Rheumatology International

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 622–626 | Cite as

Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation

  • Bulent Ozturk
  • Osman Hakan GunduzEmail author
  • Kursat Ozoran
  • Sevinc Bostanoglu
Original Article


We investigated the effects of continuous lumbar traction in patients with lumbar disc herniation on clinical findings, and size of the herniated disc measured by computed tomography (CT). In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation were included, and randomized into two groups as the traction group (24 patients), and the control group (22 patients). The traction group was given a physical therapy program and continuous lumbar traction. The control group was given the same physical therapy program without traction, for the same duration of time. Data for the clinical symptoms and signs were collected before and after the treatment together with calculation of a herniation index, from the CT images that showed the size of the herniated disc material. In the traction group, most of the clinical findings significantly improved with treatment. Size of the herniated disc material in CT decreased significantly only in the traction group. In the traction group the herniation index decreased from 276.6±129.6 to 212.5±84.3 with treatment (p<0.01). In the control group, pretreatment value was 293.4±112.1, and it decreased to 285.4±115.4 after the treatment (p>0.05). Patients with greater herniations tended to respond better to traction. In conclusion, lumbar traction is both effective in improving symptoms and clinical findings in patients with lumbar disc herniation and also in decreasing the size of the herniated disc material as measured by CT.


Lumbar disc herniation Conservative treatment Physical therapy Traction Computed tomography 


  1. 1.
    Mathews JA, Mills SB, Jenkins VM, Grimes SM, Morkel MJ, Mathews W, Scott CM, Sittampalam Y (1987) Back pain and sciatica: controlled trials of manipulation, traction, sclerosant and epidural injections. Br J Rheumatol 26:416–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deyo R, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ (1990) Herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Ann Intern Med 112:598–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burton CV (1981) Conservative management of low back pain. Postgrad Med 70:168–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fast A (1988) Low back disorders: conservative management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:880–891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Postacchini F (1996) Spine update. Result of surgery compared with conservative management for lumbar disc herniations. Spine 21:1383–1387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fagerlund MKJ, Thelander U, Friberg S (1990) Size of lumbar disc hernias measured using computed tomography and related to sciatic symptoms. Acta Radiol 31:555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maigne J, Deligne L (1994) Computed tomographic follow-up study of 21 cases of nonoperatively treated cervical intervertebral soft disc herniation. Spine 19:189–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beurskens AJ, Van der Heijden GJ, De Vet HC, Koke AJ, Lindeman E, Regtop W, Knipschild PG (1995) The efficacy of traction for lumbar back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipul Physiol Ther 18:141–147Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Onel D, Tuzlacı M, Sarı H, Demir K (1989) Computed tomographic investigation of the effect of traction on lumbar disc herniations. Spine 14:82–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tesio L, Merlo A (1993) Autotraction versus passive traction: an open controlled study in lumbar disc herniation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:871–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheer SJ, Radack KL, O’Brien DR (1996) Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 2. Discogenic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1189–1197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bush K, Cowan N, Katz DE, Gishen P (1992) The natural history of sciatica associated with disc pathology. A prospective study with clinical and independent radiologic follow-up. Spine 17:1205–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dullerud R, Nakstad PH (1994) CT changes after conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation. Acta Radiol 35:415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reust P, Chantraine A, Vischer TL (1988) Traitement par tractions mécaniques des lombosciatalgies avec ou sans déficit neurologique. Schweiz Med Wschr 118:271–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cailliet R (1982) Disc disease. In: Cailliet R (ed) Low back pain syndrome. Davis Company, Philadelphia, pp144–171Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellenberg MR, Ross ML, Honet JC, Schwartz M, Chodoroff G, Enochs S (1993) Prospective evaluation of the course of disc herniations in patients with proven radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saal JA, Saal JS, Herzog RJ (1990) The natural history of lumbar intervertebral disc extrusions treated nonoperatively. Spine 15:683–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bulent Ozturk
    • 1
  • Osman Hakan Gunduz
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kursat Ozoran
    • 1
  • Sevinc Bostanoglu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Institution of OriginAnkara Numune Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationMarmara University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Radiology, Ankara Numune Education and Research HospitalInstitution of OriginAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations