Skip to main content
Log in

Mitosen bei frühinvasiven malignen Melanomen

Wie sicher ist die histogenetische Zuordnung im Stadium pT1?

Mitosis in early invasive malignant melanoma

How reliable is histogenetic classification at stage pT1?

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Seit Anfang Februar 2010 wurde am Institut für Pathologie des Krankenhauses der Barmherzigen Schwestern die neue Stadieneinteilung bzw. Klassifikation des American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) von 2009 in den diagnostischen Alltag übernommen. Da der Anzahl der Mitosen/mm2 nach diesen Richtlinien eine zentrale Bedeutung zufällt, konnten wir gemäß dieser Empfehlungen für Melanome im Stadium pT1 eine deutliche Verschiebung vom Stadium pT1a in das Stadium pT1b beobachten. Dies betraf verstärkt jene Tumoren, die sich in der Kategorie pT1a nach der Union-for-International-Cancer-Control(UICC)-Klassifikation (7. Aufl.) minimal-invasiv verhielten. Eine Zuordnung von Mitosen bei frühinvasiven Melanomen in Bezug auf einen möglichen epithelialen oder melanozytären Ursprung ist nicht immer eindeutig. Somit ist nicht auszuschließen, dass Melanome aus dem Stadium pT1a nach UICC aufgrund diagnostischer Unsicherheiten fälschlicherweise ins Stadium pT1b (AJCC) verschoben werden.

Abstract

Since early February 2010 we have been implementing the latest version of the 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification in our institution. Since, according to the guidelines for stage pT1 melanomas, the number of mitoses/mm2 is of particular significance, we have been able to observe a notable shift from pT1a to pT1b. Highlighting the mitotic count as one of the key features of the diagnosis of malignant melanoma, we observed that the major part of stage-switched melanomas belonged to a minimally invasive subset of melanomas previously categorized as pT1a UICC (7th edition). A level of reasonable doubt remains regarding the distinct histogenetic classification of mitosis as early stage melanoma with regard to their epithelial or melanocytic origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Attis MG, Vollmer RT (2007) Mitotic rate in melanoma. A reexamination. Am J Clin Pathol 127:380–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azzola MF, Shaw HM, Thompson JF et al (2003) Tumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. An analysis of 3661 patients from a single center. Cancer 97:1488–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ et al (2001) Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3635–3648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ et al (2009) Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 27:6199–6206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE et al (2001) Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 19:3622–3634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnhill RL, Katzen J, Spatz A et al (2005) The importance of mitotic rate as a prognostic factor for localized cutaneous melanoma. J Cutan Pathol 32:268–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Busam KJ (2004) The prognostic importance of tumor mitotic rate for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 11:360–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark WJr (1967) A classification of malignant melanoma in man correlated with histogenesis and biologic behaviour. In: Montaga W, Hu F (eds) Advances in the biology of the skin. The pigmentary system. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 621–647

  9. Crotty KA, Scolyer RA, Li LXL et al (2002) Spitz naevus versus Spitzoid melanoma: when and how can they be distinguished? J Pathol 34:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucar E, Bentley TJ, Laube DW et al (1985) A histopathologic evaluation of nevocellular nevi in pregnancy. Arch Dermatol 121:350–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Francken AB, Shaw HM, Thompson JF et al (2004) The prognostic importance of tumor mitotic rate confirmed in 1317 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and long follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol 11:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, Balch CM, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (2010) Melanoma Staging Committee. 2010 TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma…and beyond. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1475–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gimotty PA, Elder DE, Fraker DL et al (2007) Identification of high-risk patients among those diagnosed with thin cutaneous melanomas. J Clin Oncol 25:1129–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gimotty PA, Guerry D, Ming ME et al (204) Thin primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic tree for 10-year metastasis is more accurate than American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. J Clin Oncol 22:3668–3676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gimotty PA, Van Belle P, Elder DE et al (2005) Biologic and prognostic significance of dermal Ki67 expression, mitoses, and tumorigenicity in thin invasive cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 23:8048–8056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glatz K, Hartmann C, Antic M, Kutzner H (2010) Frequent mitotic activity in banal melanocytic nevi uncovered by immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Dermatopathol 32(7):643–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen SL, Radfar A, Bhawan J (2007) Mitoses in conventional melanocytic nevi. J Cutan Pathol 34:713–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kesmodel SB, Karakousis GC, Botbyl JD et al (2005) Mitotic rate as a predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with thin melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol 12:449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saad AG, Patel S, Mutasim DF (2005) Melanocytic nevi of the auricular region. Histologic characteristics and diagnostic difficulties. Am J Dermatopathol 27:111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scolyer RA, Shaw HM, Thompson JF et al (2003) Interobserver reproducibility of histopathologic prognostic variables in primary cutaneous melanomas. Am J Surg Pathol 27:1571–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Shaw HM et al (2006) The importance of mitotic rate as a prognostic factor for localized primary cutaneous melanoma. J Cutan Pathol 33:395–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Selim MA, Vollmer RT, Herman CM et al (2007) Melanocytic nevi with nonsurgical trauma: a histopathologic study. Am J Dermatopathol 29:134–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tapia C, Kutzner H, Mentzel T et al (2006) Two mitosis-specific antibodies, MPM-2 and phospho-histone H3 (Ser28), allow rapid and precise determination of mitotic activity. Am J Surg Pathol 30:83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wittekind C, Meyer H-J (2010) TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren/UICC. 7. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Bösmüller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bösmüller, H., Haitchi-Petnehazy, S., Hintringer, T. et al. Mitosen bei frühinvasiven malignen Melanomen. Pathologe 33, 113–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-011-1465-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-011-1465-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation