Abstract
The aim was to evaluate the relative importance of the 20 functions assessed by patients to produce the Health Assessment Questionnaire’s Disability Index (HAQ-DI). A systematic sample of 242 rheumatoid arthritis patients was drawn. Altogether 179 subjects returned acceptably filled questionnaire including perceived rheumatoid arthritis status in the 20 functions comprising the HAQ-DI. A separate complementary questionnaire was sent to 80 randomly chosen subjects. They were asked to estimate how important each of the same 20 items were in their everyday life using the VAS method. Completely answered complementary questionnaires were returned by 66 (88%) of the subsample. The relative importance of the functions assessed varied considerably. Men assessed the highest importance to the ability to walk outdoors on flat ground and women to dressing themselves, getting in and out of bed and washing and drying their body. For both genders the least important function was the ability to take a tub bath. The importance of all other functions except taking a tub bath was positively highly significantly correlated with the importance of each of the other functions. Factor analyses with one factor model showed high loadings on most functions, with the exception of ‘Take a tub bath’. The two-factor model formed one factor with loadings concentrating slightly more on ‘lower extremity’ and another on ‘upper extremity’. Assessment of RA patients’ functional status would benefit from further development of measures by giving relative weights from patients’ perspective to those functional abilities which are used for index computations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pinals R, Masi A, Larsen R (1981) Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 24:1308–1315
Huskisson E (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131
Smedstad L, Kvien T, Moum T, Vaglum P (1997) Correlates of patients’ global assessment of arthritis impact. A 2-year study of 216 patients with RA. Scand J Rheumatol 26:259–265
van der Heijde D, van’t Hof M, van Riel P, Theunisse L, Lubberts E, van Leeuwen M, van Rijswijk M, van de Putte L (1990) Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 49:916–920
van der Heijde D, van’t Hof M, van Riel P, van de Putte L (1993) Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 20:579–581
Prevoo M, van Riel P, van’t Hof M, van Rijswijk M, van Leeuwen M, Kuper H, van de Putte L (1995) Validity and reliability of joint indices. A longitudinal study in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 32:589–594
Fries J, Spitz P, Kraines G, Holman H (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–145
Bruce B, Fries J (2005) The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:14–18
Pincus T, Summey J, Soraci S Jr, Wallston K, Hummon N (1983) Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 26:1346–1353
Wolfe F (2001) Which HAQ is best? A comparison of the HAQ, MHAQ and RA-HAQ, a difficult 8 item HAQ (DHAQ), and a rescored 20 item HAQ (HAQ20): analyses in 2491 rheumatoid arthritis patients following Leflunomide initiation. J Rheumatol 28:982–989
Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Grace E, Hanna B (1987) The MACTAR patient preference functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 14:446–451
Hewlett S, Smith A, Kirwan J (2001) Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public. Ann Rheum Dis 60:928–933
Carr A, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Mitchell H, Ryan S, Carr M, Kirwan J (2003) Rheumatology outcomes: the patient’s perspective. J Rheumatol 30:880–883
Verhoeven A, Boers M, van der Linden S (2000) Validity of the MACTAR questionnaire as a functional index in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial. J Rheumatol 27:2801–2809
Tuominen R, Tuominen S, Suominen C, Möttönen T, Azbel M, Hemmilä J (2009) Perceived functional disabilities among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1043-z
Kvien T, Heiberg T (2003) Patient perspective in outcome assesments—perceptions or something else. J Rheumatol 30:873–876
Salaffi F, Bazzichi L, Stancati A, Neri R, Cazzato M, Consensi A, Grassi W, Bombardieri S (2005) Development of a functional disability measurement tool to assess early arthritis: the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (Road) questionnaire. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:628–636
Pincus T, Sokka T, Kautiainen H (2005) Further development of a physical function scale on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire for standard care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 32:1432–1439
Mason J, Anderson J, Meenan R, Haralson K, Lewis-Steavens D, Kaine J (1992) The rapid assessment of disease activity in rheumatology (radar) questionnaire. Validity and sensitivity to change of a patient self-reported measure of joint count and clinical status. Arthritis Rheum 35:156–162
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Neri R, Grassi W, Bombardieri S (2005) Measuring functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) index. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(Suppl. 39):S31–S42
Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Kvien T, Ahlmen M et al (2003) Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 30:868–872
Acknowledgments
This study has been supported by grants from the research funds of The Hospital District of Southwest Finland and from Wyeth AB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuominen, R., Möttönen, T., Suominen, C. et al. Relative importance of the functional abilities comprising Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int 30, 1477–1482 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1176-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1176-0