The impact of concomitant depression on quality of life and health service utilisation in patients with osteoarthritis
- 206 Downloads
To assess the impact of concomitant depression on quality of life (QoL) and health service utilisation of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Data were collected from 75 primary care practices in Germany. Totally, 1,250 patients were consecutively approached; 1,021 (81.7%) questionnaires were returned and analysed. Measures included sociodemographic data, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS2-SF) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess depression. A PHQ-9 score ≥ 15 was defined as reflecting depression. Patients with a depressive disorder achieved significantly (all P < 0.001) higher scores in all AIMS2-SF dimensions. They had more contacts to general practitioners (P < 0.01), orthopaedics (P < 0.01) and to providers of Complementary Alternative Medicine offered e.g. by healers. Concomitant depression aggravates the burden of OA significantly. This results in increased health service utilisation. Appropriate treatment of depression would appear not only to increase QoL but also to lower costs by decreasing health service utilisation.
KeywordsDepression Osteoarthritis Quality of life Health service utilisation Primary care
- 1.Roseman T, Backenstrass M, Rosemann A, et al. (2006) Predictors of depression in a sample of 1021 primary care patients with Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (in press)Google Scholar
- 9.Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 28.Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, et al. (2003) Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (416):27–36Google Scholar