Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of different bone markers with bone density in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common concomitant disease in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Bone status is usually evaluated by determination of bone density in combination with clinical examinations and laboratory tests. However, the strength of individual biochemical bone makers in GC-induced osteoporosis has yet to be fully clarified. For this reason, different bone markers were investigated in correlation with bone density in patients with rheumatic diseases. Approximately 238 patients (212 women, 26 men) with a rheumatic disease and under GC therapy were examined consecutively for the first time with regard to bone density (BMD) and bone markers {osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (precipitation method/tandem-MP ostase), crosslinks [pyridinoline (PYD), deoxypyridinoline (DPX), N-terminal telopeptide (NTX)]}. The daily glucocorticoid dose was 10 mg prednisone equivalent (median), and the cumulative dose was 12 g prednisone equivalent (median). None of the patients had previously taken medication for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was demonstrated in 35.3% of the patients, osteopenia in 47.5%, and a normal BMD in 17.2%. The results of tandem-MP ostase correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine and of the femoral neck. The values for N-terminal telopeptide and pyridinoline correlated only with the bone density of the femoral neck. All results were statistically significant, although the correlation coefficients were low. After classification of the patients according to their BMD values (osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal BMD), there were significantly more patients with bone markers above the norm in the osteoporosis group and in the osteopenia group than in the group with normal bone density. All bone markers recorded behaved similarly in relation to the bone density values. The same analysis was also undertaken for the different disease groups. In these subgroups there was also a correlation between ostase/crosslinks with BMD, but the correlation coefficients were low. A general recommendation for the routine use of a specific bone marker in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy cannot be made from a cost-benefit point of view mainly because of limited predictive power (low correlation coefficients, incomplete correlation with different sites of BMD measurement).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patschan D, Loddenkemper K, Buttgereit F (2001) Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Bone 29:498–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1383–1389

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peat ID, Healy S, Reid DM, Ralston SH (1995) Steroid induced osteoporosis: an opportunity for prevention? Ann Rheum Dis 54:66–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delmas PD, Eastell R, Garnero P, Seibel MJ, Stepan J (2000) The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int 11 [Suppl 6]:S2–S17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garnero P, Grimaux M, Seguin P, Delmas PD (1994) Characterization of immunoreactive forms of human osteocalcin generated in vivo and in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 9:255–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garnero P, Delmas PD (1993) Assessment of the serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase with a new immunoradiometric assay in patients with metabolic bone disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1046–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CH, Kellingray S, Wood PJ, Cooper C (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McLaren AM, Hordon LD, Bird HA, Robins SP (1992) Urinary excretion of pyridinium crosslinks of collagen in patients with osteoporosis and the effects of bone fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 51:648–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riis BJ, Hansen MA, Jensen AM, Overgaard K, Christiansen C (1996) Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study. Bone 19:9–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delmas PD (2000) Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 11:189–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical report series 843. Ref type: report

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seibel MJ (2000) Molecular markers of bone turnover: biochemical, technical and analytical aspects. Osteoporos Int 11 [Suppl 6]:S18–S29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapurlat RD, Garnero P, Breart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (2000) Serum type I collagen breakdown product (serum CTX) predicts hip fracture risk in elderly women: the EPIDOS study. Bone 27:283–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manicourt DH, Poilvache P, Van Egeren A, Devogelaer JP, Lenz ME, Thonar EJ (2000) Synovial fluid levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and oncostatin M correlate with levels of markers of the degradation of crosslinked collagen and cartilage aggrecan in rheumatoid arthritis but not in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hart SR, Green B (2002) Osteoporosis prophylaxis during corticosteroid treatment: failure to prescribe. Postgrad Med J 78:242–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstanze Loddenkemper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loddenkemper, K., Bohl, N., Perka, C. et al. Correlation of different bone markers with bone density in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy. Rheumatol Int 26, 331–336 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0608-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0608-8

Keywords

Navigation