Skip to main content
Log in

Prinzipien der Sarkomchirurgie

Principles of sarcoma surgery

  • Schwerpunkt: Sarkome
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Weichgewebesarkome sind seltene Erkrankungen. Unabhängig von der Lokalisation ist die Chirurgie die wichtigste Behandlungsmethode der nicht metastasierten Erkrankung. Fortschritte in der onkologischen und rekonstruktiven Chirurgie haben gemeinsam mit dem Einsatz multimodaler Therapien stark funktionseinschränkende Operationen bei Extremitätensarkomen zu seltenen Eingriffen gemacht. Eine besondere Rolle spielt dabei das Verständnis für eine fokale marginale Resektion im multimodalen Behandlungskonzept. Bei retroperitonealen Sarkomen ist ein Lokalrezidiv lebensbedrohlich und die gezielte Mitresektion angrenzender Organe im Sinne einer Multiviszeralresektion hat sich als Standardoperation durchgesetzt. In diesem Artikel werden neben der chirurgischen Diagnostik und Therapieplanung die Operationsstrategie von Weichgewebesarkomen der Extremitäten und des Retroperitoneums diskutiert.

Abstract

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors. Surgery remains the most important treatment modality. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy may be administered to improve the local and systemic outcome. Advances in oncological and reconstructive surgery, combined with the use of multimodal therapies, have made mutilating surgery rare events in extremity sarcomas. In retroperitoneal sarcomas, local recurrences are life-threatening events and multivisceral resection has become the standard surgical procedure. The subjects of this review are diagnostics, multimodal therapy, and resection strategy from a surgical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Berger-Richardson D, Swallow CJ (2017) Needle tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: Risk/benefit considerations. Cancer 123:560–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blay JY, Soibinet P, Penel N et al (2017) Improved survival using specialized multidisciplinary board in sarcoma patients. Ann Oncol 28:2852–2859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonvalot S, Raut CP, Pollock RE et al (2012) Technical considerations in surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: Position paper from E‑Surge, a master class in sarcoma surgery, and EORTC-STBSG. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2981–2991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S et al (2016) Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: A retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 17:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Bauer S et al (2018) Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29:iv51–iv67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chhabra A, Ashikyan O, Slepicka C et al (2018) Conventional MR and diffusion-weighted imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue malignancy: Correlation with histologic grading. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5845-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De La La Hoz Polo M, Dick E, Bhumbra R et al (2017) Surgical considerations when reporting MRI studies of soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs. Skeletal Radiol 46:1667–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairweather M, Wang J, Jo VY et al (2018) Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: Rationale for selective organ resection. Ann Surg Oncol 25:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grabellus F, Podleska LE, Sheu SY et al (2013) Neoadjuvant treatment improves capsular integrity and the width of the fibrous capsule of high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gronchi A, Ferrari S, Quagliuolo V et al (2017) Histotype-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (ISG-STS 1001): An international, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 18:812–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronchi A, Lo Vullo S, Fiore M et al (2009) Aggressive surgical policies in a retrospectively reviewed single-institution case series of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol 27:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R et al (2016) Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS): A report on 1007 patients from the multi-institutional collaborative RPS working group. Ann Surg 263:1002–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gundle KR, Kafchinski L, Gupta S et al (2018) Analysis of margin classification systems for assessing the risk of local recurrence after soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Clin Oncol 36:704–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haas RL, Delaney TF, O’sullivan B et al (2012) Radiotherapy for management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas: Why, when, and where? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:572–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harati K, Goertz O, Pieper A et al (2017) Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: Surgical margins Can be close as long as the Resected tumor has no ink on it. Oncologist 22:1400–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakob J, Gerres A, Ronellenfitsch U et al (2018) Treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Germany : Results of a survey of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery, the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Study Group and the advocacy group Das Lebenshaus. Chirurg 89:50–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakob J, Hohenberger P (2016) Role of isolated limb perfusion with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha and melphalan in locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 122:2624–2632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kainhofer V, Smolle MA, Szkandera J et al (2016) The width of resection margins influences local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:899–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lansu J, Groenewegen J, Van Coevorden F et al (2019) Time dependent dynamics of wound complications after preoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohr Z, Hirche C, Klein T et al (2012) Vacuum-assisted minimally invasive biopsy of soft-tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R et al (2002) Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: A randomised trial. Lancet 359:2235–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pasquali S, Pizzamiglio S, Touati N et al (2019) The impact of chemotherapy on survival of patients with extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: revisiting the results of the EORTC-STBSG 62931 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 109:51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pencavel TD, Strauss DC, Thomas GP et al (2010) Does the two-week rule pathway improve the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma? A retrospective review of referral patterns and outcomes over five years in a regional sarcoma centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrier L, Buja A, Mastrangelo G et al (2012) Clinicians’ adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: A cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions. BMC Health Serv Res 12:82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pohlig F, Kirchhoff C, Lenze U et al (2012) Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective study. Eur J Med Res 17:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qureshi YA, Huddy JR, Miller JD et al (2012) Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma results in increased rates of local recurrence despite full further oncological treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 19:871–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ressing M, Wardelmann E, Hohenberger P et al (2018) Strengthening health data on a rare and heterogeneous disease: Sarcoma incidence and histological subtypes in Germany. BMC Public Health 18:235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smolle MA, Leithner A, Grimer RJ (2015) Evaluating the British sarcoma referral form. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:434–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ et al (2010) The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. J Surg Oncol 102:523–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Townley WA, Mah E, O’neill AC et al (2013) Reconstruction of sarcoma defects following pre-operative radiation: Free tissue transfer is safe and reliable. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:1575–1579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Traub F, Griffin AM, Wunder JS et al (2018) Influence of unplanned excisions on the outcomes of patients with stage III extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer 124:3868–3875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Houdt WJ, Schrijver AM, Cohen-Hallaleh RB et al (2017) Needle tract seeding following core biopsies in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1740–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS et al (2018) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16:536–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Woll PJ, Reichardt P, Le Cesne A et al (2012) Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and lenograstim for resected soft-tissue sarcoma (EORTC 62931): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:1045–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jakob.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Jakob und P. Hohenberger geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Schwerpunktherausgeber

M. Evert, Regensburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakob, J., Hohenberger, P. Prinzipien der Sarkomchirurgie. Pathologe 40, 431–435 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-019-0631-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-019-0631-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation