Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) in an Iranian population. In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled 168 FM patients and 110 controls. All participants underwent dolorimetry examination by study assessors and completed a questionnaire containing variables of both the ACR 2010 preliminary and ACR 1990 criteria. We compared the performance of the ACR 2010 criteria with the expert diagnosis as well as the ACR 1990 criteria. Receiver operator characteristic analyses and Youden index were used to evaluate the test characteristics of a set of different cutoff points for two subcomponents of ACR 2010 criteria including widespread pain index (WPI) and symptom severity (SS) scale. Considering expert diagnosis as the gold standard, the ACR 2010 criteria showed comparable specificity with ACR 1990 (92.8 vs. 88.3 %, P = 0.073), but lower sensitivity (58.9 vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.003) and a tendency for lower accuracy (72.4 vs. 78.4 %, P = 0.105). Applying the ACR 1990 criteria as the gold standard, we observed a trend toward an increase in overall accuracy (72.4 vs. 79.1 %, P = 0.064). Optimal test characteristics were achieved for WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 and improved sensitivity and accuracy of ACR 2010 criteria when compared to expert, 76.1 and 81.7, respectively. The preliminary ACR 2010 criteria performed less desirably in terms of sensitivity in our set of Iranian patients. Selecting lower cutoff points as WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 improved the diagnostic values of the criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crofford LJ (2011) Fibromyalgia. In: Longo DL, Fauci A, Kasper D, Hauser S, Jameson J, Loscalzo J (eds) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edn. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfe F (1997) The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic. Ann Rheum Dis 56(4):268–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perrot S, Dickenson AH, Bennett RM (2008) Fibromyalgia: harmonizing science with clinical practice considerations. Pain Pract 8(3):177–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett RM (1999) Emerging concepts in the neurobiology of chronic pain: evidence of abnormal sensory processing in fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc 74(4):385–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yunus MB (1992) Towards a model of pathophysiology of fibromyalgia: aberrant central pain mechanisms with peripheral modulation. J Rheumatol 19(6):846–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Granges G, Littlejohn G (1993) Pressure pain threshold in pain-free subjects, in patients with chronic regional pain syndromes, and in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 36(5):642–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett RM, Clark SR, Campbell SM, Burckhardt CS (1992) Low levels of somatomedin C in patients with the fibromyalgia syndrome. A possible link between sleep and muscle pain. Arthritis Rheum 35(10):1113–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA (2009) Should rheumatologists retain ownership of fibromyalgia? J Rheumatol 36(4):667–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzcharles MA (1999) Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The approving rheumatologist’s evidence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 13(3):437–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldenberg DL (1987) Fibromyalgia syndrome. An emerging but controversial condition. JAMA 257(20):2782–2787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldenberg DL (1999) Fibromyalgia syndrome a decade later: what have we learned? Arch Intern Med 159(8):777–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smythe HA, Moldofsky H (1977) Two contributions to understanding of the “fibrositis” syndrome. Bull Rheum Dis 28(1):928–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 33(2):160–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P et al (2010) The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthr Care Res (Hoboken) 62(5):600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzcharles MA, Boulos P (2003) Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: analysis of referrals. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42(2):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buskila D, Neumann L, Sibirski D, Shvartzman P (1997) Awareness of diagnostic and clinical features of fibromyalgia among family physicians. Fam Pract 14(3):238–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mease P, Arnold LM, Bennett R, Boonen A, Buskila D, Carville S et al (2007) Fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 34(6):1415–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yunus MB (2007) Role of central sensitization in symptoms beyond muscle pain, and the evaluation of a patient with widespread pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(3):481–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yunus MB (2007) Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum 36(6):339–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bidari A, Ghavidel-Parsa B, Ghalehbaghi B (2009) Reliability of ACR criteria over time to differentiate classic fibromyalgia from nonspecific widespread pain syndrome: a 6-month prospective cohort study. Mod Rheumatol 19:663–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Hauser W, Katz RS et al (2011) Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 38(6):1113–1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM (1991) The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 18(5):728–733

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Usui C, Hatta K, Aratani S, Yagishita N, Nishioka K, Kanazawa T et al (2012) The Japanese version of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and the fibromyalgia symptom scale: reliability and validity. Mod Rheumatol 22(1):40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzcharles MA, Ste-Marie PA, Panopalis P, Menard H, Shir Y, Wolfe F (2012) The 2010 American College of Rheumatology fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria and symptom severity scale is a valid and reliable tool in a French speaking fibromyalgia cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the medical student Alireza Amir-moafi for his kind help in data gathering from two referral centers of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Bidari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bidari, A., Hassanzadeh, M., Ghavidel Parsa, B. et al. Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population. Rheumatol Int 33, 2999–3007 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2829-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2829-6

Keywords

Navigation