Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Keimzelltumoren des Hodens sind außerordentlich gut heilbar und betreffen meist junge Männer im Alter ≤35 Jahren. Selbst metastasierte Patienten können durch multimodale, Cisplatin-basierte Therapiekonzepte zu ca. 70 % geheilt werden. Patienten, bei denen die Standardtherapie versagt, haben eine sehr ungünstige Prognose, weshalb neue Biomarker und Therapieoptionen dringend benötigt werden.
Ziel der Arbeit
Diskussion histopathologischer Informationen, die für die Entscheidungsfindung der mit der Therapie von Keimzelltumoren befassten Urologen und Onkologen maßgeblich sind.
Material und Methoden
Narrative Übersichtsarbeit zu Schlüsselinformationen männlicher Keimzelltumoren für die klinische Entscheidungsfindung.
Ergebnisse
Zentrale histopathologische Informationen sind insbesondere (i) die Zuordnung eines unklaren Tumorleidens zu einem Keimzelltumorursprung über das Isochromosom 12p, (ii) die klare Benennung der verschiedenen Histologien und (iii) die Beurteilung von Risikofaktoren wie die Lymphangioinvasion oder Rete-testis-Infiltration. Der histopathologische Befund ist maßgeblich für die leitlinienkonforme, risikobasierte Therapieplanung und erfolgreiche -durchführung und hilft die therapeutische Belastung und Langzeitfolgen zu reduzieren. Für refraktäre Keimzelltumoren sind bisher keine prädiktiven oder prognostischen Biomarker oder zielgerichtete Therapien verfügbar.
Diskussion
Eine enge Interaktion und interdisziplinäre Diskussion histopathologischer und radiologischer Befunde sowie etablierter Risikofaktoren wie Serumtumormarker ist entscheidend für den Behandlungserfolg und eine Therapieintensivierung (sofern erforderlich) oder -deeskalation zur Vermeidung einer Übertherapie (sofern möglich).
Abstract
Background
Testicular type II germ cell tumours (GCTs) are an exemplar of a curable cancer and the most common malignancy in males aged ≤35 years. Even in metastatic stages, about 70% of patients can be cured by cisplatin-based chemotherapy and multimodal treatments. For patients failing platinum-based standard therapy, prognosis is poor and novel biomarkers and therapeutic options are urgently needed.
Objectives
Discussion of desired histopathological information to guide urologists’ and oncologists’ decision making in the treatment of male GCTs.
Material and methods
A narrative review of histopathological key features of male GCT tissue samples for clinical decision making.
Results
Histopathological workup is crucial to identify (i) a GCT origin in cancers of unknown primary based on isochromosome 12p (i(12p)) detection, (ii) the different type II GCT subtypes, and (iii) risk factors, i.e. lymphovascular or rete testis invasion, among others. Proper histopathological diagnosis is indispensable for guideline-endorsed, histology-driven, and risk-adapted treatment decisions, hereby helping to maintain treatment success while reducing the therapeutic burden and potential long-term sequelae of multimodal treatments. For refractory patients failing standard treatment options, prognosis remains poor and, so far, neither predictive or prognostic biomarkers nor novel therapeutic targets have been established.
Conclusions
Close interaction and interdisciplinary discussion of histopathologic and radiologic findings and established risk factors including serum tumour markers is crucial for successful treatment including intensified strategies, where necessary, or prevention of overtreatment, where possible.
Literatur
Atkin NB, Baker MC (1983) i(12p): Specific chromosomal marker in seminoma and malignant teratoma of the testis? Cancer Genet Cytogenet 10:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(83)90125-5
AWMF (2020) S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der Keimzelltumoren des Hodens. In: Leitlinienprogr. Onkol. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/LL_Hodentumoren_Langversion_0.1.pdf. Zugegriffen: 3. Aug. 2020
Beyer J, Albers P, Altena R et al (2013) Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer. Ann Oncol 24:878–888
Beyer J, Collette L, Daugaard G et al (2020) Prognostic factors in advanced seminoma: an analysis from the IGCCCG update consortium. J Clin Oncol 38:386–386. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.386
Bokemeyer C, Schleucher N, Metzner B et al (2003) First-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy with autologous transplantation for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours: a prospective trial. Br J Cancer 89:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600999
Brandt MP, Gust KM, Bon D et al (2019) Trend analysis and regional tumor incidence in Germany for testicular cancer between 2003 and 2014. Andrology 7:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12666
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Butcher DN, Gregory WM, Gunter PA et al (1985) The biological and clinical significance of HCG-containing cells in seminoma. Br J Cancer 51:473–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1985.68
Cathomas R, Klingbiel D, Bernard B et al (2018) Questioning the value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for residual lesions after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma: results of an International Global Germ Cell Cancer Group Registry. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00210
Daneshmand S, Albers P, Fosså SD et al (2012) Contemporary management of postchemotherapy testis cancer. Eur Urol 62:867–876
Einhorn LH (2002) Curing metastatic testicular cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4592–4595. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072067999
Fichtner A et al (2020) The detection of isochromosome i(12p) in malignant germ cell tumours and tumours with somatic malignant transformation by the use of quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14258. epub ahead of print
Giannatempo P, Pond GR, Sonpavde G et al (2016) Treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with teratoma with somatic-type malignant transformation: an international collaboration. J Urol 196:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.082
Heidenreich A, Pfister D (2019) Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced germ cell tumors of the testis. In: Urologic oncology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 1–15
Horwich A, Shipley J, Huddart R (2006) Testicular germ-cell cancer. Lancet 367(9512):754–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68305-0
Kalavska K, Schmidtova S, Chovanec M, Mego M (2020) Immunotherapy in testicular germ cell tumors. Front Oncol 10:1910. https://doi.org/10.3389/FONC.2020.573977
Kernek KM, Brunelli M, Ulbright TM et al (2004) Flourescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosome 12p in paraffin-embedded tissue is useful for establishing germ cell origin of metastatic tumors. Mod Pathol 17:1309–1313. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800195
Kesler KA, Rieger KM, Ganjoo KN et al (1999) Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: the influence of postchemotherapy pathology on long-term survival after surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:692–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70015-2
Koch-Institut R (2015) Krebs in Deutschland | 2015/2016
Lafin JT, Bagrodia A, Woldu S, Amatruda JF (2019) New insights into germ cell tumor genomics. Andrology 7:507–515
Lorch A, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2011) Conventional-dose versus high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment in male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors: Evidence from a large international database. J Clin Oncol 29:2178–2184. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.6678
Laguna MP, Albers P, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Boormans JL, Fischer S, Fizazi K, Gremmels H, Leão R, Nicol D, Nicolai N, Oldenburg J (2020) EAU Guideline Testicular Cancer. https://uroweb.org/guideline/testicular-cancer/. Zugegriffen: 1. Okt. 2020
Mead GM (1997) International germ cell consensus classification: a prognostic factor- based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. J Clin Oncol 15:594–603. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.594
Mortensen MS, Lauritsen J, Gundgaard MG et al (2014) A nationwide cohort study of stage i seminoma patients followed on a surveillance program. Eur Urol 66:1172–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.001
Oechsle K, Kollmannsberger C, Honecker F et al (2011) Long-term survival after treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with and without paclitaxel plus secondary surgery in patients with cisplatin-refractory and/or multiply relapsed germ cell tumors. Eur Urol 60:850–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.019
Oing C, Giannatempo P, Honecker F et al (2018) Palliative treatment of germ cell cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 71:102–107
Oing C, Kollmannsberger C, Oechsle K, Bokemeyer C (2016) Investigational targeted therapies for the treatment of testicular germ cell tumors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 25:1033–1043
Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ (2005) Testicular germ-cell tumours in a broader perspective. Nat Rev Cancer 5:210–222
Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ (2019) Human germ cell tumours from a developmental perspective. Nat Rev Cancer 19:522–537
Palumbo C, Mistretta FA, Mazzone E et al (2019) Contemporary incidence and mortality rates in patients with testicular germ cell tumors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 17:e1026–e1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.003
Ravi R, Ong J, Oliver RTD et al (1999) The management of residual masses after chemotherapy in metastatic seminoma. BJU Int 83:649–653. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.1999.00974.x
Read G, Stenning SP, Cullen MH et al (1992) Medical research council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma. J Clin Oncol 10:1762–1768. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.11.1762
Rodney AJ, Tannir NM, Siefker-Radtke AO et al (2012) Survival outcomes for men with mediastinal germ-cell tumors: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 30:879–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.08.005
Rosenberg C, Van Gurp RJHLM, Geelen E et al (2000) Overrepresentation of the short arm of chromosome 12 is related to invasive growth of human testicular seminomas and nonseminomas. Oncogene 19:5858–5862. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203950
Ruf CG, Isbarn H, Wagner W et al (2014) Changes in epidemiologic features of testicular germ cell cancer: age at diagnosis and relative frequency of seminoma are constantly and significantly increasing. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 32:33.e1–33.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.12.002
Schriefer P, Hartmann M, Oechsle K et al (2019) Positron emission tomography in germ cell tumors in men: possibilities and limitations. Urologe 58:418–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-018-0797-x
Seidel C, Daugaard G, Nestler T et al (2020) Human chorionic gonadotropin–positive seminoma patients: a registry compiled by the global germ cell tumor collaborative group (G3). Eur J Cancer 132:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.022
Seidel CA, Daugaard G, Nestler T et al (2020) Prognostic impact of LDH and HCG levels in marker-positive seminomas. J Clin Oncol 38:392–392. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.392
Tandstad T, Ståhl O, Håkansson U et al (2014) One course of adjuvant BEP in clinical stage I nonseminoma mature and expanded results from the SWENOTECA group. Ann Oncol 25:2167–2172. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu375
Taylor-Weiner A, Zack T, O’Donnell E et al (2016) Genomic evolution and chemoresistance in germ-cell tumours. Nature 540:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20596
Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJC et al (2003) Predictors of occult metastasis in clinical stage I nonseminoma: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 21:4092–4099
Yilmaz A, Cheng T, Zhang J, Trpkov K (2013) Testicular hilum and vascular invasion predict advanced clinical stage in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Mod Pathol 26:579–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.189
Förderung
F. Bremmer wird durch die Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung unterstützt (Projektnummer: 2016.041.1 und 2016.041.2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
C. Oing: Reisekostenerstattung: PharmaMar, IPSEN und Medac Pharma. Vortragshonorare von IPSEN und Medac Pharma. Forschungsförderung: Roche, PharmaMar. M.-C. Peters und F. Bremmer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oing, C., Peters, MC. & Bremmer, F. Was der Onkologe vom Pathologen über Hodentumoren wissen muss. Pathologe 41 (Suppl 2), 111–117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-020-00872-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-020-00872-y