Abstract
Yeast Apn2 is an AP endonuclease and DNA 3′-diesterase that belongs to the Exo III family with homology to the E. coli exonuclease III, Schizosaccharomyces pombe eth1, and human AP endonucleases APEX1 and APEX2. In the absence of Apn1, the major AP endonuclease in yeast, Apn2 can cleave the DNA backbone at an AP lesion initiating the base excision repair pathway. To study the role and relative contribution of Apn2, we took advantage of a reporter system that was previously used to delineate how uracil-derived AP sites are repaired. At this reporter, disruption of the Apn1-initiated base excision repair pathway led to a significant elevation of A:T to C:G transversions. Here we show that such highly elevated A:T to C:G transversion mutations associated with uracil residues in DNA are abolished when apn1∆ yeast cells are grown in glucose as the primary carbon source. We also show that the disruption of Apn2, either by the complete gene deletion or by the mutation of a catalytic residue, results in a similarly reduced rate of the uracil-associated mutations. Overall, our results indicate that Apn2 activity is regulated by the glucose repression pathway in yeast.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Yeast strains will be made available upon request.
References
Bennett RA (1999) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ETH1 gene, an inducible homolog of exonuclease III that provides resistance to DNA-damaging agents and limits spontaneous mutagenesis. Mol Cell Biol 19:1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.3.1800
Bessman MJ, Lehman IR, Adler J, Zimmerman SB, Simms ES, Kornberg A (1958) Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. Iii. The incorporation of pyrimidine and purine analogues into deoxyribonucleic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44:633–640
Boiteux S, Jinks-Robertson S (2013) DNA repair mechanisms and the bypass of DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 193:1025–1064. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.145219
Busso CS, Iwakuma T, Izumi T (2009) Ubiquitination of mammalian AP endonuclease (APE1) regulated by the p53-MDM2 signaling pathway. Oncogene 28:1616–1625. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.5
Busso CS, Lake MW, Izumi T (2010) Posttranslational modification of mammalian AP endonuclease (APE1). Cell Mol Life Sci 67:3609–3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0487-3
Ceroni A, Passerini A, Vullo A, Frasconi P (2006) DISULFIND: a disulfide bonding state and cysteine connectivity prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W177-181. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl266
Chon J, Field MS, Stover PJ (2019) Deoxyuracil in DNA and disease: genomic signal or managed situation? DNA Repair 77:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.014
Cohen BA, Pilpel Y, Mitra RD, Church GM (2002) Discrimination between paralogs using microarray analysis: application to the Yap1p and Yap2p transcriptional networks. Mol Biol Cell 13:1608–1614. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-10-0472
Collura A, Kemp PA, Boiteux S (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9–1–1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 11:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.12.004
Crook NC, Freeman ES, Alper HS (2011) Re-engineering multicloning sites for function and convenience. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e92. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr346
Daley JM, Zakaria C, Ramotar D (2010) The endonuclease IV family of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases. Mutat Res 705:217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.07.003
Guaragnella N et al (2013) Yeast growth in raffinose results in resistance to acetic-acid induced programmed cell death mostly due to the activation of the mitochondrial retrograde pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:2765–2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.07.017
Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH (2002) A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30:e23
Guillet M, Boiteux S (2003) Origin of endogenous DNA abasic sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 23:8386–8394. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.23.22.8386-8394.2003
Guillet M, Van Der Kemp PA, Boiteux S (2006) dUTPase activity is critical to maintain genetic stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 34:2056–2066. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl139
Hagner N, Joerger M (2010) Cancer chemotherapy: targeting folic acid synthesis. Cancer Manag Res 2:293–301. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMR.S10043
Hanna M, Chow BL, Morey NJ, Jinks-Robertson S, Doetsch PW, Xiao W (2004) Involvement of two endonuclease III homologs in the base excision repair pathway for the processing of DNA alkylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 3:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.09.005
Johnson RE, Torres-Ramos CA, Izumi T, Mitra S, Prakash S, Prakash L (1998) Identification of APN2, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the major human AP endonuclease HAP1, and its role in the repair of abasic sites. Genes Dev 12:3137–3143. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.19.3137
Kayikci O, Nielsen J (2015) Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov068
Kim N, Jinks-Robertson S (2009) dUTP incorporation into genomic DNA is linked to transcription in yeast. Nature 459:1150–1153. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08033[pii]
Kim N, Jinks-Robertson S (2010) Abasic sites in the transcribed strand of yeast DNA are removed by transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell Biol 30:3206–3215. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00308-10[pii]
Kim N, Abdulovic AL, Gealy R, Lippert MJ, Jinks-Robertson S (2007) Transcription-associated mutagenesis in yeast is directly proportional to the level of gene expression and influenced by the direction of DNA replication. DNA Repair 6:1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.023
Kim N et al (2011a) Mutagenic processing of ribonucleotides in DNA by yeast topoisomerase I. Science 332:1561–1564. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205016
Kim N, Mudrak SV, Jinks-Robertson S (2011b) The dCMP transferase activity of yeast Rev1 is biologically relevant during the bypass of endogenously generated AP sites. DNA Repair 10:1262–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.09.017
Li F et al (2019) Apn2 resolves blocked 3’ ends and suppresses Top1-induced mutagenesis at genomic rNMP sites. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0186-1
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)). Method Methods 25:402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3:330–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1074
Luke AM et al (2010) Accumulation of true single strand breaks and AP sites in base excision repair deficient cells. Mutat Res 694:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.08.008
Martinez-Pastor MT, Marchler G, Schuller C, Marchler-Bauer A, Ruis H, Estruch F (1996) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J 15:2227–2235
Meadows KL, Song B, Doetsch PW (2003) Characterization of AP lyase activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ntg1p and Ntg2p: implications for biological function. Nucleic Acids Res 31:5560–5567. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg749
Owiti N, Lopez C, Singh S, Stephenson A, Kim N (2017) Def1 and Dst1 play distinct roles in repair of AP lesions in highly transcribed genomic regions. DNA Repair 55:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.05.003
Owiti N, Wei S, Bhagwat AS, Kim N (2018) Unscheduled DNA synthesis leads to elevated uracil residues at highly transcribed genomic loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 14:e1007516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007516
Owiti N, Stokdyk K, Kim N (2019) The etiology of uracil residues in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic DNA. Curr Genet 65:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-018-0895-8
Paulo JA, O’Connell JD, Gaun A, Gygi SP (2015) Proteome-wide quantitative multiplexed profiling of protein expression: carbon-source dependency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 26:4063–4074. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-07-0499
Pfeiffer T, Morley A (2014) An evolutionary perspective on the Crabtree effect. Front Mol Biosci 1:17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2014.00017
Popoff SC, Spira AI, Johnson AW, Demple B (1990) Yeast structural gene (APN1) for the major apurinic endonuclease: homology to Escherichia coli endonuclease IV. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4193–4197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.11.4193
Radivojac P et al (2010) Identification, analysis, and prediction of protein ubiquitination sites. Proteins 78:365–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22555
Randez-Gil F, Sanz P, Entian KD, Prieto JA (1998) Carbon source-dependent phosphorylation of hexokinase PII and its role in the glucose-signaling response in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 18:2940–2948. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.5.2940
Ren J et al (2009) Systematic study of protein sumoylation: Development of a site-specific predictor of SUMOsp 2.0. Proteomics 9:3409–3412. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800646
Schmitt AP, McEntee K (1996) Msn2p, a zinc finger DNA-binding protein, is the transcriptional activator of the multistress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5777–5782. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.12.5777
Schuller HJ (2003) Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 43:139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0381-8
Siriwardena SU, Chen K, Bhagwat AS (2016) Functions and malfunctions of mammalian DNA-cytosine deaminases. Chem Rev 116:12688–12710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00296
Spell RM, Jinks-Robertson S (2004) Determination of mitotic recombination rates by fluctuation analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 262:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-761-0:003
Temple MD, Perrone GG, Dawes IW (2005) Complex cellular responses to reactive oxygen species. Trends Cell Biol 15:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.04.003
Teste MA, Duquenne M, Francois JM, Parrou JL (2009) Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Mol Biol 10:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-10-99
Unk I, Haracska L, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L (2000) Apurinic endonuclease activity of yeast Apn2 protein. J Biol Chem 275:22427–22434. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002845200
Venters BJ et al (2011) A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. Mol Cell 41:480–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.015
Wallace SS (2014) Base excision repair: a critical player in many games. DNA Repair 19:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.030
Warner HR, Duncan BK, Garrett C, Neuhard J (1981) Synthesis and metabolism of uracil-containing deoxyribonucleic acid in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 145:687–695
Whelan WL, Gocke E, Manney TR (1979) The CAN1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fine-structure analysis and forward mutation rates. Genetics 91:35–51
Zhang Z, Reese JC (2005) Molecular genetic analysis of the yeast repressor Rfx1/Crt1 reveals a novel two-step regulatory mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 25:7399–7411. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.17.7399-7411.2005
Zhao Q et al (2014) GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W325-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku383
Zhou Z, Elledge SJ (1993) DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 75:1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of Kim lab for discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from National Institutes of Health R01 GM116007 and AU1875 from Welch Foundation to N.K. A.B. was supported by R01 GM116007-S1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
Human/animal rights
This study did not involve any human or animal subjects and followed all ethical standards of research.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Kupiec.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stokdyk, K., Berroyer, A., Grami, Z.A. et al. The activity of yeast Apn2 AP endonuclease at uracil-derived AP sites is dependent on the major carbon source. Curr Genet 67, 283–294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01141-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-020-01141-4