Advertisement

OR Spectrum

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 281–307 | Cite as

Inventory reservation and real-time order promising in a Make-to-Stock system

  • Richard PibernikEmail author
  • Prashant Yadav
Regular Article

Abstract

In this paper we consider a Make-to-Stock order fulfillment system facing random demand with random due date preferences from two classes of customers. We develop an integrated approach for reserving inventory in anticipation of future order arrivals from high priority customers and for order promising in real-time. Our research exhibits three distinct features: (1) we explicitly model uncertain due date preferences of the customers; (2) we consider multiple receipts in the planning horizon that can be utilized to fulfill customer orders; and (3) we choose to utilize a service level measure for reserving inventory rather than estimating short- and long-term implications of order promising with a penalty cost function. We propose an algorithm that exploits the time structure in order arrivals and time-phased material receipts to determine inventory reservations for high priority orders. Numerical experiments are conducted to investigate the performance and the benefits of the inventory reservation and order promising approach under varying system parameters.

Keywords

Make-to-Stock Inventory reservation Order fulfillment Order promising Inventory rationing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball MO, Chen C-Y and Zhao Z-Y (2004). Available to promise. In: Simchi-Levi, D, Wu, SD, and Shen, ZM (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the e-business era, pp 447–484. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Google Scholar
  2. Benjaafar S, ElHafsi M and de Vericourt F (2004). Demand allocation in multiple-product, multiple-facility, make-to-stock systems. Manage Sci 43: 1431–1448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen C-Y, Zhao Z-Y and Ball MO (2002). A model for batch advanced available-to-promise. Product Oper Manage 11(4): 424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen C-Y, Zhao Z-Y and Ball MO (2001). Quantity-and-due-date-quoting available-to-promise. Inform Syst Front 3(4): 477–488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleischmann B and Meyr H et al (2003). Customer orientation in advanced planning systems. In: Dyckhoff, H (eds) Supply chain management and reverse logistics, pp 297–321. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  6. Ha AY (1997a). Inventory rationing in a make-to-stock production systems with several demand classes and lost sales. Manage Sci 43: 1093–1103 Google Scholar
  7. Ha AY (1997b). Stock rationing policy for a make-to-stock production system with two priority classes and backordering. Naval Res Logist 43: 458–472 Google Scholar
  8. Hariharan R and Zipkin P (1995). Customer-order information, lead times and inventories. Manage Sci 41: 1599–1607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kilger C and Meyr H (2008). Demand fulfilment and ATP. In: Stadtler, H and Kilger, C (eds) Supply chain management and advanced planning, 4th edn, pp 181–198. Springer, Berlin CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meyr H (2007) Customer segmentation, allocation planning and order promising in make-to-stock production. OR Spect (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  11. Nahmias S and Demmy WS (1981). Operating characteristics of an inventory system with rationing. Manage Sci 27: 1236–1245 Google Scholar
  12. Pibernik R (2006). Managing stock-outs effectively with order fulfilment systems. J Manufact Technol Manage 17(6): 721–736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ronen D (1982). Measures of product availability. J Bus Logist 3(1): 45–58 Google Scholar
  14. Ronen D (1983). Inventory service levels–comparison of measures. Int J Oper Product Manage 3(2): 37–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Silver EA, Pyke DF and Peterson R (1998). Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  16. Topkis DM (1968). Optimal ordering and rationing policies in a non-stationary dynamic inventory model with n demand classes. Manage Sci 15: 160–176 Google Scholar
  17. Vericourt FD, Karaesmen F and Dallery Y (2000). Dynamic scheduling in a make-to-stock system: a partial characterization of optimal policies. Oper Res 48: 811–819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zipkin P (2000). Foundations of inventory management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Business School, International University Schloss Reichartshausen, Supply Management InstituteWiesbadenGermany
  2. 2.MIT-Zaragoza International Logistics Program, Zaragoza Logistics CenterZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations