Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive value of grip strength for bone mineral density in males: site specific or systemic?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of grip strength on bone mineral density (BMD) of different sites in males. Two hundred thirty-four male patients were included in the study. BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck, proximal radius-ulna (PRU) and distal radius-ulna (DRU) sites were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and grip strength by using a hand dynamometer. Grip strength and BMD values of PRU and DRU at forearms were significantly higher on the dominant sides (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). Stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that only the grip strength of the same side was the best predictor of the BMD of the dominant and non-dominant PRU with a ratio of 8.5 and 10.2%, respectively, whereas grip strength of the same side, age and weight were the best predictors of the BMD of the dominant and non-dominant DRU with a ratio of 25 and 24.6%, respectively. There was no predictive value of grip strength for BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck. In conclusion, grip strength appears to be predictive of site specific rather than systemic BMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valdimarsson O, Kristinsson JO, Stefansson SO, Valdimarsson S, Sigurdsson G (1999) Lean mass and physical activity as predictors of bone mineral density in 16–20-year old women. J Intern Med 245:489–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmermann CL, Smidt GL, Brooks JS, Kinsey WJ, Ekhoff TL (1990) Relationship of extremity muscle torque and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Phys Ther 70:302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kemmler W, Engelke K, Weineck J, Hensen J, Kalender WA (2003) The Erlangen fitness osteoporosis prevention study: a controlled exercise trial in early postmenopausal women with low bone density-first-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:673–682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan CS, Blimkie CJ, Cowell CT, Burke ST, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R (2002) Bone mineral density in adolescent female athletes: relationship to exercise type and muscle strength. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:286–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimston SK, Willows ND, Hanley DA (1993) Mechanical loading regime and its relationship to bone mineral density in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:1203–1210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taaffe DR, Marcus R (2004) The muscle strength and bone density relationship in young women: dependence on exercise status. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 44:98–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan SL, Saag KG, Julian BA, Blair H (2001) Osteopenic bone diseases. In: Koopman WJ, Moreland LW (eds) Arthritis and allied conditions: a textbook of rheumatology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2449–2513

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slemenda CW, Miller JZ, Hui SL, Reister TK, Johnston CC Jr (1991) Role of physical activity in the development of skeletal mass in children. J Bone Miner Res 6:1227–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinaki M, Canvin JC, Phillips BE, Clarke BL (2004) Site specificity of regular health club exercise on muscle strength, fitness, and bone density in women aged 29 to 45 years. Mayo Clin Proc 79:639–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozdurak RH, Duz S, Arsal G, Akinci Y, Kablan N, Isikli S, Korkusuz F (2003) Quantitative forearm muscle strength influences radial bone mineral density in osteoporotic and healthy males. Technol Health Care 11:253–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goslings WR, Cole TJ, Prentice A, Bishop NJ (1995) Rate of radial bone mineral accretion in healthy children. Acta Paediatr 84:383–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyllonen ES, Vaananen HK, Heikkinen JE, Kurttila-Matero E, Martikkala V, Vanharanta JH (1991) Comparison of muscle strength and bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women. A cross-sectional population study. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:153–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinaki M, McPhee MC, Hodgson SF, Merritt JM, Offord KP (1986) Relationship between bone mineral density of spine and strength of back extensors in healthy postmenopausal women. Mayo Clin Proc 61:116–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen OR, Schaadt O, Bliddal H, Egsmose C, Sylvest J (1993) Relationship between quadriceps strength and bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and distal forearm in women. J Bone Miner Res 8:1439–1444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Snow-Harter C, Whalen R, Myburgh K, Arnaud S, Marcus R (1992) Bone mineral density, muscle strength, and recreational exercise in men. J Bone Miner Res 7:1291–1296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribom E, Ljunggren O, Piehl-Aulin K, Ljunghall S, Bratteby LE, Samuelson G, Mallmin H (2004) Muscle strength correlates with total body bone mineral density in young women but not in men. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasegawa Y, Schneider P, Reiners C (2001) Age, sex, and grip strength determine architectural bone parameters assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the human radius. J Biomech 34:497–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Balogun JA, Akomolafe CT, Amusa LO (1991) Grip strength: effects of testing posture and elbow position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 72:280–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaisson CE, Zhang Y, Sharma L, Kannel W (1999) Grip strength and the risk of developing radiographic hand osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum 42:33–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sahin G, Duce MN, Milcan A, Bagis S, Cimen OB, Cimen B, Erdogan C (2002) Bone mineral density and grip strength in postmenopausal Turkish women with osteoporosis: site specific or systemic? Int J Fertil Womens Med 47:236–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Osei-Hyiaman D, Ueji M, Toyokawa S, Takahashi H, Kano K (1999) Influence of grip strength on metacarpal bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women: a cross-sectional study. Calcif Tissue Int 64:263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinaki M, Fitzpatrick LA, Ritchie CK, Montesano A, Wahner HW (1998) Site-specificity of bone mineral density and muscle strength in women: job-related physical activity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 77:470–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Izumotani K, Hagiwara S, Izumotani T, Miki T, Morii H, Nishizawa Y (2003) Risk factors for osteoporosis in men. J Bone Miner Metab 21:86–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Foley KT, Owings TM, Pavol MJ, Grabiner MD (1999) Maximum grip strength is not related to bone mineral density of the proximal femur in older adults. Calcif Tissue Int 64:291–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsuji S, Tsunoda N, Yata H, Katsukawa F, Onishi S, Yamazaki H (1995) Relation between grip strength and radial bone mineral density in young athletes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristinsson JO, Valdimarsson O, Steingrimsdottir L, Sigurdsson G (1994) Relation between calcium intake, grip strength and bone mineral density in the forearms of girls aged 13 and 15. J Intern Med 236:385–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülümser Aydın.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aydın, G., Atalar, E., Keleş, I. et al. Predictive value of grip strength for bone mineral density in males: site specific or systemic?. Rheumatol Int 27, 125–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0178-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0178-4

Keywords

Navigation