Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of self-report and objective measures of physical activity in US adults with osteoarthritis

  • Food for Thought
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe levels of daily physical activity and examine the extent of agreement between self-reported and objectively measured indices of physical activity, and characteristics associated with under or overestimated physical activity among persons with osteoarthritis (OA). Using cross-sectional data from the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we identified 533 adults ≥45 years of age with self-reported OA who completed physical activity questionnaires and had accelerometry data collected using Actigraph AM-7164. Average daily minutes of moderate to vigorous activity and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) using self-reported and objective measures were compared across sociodemographic and clinical subgroups and Spearman’s rank correlations were calculated. Differences between self-reported and objectively measured moderate to vigorous activity across various personal characteristics were also estimated. Most persons with OA were non-Hispanic white (87.9 %) and women (68.9 %) with an average age of 65 years old. Self-reported measure of daily moderate to vigorous activity was on average 7 min higher compared to objective measure (17.9 vs. 10.8 min/day). Correlations between self-reported and objective measures across sociodemographic groups were mostly weak to moderate ranging from 0.01 to 0.48. Participants with higher education and better self-reported health status were more likely to over-estimate their moderate to vigorous activity using self-reported measures. Measurement methods and sociodemographic and health factors are associated with differences in reporting physical activity among persons with OA. Future research examining relationships between physical activity and health outcomes in OA should be aware of measurement issues and differences of reporting in subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reginster JY (2002) The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41(Supp 1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA et al (2008) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58:26–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al (2014) OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22:363–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jevsevar DS (2013) Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:571–576 (2nd edition)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J et al (2012) American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64(4):465–474 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White DK, Tudor-Locke C, Felson DT, Gross KD, Niu J, Nevitt M et al (2013) Walking to meet physical activity guidelines in knee osteoarthritis: is 10,000 steps enough? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(4):711–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Øiestad BE, Quinn E, White D, Roemer F, Guermazi A, Nevitt M et al (2015) No association between daily walking and knee structural changes in people at risk of or with mild knee osteoarthritis. Prospective data from the multicenter osteoarthritis study. J Rheumatol 42(9):1685–1693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu S-H, Waring ME, Eaton CB, Lapane KL, Eaton CB (2015) Association of objectively measured physical activity and metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 67(10):1371–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR (2004) Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1637–1645

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS (2006) Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:2173–2181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ (2014) Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med 48(3):197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M (2008) A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pietrosimone B, Thomas AC, Saliba SA, Ingersoll CD (2014) Association between quadriceps strength and self-reported physical activity in people with knee osteoarthritis. Int J Sports Phys Ther 9(3):320–328 (Indianapolis, Indiana: Sports Physical Therapy Section)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunlop DD, Song J, Semanik PA, Sharma L, Chang RW (2011) Physical activity levels and functional performance in the osteoarthritis initiative: a graded relationship. Arthritis Rheum 63(1):127–136 (NIH Public Access)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Racunica TL, Teichtahl AJ, Wang Y, Wluka AE, English DR, Giles GG et al (2007) Effect of physical activity on articular knee joint structures in community-based adults. Arthritis Care Res 57(7):1261–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabia S, van Hees VT, Shipley MJ, Trenell MI, Hagger-Johnson G, Elbaz A et al (2014) Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol 179(6):781–790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerin E, Cain KL, Oyeyemi AL, Owen N, Conway TL, Cochrane T et al (2016) Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. Med Sci Sport Exerc. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schuna JMJ, Johnson WD, Tudor-Locke C (2013) Adult self-reported and objectively monitored physical activity and sedentary behavior: NHANES 2005–2006. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, Goode AP, Jordan JM (2014) A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum 43(6):701–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. March LM, Schwarz JM, Carfrae BH, Bagge E (1998) Clinical validation of self-reported osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peeters GG, Alshurafa M, Schaap L, de Vet HCW (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of self-reported arthritis in the general adult population is acceptable. J Clin Epidemiol 68(4):452–459 (Elsevier Inc.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. United Sates Department of Health and Human Services (2005) Center for disease control and prevention. National health and nutrition examination survey anthropometry and physical activity monitor (Internet). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_05_06/BM.pdf. Cited 21 Dec 2015

  23. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(1):181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. SAS Programs for Analyzing NHANES 2003–2004 accelerometer data (Internet). http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/nhanes_pam/. Cited 29 May 2015

  25. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2008) Physical activity guidelines for Americans (Internet). Department of Health and Human Services USA, Washington http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/. Cited 21 Dec 2015

  26. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ et al (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(9 Suppl):S498–S504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. NHANES 2003–2004: physical activity—individual activities data documentation, codebook, and frequencies (Internet). http://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2003-2004/PAQIAF_C.htm#Appendix_1._Physical_Activity_Codes. Cited 19 Dec 2015

  28. Sisson SB, Camhi SM, Church TS, Martin CK, Tudor-Locke C, Bouchard C et al (2009) Leisure time sedentary behavior, occupational/domestic physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in U.S. men and women. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 7(6):529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shih M, Hootman JM, Kruger J, Helmick CG (2006) Physical activity in men and women with arthritis National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Am J Prev Med 30:385–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA et al (2014) 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. Circulation 129(25 Suppl 2):S102–S138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katano S, Nakamura Y, Nakamura A, Murakami Y, Tanaka T, Nakagawa H et al (2010) Relationship among physical activity, smoking, drinking and clustering of the metabolic syndrome diagnostic components. J Atheroscler Thromb 17:644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) (Internet). http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/moderate-binge-drinking. Cited 28 Sep 2015

  33. Lee J, Song J, Hootman JM, Semanik PA, Chang RW, Sharma L et al (2013) Obesity and other modifiable factors for physical inactivity measured by accelerometer in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. United Sates Department of Health and Human Services, Center for disease control and prevention. National health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES)—continuous NHANES web tutorial—specifying weighting parameters (Internet). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/nhanes/SurveyDesign/Weighting/intro.htm. Cited 21 Dec 2015

  35. Tooze JA, Troiano RP, Carroll RJ, Moshfegh AJ, Freedman LS (2013) A measurement error model for physical activity level as measured by a questionnaire with application to the 1999–2006 NHANES questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 177(11):1199–1208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. van Weering MGH, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Hermens HJ (2011) The relationship between objectively and subjectively measured activity levels in people with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil 25(3):256–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health O of DP and HP. Advisory Committee Report—G5. Musculoskeletal Health [Internet]. http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/G5_musculo.aspx#_Toc199945420. Cited 21 Dec 2015

  38. Juhl C, Christensen R, Roos EM, Zhang W, Lund H (2014) Impact of exercise type and dose on pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ) 66:622–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cust AE, Smith BJ, Chau J, van der Ploeg HP, Friedenreich CM, Armstrong BK et al (2008) Validity and repeatability of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire: a validation study using accelerometers as an objective measure. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee PH, Yu YY, McDowell I, Leung GM, Lam TH, Stewart SM (2011) Performance of the international physical activity questionnaire (short form) in subgroups of the Hong Kong chinese population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8:81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Crouter SE, DellaValle DM, Haas JD, Frongillo EA, Bassett DR (2013) Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity. J Phys Act Health 10(4):504–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. United States Department Labor. Bureau of labor statistics. Sports and exercise: BLS spotlight on statistics (Internet). http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2008/sports/. Cited 21 Dec 2015

  43. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U et al (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380(9838):247–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wallis JA, Webster KE, Levinger P, Taylor NF (2013) What proportion of people with hip and knee osteoarthritis meet physical activity guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21(11):1648–1659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The OAI is a public–private partnership comprised of five contracts (N01-AR-2-2258; N01-AR-2-2259; N01-AR-2-2260; N01-AR-2-2261; N01-AR-2-2262) funded by the National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services, and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators. Private funding partners include Merck Research Laboratories; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline; and Pfizer, Inc. Private sector funding for the OAI is managed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. This manuscript was prepared using an OAI public use data set and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the OAI investigators, the NIH, or the private funding partners. This study was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease (Project Number 268201000020C-1-0-1 entitled TAS::75 0888::TAS to Charles Eaton).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-Hsien Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no competing interests directly related to this study. Dr. Driban served as a paid consultant to Axsome Therapeutics Inc. on work unrelated to this study. Dr. McAlindon served as a paid consultant to Sanofi Aventis, Samumed, Flexion, Fidia, Regeneron, Plexxikon Inc., Federal Trade Commission, Orthogen, AbbVie, and Pfizer: Joint Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee on work unrelated to this research. All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, SH., Eaton, C.B., Driban, J.B. et al. Comparison of self-report and objective measures of physical activity in US adults with osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 36, 1355–1364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3537-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3537-9

Keywords

Navigation