OR Spectrum

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 703–734 | Cite as

A general test for SSD portfolio efficiency

Regular Article

Abstract

We develop and implement a Linear Programming test to analyze whether a given investment portfolio is efficient in terms of second-order stochastic dominance relative to all possible portfolios formed from a set of base assets. In case of efficiency, the primal model identifies a sub-gradient vector of a utility function that rationalizes the evaluated portfolio. In case of inefficiency, the dual model identifies a second, efficient portfolio that dominates the evaluated portfolio. The test gives a general necessary and sufficient condition, and can deal with general linear portfolio restrictions, inefficiency degree measures, and scenarios with unequal probabilities. We also develop a compact version of the test that substantially reduces computational burden at the cost of losing information about the dual dominating portfolio in case of inefficiency. An application to US investment benchmark data qualifies a broad stock market index as significantly inefficient, and suggests that no risk-averse investor would hold the market index in the face of attractive premiums offered by some more concentrated investment portfolios.

Keywords

Stochastic dominance Portfolio analysis Market portfolio efficiency Linear programming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Czech Science Foundation (Grant P402/12/G097). Financial support by Koç University Graduate School of Business is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abdellaoui M, Barrios C, Wakker PP (2007) Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: experimental arguments based on prospect theory. J Econ 138(1):356–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banz RW (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stock. J Financ Econ 9:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett G, Donald SG (2003) Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71:71–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bawa V, Lindenberg E (1977) Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J Financ Econ 5:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bawa VS, Bodurtha JN Jr, Rao MR, Suri HL (1985) On determination of stochastic dominance optimal sets. J Financ 40:417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2003) Optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 14:548–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2010) Inverse cutting plane methods for optimization problems with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Optimization 59:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dentcheva D, Martinez G (2012) Two-stage stochastic optimization problems with stochastic ordering constraints on the recourse. European J Oper Res 219:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fábián CI, Mitra G, Roman D (2011) Processing second order stochastic dominance models using cutting plane representations. Math Program 130:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons MR, Ross SA, Shanken J (1989) A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica 57:1121–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1934) Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Harlow V, Rao R (1989) Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence. J Financ Quant Anal 24(3):285–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogan W, Warren J (1974) Toward the development of an equilibrium capital-market model based on semi-variance. J Financ Quant Anal 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kopa M, Chovanec P (2008) A second-order stochastic dominance portfolio efficiency measure. Kybernetika 44(2):243–258Google Scholar
  15. Kopa M, Post T (2009) A portfolio optimality test based on the first-order stochastic dominance criterion. J Financ Quant Anal 44(5):1103–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuosmanen T (2004) Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Manag Sci 50(10):1390–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuosmanen T, Post T (2002) Nonparametric efficiency analysis under price uncertainty: a first-order stochastic dominance approach. J Prod Anal 17(3):183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy H (1985) Upper and lower bounds of put and call option value: stochastic dominance approach. J Financ 40(4):1197–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy H (1992) Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag Sci 38(4):555–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy H (2006) Stochastic dominance. Investment decision making under uncertainty. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Levy H, Hanoch G (1970) Relative effectiveness of efficiency criteria for portfolio selection. J Financ Quant Anal 5(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linton O, Maasoumi E, Whang Y-J (2005) Consistent testing for stochastic dominance under general sampling schemes. Rev Econ Stud 72:735–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linton O, Post T, Whang Y-J (2014) Testing for the stochastic dominance efficiency of a given portfolio. Econ J 17:S59–S74Google Scholar
  24. Luedtke J (2008) New formulations for optimization under stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 19:1433–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson RD, Pope R (1991) Bootstrapped insights into empirical applications of stochastic dominance. Manag Sci 37:1182–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Post T (2003) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J Financ 58:1905–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Post T, Kopa M (2013) General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria. Eur J Oper Res 230(2):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Post T, Fang Y, Kopa M (2014) Linear tests for DARA stochastic dominance. Forthcoming in Management Science.Google Scholar
  29. Post T, Versijp P (2007) Multivariate tests for stochastic dominance efficiency of a given portfolio. J Financ Quant Anal 42:489–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Post T, Van Vliet P, Levy H (2005) Risk aversion and skewness preference. J Bank Financ 185(3):1564–1573Google Scholar
  31. Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41Google Scholar
  32. Roman D, Darby-Dowman K, Mitra G (2006) Portfolio construction based on stochastic dominance and target return distributions. Math Program 108:541–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubinstein M (1974) An aggregation theorem for security markets. J Financ Econ 1(3):225–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Koç University Graduate School of BusinessSariyerTurkey

Personalised recommendations