Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing ergonomic risks by job rotation scheduling

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proverb “a change is as good as a rest” expresses one of the main advantages of job rotation. In this article, we examine ways to set-up effective job rotation schedules that balance ergonomic risks among workers. The practical relevance of the problem is comprehensively discussed on examples from the automobile industry. We present the ergonomic job rotation scheduling problem and show that it is NP-hard in the strong sense. Therefore, the development of specialized solution methods is important. Exploiting the problem structure, we propose a fast and effective smoothing heuristic which can be integrated into solution methods for computing initial solutions and/or as a local re-optimization procedure. We find that integrating the smoothing heuristic into a suited tabu search approach is particularly recommendable. In computational experiments, this combination of approaches is able to solve almost all instances of a practical data set in very short computation times of some seconds, whereas the standard solver FICO Xpress and the best-known heuristic from literature perform considerably worse concerning computation time and solution quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bokranz R, Landau K (2006) Produktivitätsmanagement von Arbeitssystemen. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

  • Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2009a) Production planning of mixed-model assembly lines: overview and extensions. Prod Plan Control 20:455–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2009) Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: survey, classification and model critique. Eur J Oper Res 192: 349–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard R, Dell’Amico M, Martello S (2009) Assignment problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

  • Butković P, Lewis S (2007) On the job rotation problem. Discrete Optim 4: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan BJ, Redfern MS, Norman B (2000) Designing safe job rotation schedules using optimization and heuristic search. Ergon 43: 543–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng TCE, Sin CCS (1990) A state-of-the-art review of parallel-machine scheduling research. Eur J Oper Res 47: 271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AM, Miralles C (2009) Job rotation in assembly line employing disabled workers. Int J Prod E 120: 625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Werra D, Hertz A (1989) Tabu search techniques: a tutorial and an application to neural networks. OR Spectr 11: 131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diego-Mas JA, Asensio-Cuesta S, Sanchez-Romero MA et al (2009) A multi-criteria genetic algorithm for the generation of job rotation schedules. Int J Ind Ergon 39: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN 614-1 (2006) Safety of machinery—ergonomic design principles—Part 1: Terminology and general principles. European Committee for Standardization

  • Eklund JA (1995) Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. Appl Ergon 26: 15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falck AC, Örtengren R, Högberg D (2010) The impact of poor assembly ergonomics on product quality: A cost-benefit analysis in car manufacturing. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 20: 24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W. Freeman and Company, New York

  • Glover F (1990) Tabu search: a tutorial. Interfaces 20: 74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen M, Davis K, Kotowski S, Aedla P, Dunning K (2005) Characteristics of job rotation in the Midwest US manufacturing sector. Ergon 28: 1721–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keir PJ, Sanei K, Holmes MWR (2011) Task rotation effects on upper extremity and back muscle activity. Appl Ergon 42: 814–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer PPFM, Visser B, Kemper HCG (1999) Job rotation as a factor in reducing physical workload at a refuse collecting department. Ergon 42: 1167–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer PPFM, van der Beek AJ, van Dieën JH, Visser B, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Effect of job rotation on need for recovery, musculoskeletal complaints, and sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints: a prospective study among refuse collectors. Am J Ind Med 47: 394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodree EJ, Geiger CD, Jiang X (2009) Taxonomy for integrating scheduling theory and human factors: Review and research opportunities. Int J Ind Ergon 39: 39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo F, Mirabelli G (2009) Effective design of an assembly line using modelling and simulation. J Simul 3: 50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau M (2003) Corporate ergonomics programme at automobiles Peugeot-Sochaux. Appl Ergon 34: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann WP, Winkel J, Medbo L, Magneberg R, Mathiassen SE (2006) Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26: 904–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2000) Final Ergonomics Program Standard. Federal register #64, pp 65768–66078

  • Osterman P (2000) Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare. Ind Labor Relat Rev 53: 176–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto A, Scholl A (2011) Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing. Eur J Oper Res 212: 277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raina SM, Dickerson CR (2009) The influence of job rotation and task order on muscle fatigue: a deltoid example. Work 34: 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissén D, Melin B, Sandsjö L, Dohns I, Lundberg U (2002) Psychophysiological stress reactions, trapezius muscle activity, and neck and shoulder pain among female cashiers before and after introduction of job rotation. Work Stress 16: 127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub K, Caragnano G, Britzke B, Bruder R (2010) The European Assembly Worksheet. In: Mandelo P, Karwowski W, Saarela K, Swuste P, Occhipinti E (eds) Proceedings of the VIII international conference on occupational risk prevention, Valencia, 5–7 May 2010

  • Sinn-Behrendt A, Schaub K, Winter G, Landau K (2004) Ergonomisches Frühwarnsystem ,,Ergo-FWS“. In: Landau K (ed) Montageprozesse gestalten: Fallbeispiele aus Ergonomie und Organisation, Ergonomia, Stuttgart

  • Seçkiner SU, Kurt M (2007) A simulated annealing approach to the solution of job rotation scheduling problems. Appl Math Comput 188: 31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seçkiner SU, Kurt M (2008) Ant colony optimization for the job rotation scheduling problem. Appl Math Comput 201: 149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharmmaphornphilas W, Norman BA (2004) A quantitative method for determining proper job rotation intervals. Ann Oper Res 128: 251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharmmaphornphilas W, Norman BA (2007) A methodology to create robust job rotation schedules. Ann Oper Res 155: 339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter R (2011) Comparing the minimum completion times of two longest-first scheduling-heuristics. Central Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10100-011-0217-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Scholl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otto, A., Scholl, A. Reducing ergonomic risks by job rotation scheduling. OR Spectrum 35, 711–733 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-012-0291-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-012-0291-6

Keywords

Navigation