842–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Branco JC, Rodrigues AM, Gouveia N, Eusebio M, Ramiro S, Machado PM et al (2016) Prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and their impact on health-related quality of life, physical function and mental health in Portugal: results from EpiReumaPt- a national health survey. RMD Open 2(1):e000166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sengupta S, Ray J, Ghosh B (2015) Quality of Life and Clinical Response to On-Demand Maintenance Doses of Infliximab in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Clin Rheumatol 21(7):355–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tian-hui C, Lu L, Michael MK (2005) A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 6(9):936–940

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Packham JC, Jordan KP, Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Healey EL (2012) Evaluation of ankylosing spondylitis quality of life Questionnaire: responsiveness of a new patient-reported outcome measure. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 51(4):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Amouretti M, Le Pen C, Gaudin AF, Bommelaer G, Frexinos J, Ruszniewski P et al (2006) Impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30(2):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hall T, Krahn GL, Horner-Johnson W, Lamb G (2011) Examining functional content in widely used health-related quality of life scales. Rehabil Psychol 56(2):94–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Luo MP, Wong RL (2011) Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Leung YY, Ho KW, Zhu TY, Tam LS, Kun EW, Li EK (2010) Testing scaling assumptions, reliability and validity of medical outcomes study short-form 36 health survey in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 49(8):1495–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL et al (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19(4):539–549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    van der Linden S, Akkoc N, Brown MA, Robinson PC, Khan MA (2015) The ASAS criteria for axial spondyloarthritis: strengths, weaknesses, and proposals for a way forward. Curr Rheumatol Rep 17(9):62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Chou CT et al (2011) The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 70(1):25–31

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hays RD, Morales LS (2001) The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med 33(5):350–357

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bruce B, Fries JF (2003) The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Quinzanos I, Luong PT, Bobba S, Steuart Richards J, Majithia V, Davis LA et al (2015) Validation of disease activity and functional status questionnaires in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33(2):146–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Curran D, Molenberghs G, Fayers PM, Machin D (1998) Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: missing forms. Stat Med 17(5–7):697–709

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4(4):293–307

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cook DA, Beckman TJ (2006) Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 119(2):166e7–166e166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Morera OF, Stokes SM (2016) Coefficient alpha as a measure of test score reliability: review of 3 popular misconceptions. Am J Public Health 106(3):458–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bryant FB (2000) Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Leung YY, Tam LS, Kun EW, Ho KW, Li EK (2008) Comparison of 4 functional indexes in psoriatic arthritis with axial or peripheral disease subgroups using Rasch analyses. J Rheumatol 35(8):1613–1621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pimentel-Santos FM, Pinto T, Santos H, Barcelos A, Cunha I, Branco JC et al (2012) Portuguese version of the bath indexes for ankylosing spondylitis patients: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Clin Rheumatol 31(2):341–346

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Akad K, Solmaz D, Sari I, Onen F, Akkoc N, Akar S (2013) Performance of response scales of activity and functional measures of ankylosing spondylitis: numerical rating scale versus visual analog scale. Rheumatol Int 33(10):2617–2623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Radner H, Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2014) Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: benefit over low disease activity in patient-reported outcomes and costs. Arthritis Res Ther 16(1):R56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thumboo J, Wu Y, Tai ES, Gandek B, Lee J, Ma S et al (2013) Reliability and validity of the english (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic urban Asian population in Singapore. Qual Res 22(9):2501–2508

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    van Tuyl LH, Boers M (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11(12):705–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ra Y-A, Kim WH (2016) Impact of employment and age on quality of life of individuals with disabilities: a multilevel analysis. Rehabil Couns Bull 59(2):112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jung S, Lee S (2011) Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. Behav Res Method 43(3):701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Thumboo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwan, Y.H., Fong, W.W.S., Lui, N.L. et al. Validity and reliability of the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36) among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore. Rheumatol Int 36, 1759–1765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3567-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Spondyloarthritis
  • Singapore
  • Psychometric
  • Validity
  • Reliability