Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Culture-sensitive adaptation and validation of the Community-Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases methodology for rheumatic disease in Latin American indigenous populations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to validate a culturally sensitive adaptation of the community-oriented program for the control of rheumatic diseases (COPCORD) methodology in several Latin American indigenous populations. The COPCORD Spanish questionnaire was translated and back-translated into seven indigenous languages: Warao, Kariña and Chaima (Venezuela), Mixteco, Maya-Yucateco and Raramuri (Mexico) and Qom (Argentina). The questionnaire was administered to almost 100 subjects in each community with the assistance of bilingual translators. Individuals with pain, stiffness or swelling in any part of the body in the previous 7 days and/or at any point in life were evaluated by physicians to confirm a diagnosis according to criteria for rheumatic diseases. Overall, individuals did not understand the use of a 0–10 visual analog scale for pain intensity and severity grading and preferred a Likert scale comprising four items for pain intensity (no pain, minimal pain, strong pain, and intense pain). They were unable to discriminate between pain intensity and pain severity, so only pain intensity was included. For validation, 702 subjects (286 male, 416 female, mean age 42.7 ± 18.3 years) were interviewed in their own language. In the last 7 days, 198 (28.2 %) subjects reported having musculoskeletal pain, and 90 (45.4 %) of these had intense pain. Compared with the physician-confirmed diagnosis, the COPCORD questionnaire had 73.8 % sensitivity, 72.9 % specificity, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73. The COPCORD questionnaire is a valid screening tool for rheumatic diseases in indigenous Latin American populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO (2003) The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Report of a WHO Scientific Group World Health Organization. Geneva WHO technical report series 919

  2. Pfleger B (2007) Burden and control of musculoskeletal conditions in developing countries: a joint WHO/ILAR/BJD meeting report. Clin Rheumatol 26:1217–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chopra A, Abdel-Nasser A (2008) Epidemiology of rheumatic MSK disorders in the developing world. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22:583–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reyes Llerena GA, Guibert Toledano M, Hernández Martínez AA et al (2000) Prevalence of MSK complaints and disability in Cuba. A community-based study using the COPCORD core questionnaire. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:739–742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reyes-Llerena GA, Guibert-Toledano M, Penedo-Coello A et al (2009) Community-based study to estimate prevalence and burden of illness of rheumatic diseases in Cuba: a COPCORD study. J Clin Rheumatol 15:51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardiel MH, Rojas-Serrano J (2002) Community based study to estimate prevalence, burden of illness and help seeking in rheumatic diseases in Mexico city. A COPCORD study. Clin Exp Rheum 20:617–624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peláez-Ballestas I, Sanin LH, Moreno-Montoya J et al (2011) Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases in Mexico. A study of 5 regions based on the COPCORD methodology. J Rheumatol Suppl 86:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodríguez-Senna E, De Barros LP, Silva EO et al (2004) Prevalence of rheumatic diseases in Brazil: a study using the COPCORD approach. J Rheumatol 31:594–597

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gamboa R, Medina M, Acevedo E et al (2009) Prevalence of rheumatic diseases and disability in an urban marginal Latin American population. A community based study using the COPCORD model. Rev Peru Reumatol 15:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Obregon-Ponce A, Iraheta I, Garcıa-Ferrer H et al (2012) Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Diseases in Guatemala, Central America. The COPCORD Study of 2 Population. J Clin Rheumatol 18:170–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minaur N, Sawyer S, Parker J, Darmawan J (2004) Rheumatic disease in an Australian Aboriginal community in North Queensland, Australia. A WHO-ILAR COPCORD Survey. J Rheum 31:965–972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vindigni D, Parkinson L, Rivett D, et al (2006) Developing a muscle-skeletal screening survey for indigenous Australians living in rural communities. Rural Remote Health 6:321 (online). http://www.rrh.org.au. Accessed 13 Mar 2013

  13. Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N (2008) Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health 3:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chopra A, Saluja M, Patil J, Tandale HS (2002) Pain and disability, perceptions and beliefs of a rural indian population: A WHO-ILAR COPCORD Study. J Rheum 29:614–621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno-Montoya J, Álvarez-Nemegyei J, Pérez-Barbosa L, et al (2012) Factores individuales y a nivel ecológico asociados con la prevalencia de artritis reumatoide en cinco estados de la República Mexicana. Un análisis multinivel. J Clin Rheumatol 18 Suppl S1

  17. Herráez DL, Martínez-Bueno M, Riba L et al (2013) Rheumatoid arthritis in Latin Americans enriched for Amerindian ancestry is associated with loci in chromosomes 1, 12, and 13, and the HLA class II region. Arthritis Rheum 65:1457–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Massardo L, Pons-Estel BA, Wojdyla D et al (2012) Early rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America: low socioeconomic status related to high disease activity at baseline. Arthritis Care Res 64:1135–1143

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reichenheim M, Moraes C (2007) Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemiological measurement instruments. Rev Saúde Pública 41:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goycochea-Robles MV, Sanin LH, Moreno-Montoya J et al (2011) Validity of the COPCORD core questionnaire as a classification tool for rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol Suppl 86:31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinman A, Benson P (2006) Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med 3:e294–e304

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Winkelman M (2005) Cultural awareness, sensitivity and competence. Eddi Bower Publication, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Valdata M (2010) La comunidad Toba de Rosario frente a la omnipresencia del discurso colonial. ISBN:987-95463-9-3

  24. National Institute of Statistics and Geography—INEGI: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2009) In: Spanish. Percentage of persons with health insurance by municipality

  25. Biord-Castillo H, Wilbert W, Ayala C (2008) Salud Indigena en Venezuela. Volumen II. Edición German Freire, Caracas

  26. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MRJ et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 33:1601–1610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 33:160–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 40:1725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF (1977) Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 20:895–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. The ICD-10 international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: 10th revision, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2004

  35. Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, UK

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sijtsma K (2009) On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika 74:107–120

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves. Crit Care 8:508–512

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bennett K, Cardiel MH, Ferraz MB et al (1997) Community screening for rheumatic disorder: cross cultural adaptation and screening characteristics of the COPCORD Core Questionnaire in Brazil, Chile, and México. The PANLAR-COPCORD working group. J Rheumatol 24:160–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E et al (2006) EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 65:1301–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Awadhi A, Olusi S, Moussa M et al (2002) Validation of the Arabic version of the WHO-ILARCOPCORD Core Questionnaire for community screening of rheumatic diseases in Kuwaitis. J Rheum 29:1754–1759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Veerapen K, Wigley RD, Valkenburg H (2007) Musculoskeletal pain in Malaysia: a COPCORD survey. J Rheum 34:207–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Minh Hoa TT, Damarwan J, Le Shun C et al (2003) Prevalence of the rheumatic diseases in Urban Vietnam: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheum 30:2252–2256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Venezuela: We thank Gean Carlos Martinez (indigenous teacher), Dr. Celenia Rosillo, “Barrio adentro” Health program and Dr. Libya Cabello, Regional Director of Health, State of Monagas, Venezuela, for their technical support in the fieldwork. Argentina: Special thanks to Dr. Miguel Angel Cappiello, Ministry of Heath of the Santa Fé Province, Argentina, for his continuous support for the project. We would also like to thank Dr. Lelio Mangiaterra, statistician Alicia Aronna, and other authorities of the Public Health Secretary of the Municipality of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Dr. Marcela Nuccitelli and Dr. Gustavo Englander, Coordinators of “Nodo Rosario”; Dr. Esteban Ferrandini, Ignacio Gomez, Emilce Beletti and Eduardo Martinez, coordinators of Health District, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Professor Raul Britos, Dr. Guillermo Marconi, Ricardo Fernandez and Hugo Gordillo, Provincial Directorate of Original (native) Peoples and Equity and Ministry of Social Development of Santa Fe Province, Argentina; the team of the Primary Health Care Centers: Juana Azurduy and Juan B. Justo, Municipality of Rosario, and Caritas Guadalupe, Toba Nº 47 and Paulo VI, Santa Fe Province; Dr. Carlos Crisci and Dr. Damian Vercenazi, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Cecilia Aguado, Israel Albertario, Verónica Cattaneo, Luciano Heredia, medical students, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Dr. Julieta Milanesio and Dr. Mariano Palatnik, Hospital Provincial del Centenario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Dr. Guillermo A. Berbotto, Hospital Eva Perón, Granadero Baigorria, Santa Fe, Argentina; the Qom Community Center: QADHUOQTÉ, Barrio Los Pumitas, Rosario, Santa Fé, Argentina, and its president Ernesto Oscar Talero; the translators and cultural facilitators: Ana Maria Jerez, Ana Medina, Ezequiel Alvarez, Gertrudis Lazaro, Mirian Alonso, Hector Lopez and Ronaldo Sanchez; the data entry assistants: Antonella Vanucci, Leonardo Grasso and Jorge Melchiori; Maria Cecilia Caffaratti, anthropologist and Vanina García Bianco, psychologist. Mexico: We thank Diego Yeh Cen (Community facilitator of Chakom, Yucatán), Maria Lizbeth Escudero, Veronica Hernandez (Health Research assistant, Mexico City) and Mexican College of Rheumatology, Mexico. Ministry of Health of Santa Fe Province, Argentina (by resolution 0127/08 Feb, 2011) and Public Health Secretary, Municipality of Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. This study was supported by the National Council for Science and Technology and Ministry of Health (Health CONACYT-2007-C01-162154) (Mexico).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo A. Pons-Estel.

Additional information

Ingris Pelaez-Ballestas and Bernardo Pons-Estel equally contributed to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peláez-Ballestas, I., Granados, Y., Silvestre, A. et al. Culture-sensitive adaptation and validation of the Community-Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases methodology for rheumatic disease in Latin American indigenous populations. Rheumatol Int 34, 1299–1309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2997-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2997-z

Keywords

Navigation