OR Spectrum

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 633–661 | Cite as

Development and simulation analysis of real-time, dual-load yard truck control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals

Regular Article


We show how a seaport container terminal’s long-run average quay crane rate depends on the system that automatically assigns yard trucks to container transportation jobs in the terminal in real time. Several real-time, dual-load yard truck control systems are proposed and evaluated by a fully-integrated, discrete event simulation model of a vessel-to-vessel transshipment terminal. The model is designed to reproduce the microscopic, stochastic, real-time environment at a multiple-berth facility. Overall, the literature still lacks a comprehensive analysis that (1) considers different methods for controlling dual-load vehicles in real time within a fully-integrated, stochastic container terminal environment and (2) compares them in terms of an absolute global performance measure such as average quay crane rate. This paper provides such an analysis.


Seaport container terminal Real-time control Dynamic vehicle routing Gross crane rate Simulation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Briskorn D, Drexl A, Hartmann S (2006) Inventory-based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals. OR Spectrum 28: 611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dekker R, Voogd P, van Asperen E (2006) Advanced methods for container stacking. OR Spectrum 28: 563–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grunow M, Günther H-O, Lehmann M (2004) Dispatching multi-load AGVs in highly automated seaport container terminals. OR Spectrum 26: 211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grunow M, Günther H-O, Lehmann M (2006) Strategies for dispatching AGVs at automated seaport container terminals. OR Spectrum 28: 587–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Günther H-O, Kim K-H (2006) Container terminals and terminal operations. OR Spectrum 28: 437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim KH, Bae JW (2004) A look-ahead dispatching method for automated guided vehicles in automated port container terminals. Transp Sci 38: 224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim KH, Jeon SM, Ryu KR (2006) Deadlock prevention for automated guided vehicles in automated container terminals. OR Spectrum 28: 659–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kozan E (1997) Comparison of analytical and simulation planning models of seaport container terminals. Transp Plan Technol 20: 235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Legato P, Canonaco P, Mazza RM (2009) Yard crane management by simulation and optimisation. Maritime Econ Logist 11: 36–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu CI, Jula H, Ioannou PA (2002) Design, simulation, and evaluation of automated container terminals. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 3: 12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu C-I, Jula H, Vukadinovic K, Ioannou P (2004) Automated guided vehicle system for two container yard layouts. Transp Res Part C: Emerging Technol 12: 349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Monaco MF, Moccia L, Sammarra M (2009) Operations research for the management of a transhipment container terminal: the Gioia Tauro case. Maritime Econ Logist 11: 7–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murty KG, Liu J, Wan Y-W, Linn R (2005a) A decision support system for operations in a container terminal. Decis Support Syst 39: 309–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murty KG, Wan Y-W, Liu J, Tseng MM, Leung E, Lai K-K, Chiu HWC (2005b) Hongkong International Terminals gains elastic capacity using a data-intensive decision-support system. Interfaces 35: 61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nishimura E, Imai A, Papadimitriou S (2005) Yard trailer routing at a maritime container terminal. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 41: 53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parola F, Sciomachen A (2005) Intermodal container flows in a port system network: analysis of possible growths via simulation models. Int J Prod Econ 97: 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petering MEH (2007) Design, analysis, and real-time control of seaport container transshipment terminals. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  18. Petering MEH (2009) Effect of block width and storage yard layout on marine container terminal performance. Transp Res E 45: 591–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petering MEH, Murty KG (2009) Effect of block length and yard crane deployment systems on overall performance at a seaport container transshipment terminal. Comput Oper Res 36: 1711–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petering MEH, Wu Y, Li W, Goh M, de Souza R (2009) Development and simulation analysis of real-time yard crane control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals. OR Spectrum 31: 801–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saanen YA (2004) An approach for designing robotized marine container terminals. PhD dissertation, Technical University Delft, Delft, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectrum 30: 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26: 3–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vis IFA (2006) A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal. Int J Prod Econ 103: 680–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 147: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations