Rheumatology International

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 1143–1147 | Cite as

Ulnar nerve measurements in healthy individuals to obtain reference values

  • Elif YalcinEmail author
  • Burcu Onder
  • Mufit Akyuz
Original Article


The aim of this study was to obtain the ultrasonographical reference values of ulnar nerve cross-sectional areas at the common areas of nerve entrapment as well as any differences related to age, sex, weight, height, dominant arm. Cross-sectional areas of the ulnar nerves of 72 healthy volunteers were measured bilaterally at the level of the epicondyle, 2 cm proximal to and 2 cm distal to the epicondyle, just at the entrance of cubital tunnel, at arterial split, at Guyon’s canal. Age, sex, body weight, height, body mass index, and dominant extremity were recorded. The mean ulnar nerve cross-sectional area was 5.8 ± 1.1 mm2 at 2 cm proximal to medial epicondyle, 6.2 ± 1.1 mm2 at the medial epicondyle, 5.6 ± 0.9 mm2 at the entrance of the cubital tunnel, 5.6 ± 1.0 mm2 at 2 cm distal to medial epicondyle (inside the flexor carpi ulnaris), 5.0 ± 0.6 mm2 at arterial split, and 4.9 ± 0.6 mm2 at Guyon’s canal. There was statistically no difference between the dominant and nondominant sides (p > 0.05). Females had statistically smaller nerves than males (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation with height at all levels; also, weight was significantly correlated with cross-sectional areas except at two levels: tip of medial epicondyle and 2 cm distal. This study provides normative data of ulnar nerve ultrasonography and as well as any differences related to age, sex, height, weight, and dominant arm.


Ulnar nerve Reference Ultrasound 


  1. 1.
    Walker FO, Cartwright MS, Wiesler ER, Caress J (2004) Ultrasound of nerve and muscle. Clin Neurophysiol 115:495–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kara M, Tiftik T, Yetişgin A, Ural G, Ozçakar L (2012) Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of posterior interosseous nerve entrapment: a case report. Muscle Nerve 45(2):299–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kara M, Erkin G, Malas FU, Kaymak B, Uysal H, Ozçakar L (2010) Carpal tunnel syndrome in two cases of all ulnar hand: a word for nerve’s ultrasound. Acta Reumatol Port 35(3):403–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Cheng SP, Hsu CC, Chan RC, Tiu CM et al (1998) Cubital tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by high-resolution ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 17:643–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO (2006) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. Hand Surg 31:1088–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beekman R, Schoemaker MC, Van Der Plas JP, Van Den Berg LH (2004) FranssenH, Wokke JH, et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology 62:767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS (2010) Ulnar neuropathy with normal electrodiagnosis and abnormal nerve ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(2):318–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norbury WJ, Cartwright MS, Walker OF, Gutierrez C, Moore DP, Mandel S (2011) Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Entrapment Neuropathies in the Upper Limb. Practical NeurologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacob D, Creteur V, Courthaliac C (2004) Sonoanatomy of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel: a multicentre study by the GEL. Eur Radiol 14:1770–1773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bayrak AO, Bayrak IK, Turker H, Elmali M, Nural MS (2010) Ultrasonography in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of cross-sectional area and swelling ratio with electrophysiological severity. Muscle Nerve 41(5):661–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Passmore LV, Walker FO (2007) Ultrasonographic findings of the normal ulnar nerve in adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(3):394–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zaidman CM, Al-lozi M, Pestronk A Peripheral nerve size in normals and patients with polyneuropathy: an ultrasound studyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peeters EY, Nieboer KH, Osteaux MM (2004) Sonography of the normal ulnar nerve at Guyon’s canal and of the common peroneal nerve dorsal to the fibular head. J Clin Ultrasound 32:375–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Werner RA, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA (2004) Influence of body mass index on median nerve function, carpal canal pressure, and cross sectional area of the median nerve. Muscle Nerve 30:481–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Won JS, Yoon SJ, Kim YJ, Kim YJ, Kim JS, Jeong SJ (2011) Avoiding false negative nerve conduction study in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 44(4):583–586. doi: 10.1002/mus.22131 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akyuz M, Yalcin E, Selcuk B, Onder B, Ozçakar L (2011) Electromyography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of a rare double-crush ulnar nerve injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92(11):1914–1916 (Epub 2011 Aug 12)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cutts S (2007) Cubital tunnel. Postgrad Med J 83:28–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Volpe A, Rossato G, Bottanelli M, Marchetta A, Caramaschi P, Bambara LM, Bianconi C, Arcaro G, Grassi W (2009) Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: correlation with electrophysiological studies. Rheumatology 48(9):1098–1101 (Epub 2009 Jun 30)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations