Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of blending and conductive layer on the photoluminescence intensity of PFO thin films implemented for polymer light-emitting applications

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poly(9,9-di-n-octylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl) (PFO), referred to as light-emitting polymer, was utilized in this study to synthesize thin films for polymer light-emitting applications (PLED). Three thin films named P1, P2 and P3 refer to three different ways of film fabrication. P1 consists of only PFO, P2 consists of brilliant blue FCF blend PFO, while P3 consists of PFO on polyaniline conductive layer; all these thin films were deposited onto ITO-coated glass substrates (20 Ω) using Doctor blade method. Toluene had been used as the solvent of PFO material. P1 exhibits the smoothest surface (6.43 nm), which is consistent with the FESEM result. The surface roughness increases dramatically in the case of P2 (63.00 nm) with the presence of valleys and high peak protuberance. The surface roughness continues to significantly increase (152.00 nm) with deeper valleys for P3. PL intensity of the thin films was found to be dependent on the structural properties, chemical composition and optical features of these films. Film absorption was shown to increase with surface roughness, resulting in increased PL intensity and replacement of chemical bonds. P3 exhibited the highest PL intensity at 439.7 nm, which is attributable to the relatively lower amount of oxygen in the film structure, increasing both surface roughness and absorption of the film, in addition to the substitution of chemical bonds. P2 displayed higher PL intensity than that of P1 as well. Thus, PFO blend and using a polyaniline conductive layer in the PFO film structure enhance the PL intensity, thereby improving the applicability of PFO films-based polymer light-emitting diodes (PLED).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao X et al (2017) CN-Containing donor–acceptor-type small-molecule materials for thermally activated delayed fluorescence OLEDs. J Mater Chem C 5(31):7699–7714

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Konidena RK et al (2018) Tuning the photophysical and electroluminescence properties in asymmetrically tetrasubstituted bipolar carbazoles by functional group disposition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(28):24013–24027

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph V et al (2018) Tetra-substituted Dipolar Carbazoles: tuning optical and electroluminescence properties by linkage variation. Asian J Org Chem 7(8):1654–1666

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wex B, Kaafarani BR (2017) Perspective on carbazole-based organic compounds as emitters and hosts in TADF applications. J Mater Chemstry C 5(34):8622–8653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph V et al (2018) Vinyl-linked cyanocarbazole-based emitters: effect of conjugation and terminal chromophores on the photophysical and electroluminescent properties. ACS Omega 3(12):16477–16488

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Zee B et al (2022) Efficiency of polymer light-emitting diodes: a perspective. Adv Mater 34(13):2108887

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burroughes JH et al (1990) Light-emitting diodes based on conjugated polymers. Nature 347(6293):539–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gopikrishna P, Das D, Iyer PK (2017) Color tunable donor-acceptor electroluminescent copolymers: synthesis, characterization. Photophys Prop PLED Fabr ChemistrySelect 2(24):7044–7049

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Asbahi BA et al (2013) Influence of TiO 2 nanoparticles on enhancement of optoelectronic properties of PFO-based light emitting diode. J Nanomater 2013:130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lim WF, Quah HJ, Hassan Z (2016) Effects of annealing temperature on optical, morphological, and electrical characteristics of polyfluorene-derivative thin films on ITO glass substrate. Appl Opt 55(6):1198–1205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palilis LC et al (1999) Bright and efficient blue light-emitting diodes based on conjugated polymer blends in organic light-emitting materials and devices III. Int Soc Opt Photonics 3797:383–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fallahi A et al (2014) A novel ambipolar polymer: from organic thin-film transistors to enhanced air-stable blue light emitting diodes. J Mater Chem C 2(32):6491–6501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heydari R, Hosseini M (2016) A simple method for simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of brilliant blue fcf and sunset yellow fcf in food samples after cloud point extraction. J Chem Soc Pak 38(3):438–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang CC, Masi AN, Fernández L (2008) On-line micellar-enhanced spectrofluorimetric determination of rhodamine dye in cosmetics. Talanta 75(1):135–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vidotti EC et al (2005) Simultaneous determination of food dyes by first derivative spectrophotometry with sorption onto polyurethane foam. Anal Sci 21(2):149–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dharmadasa I, Burton R, Simmonds M (2006) Electrodeposition of CuInSe2 layers using a two-electrode system for applications in multi-layer graded bandgap solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90(15):2191–2200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Azevedo D et al (2017) Correlation between the PL and EL emissions of polyfluorene-based diodes using bilayers or polymer blends. Synth Met 233:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perevedentsev A et al (2015) Solution-crystallization and related phenomena in 9, 9-dialkyl-fluorene polymers. I Crystalline polymer-solvent compound formation for poly (9, 9-dioctylfluorene). J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 53(21):1481–1491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mostafaei A, Zolriasatein A (2012) Synthesis and characterization of conducting polyaniline nanocomposites containing ZnO nanorods. Prog Nat Scince: Mater Int 22(4):273–280

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bera A et al (2017) Flexible diode of polyaniline/ITO heterojunction on PET substrate. Appl Surf Sci 418:264–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jang S et al (2015) Multifunctional graphene optoelectronic devices capable of detecting and storing photonic signals. Nano Lett 15(4):2542–2547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ko S-J et al (2013) Highly efficient plasmonic organic optoelectronic devices based on a conducting polymer electrode incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Energy Environ Sci 6(6):1949–1955

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choy WC, Chan WK, Yuan Y (2014) Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic optoelectronic devices. Adv Mater 26(31):5368–5399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao Y et al (2015) Anomalously large interface charge in polarity-switchable photovoltaic devices: an indication of mobile ions in organic–inorganic halide perovskites. Energy Environ Sci 8(4):1256–1260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma A et al (2015) Electronic and chemical properties of ZnO in inverted organic photovoltaic devices. Org Electron 24:131–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J et al (2015) Solution synthesized p-type copper gallium oxide nanoplates as hole transport layer for organic photovoltaic devices. The J Phys Chem Lett 6(6):1071–1075

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kudo K et al (2000) Organic static induction transistor for display devices. Synth Met 111–112:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alassod A, Abedalwafa MA, Xu G (2021) Evaluation of polypropylene melt blown nonwoven as the interceptor for oil. Environ Technol 42(18):2784–2796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Alassod A et al (2022) Polypropylene-chitosan sponges prepared via thermal induce phase separation used as sorbents for oil spills cleanup. Polym Bull 80(5):4949–4964

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alassod A et al (2021) Polypropylene/Lignin/POSS nanocomposites: thermal and wettability properties, application in water remediation. Materials 14(14):3950

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shinde DV et al (2014) A coordination chemistry approach for shape controlled synthesis of indium oxide nanostructures and their photoelectrochemical properties. J Mater Chem A 2(15):5490–5498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Thirumoorthi M, Thomas Joseph Prakash J (2016) Structure, optical and electrical properties of indium tin oxide ultra thin films prepared by jet nebulizer spray pyrolysis technique. J Asian Ceramic Soc 4(1):124–132

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guo X et al (2016) Solution processable organic/inorganic hybrid ultraviolet photovoltaic detector. AIP Adv 6(5):055318

    Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Asbahi BA, Jumali MHH, Al-Gaashani R (2014) Efficient charge transfer mechanism in Polyfluorene/ZnO nanocomposite thin films. J Nanomater 2014:87

    Google Scholar 

  35. Palacios R et al (2010) β-phase morphology in ordered Poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene) nanopillars by template wetting method. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):35

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee HB et al (2018) Dependence of photoluminescence of Bi-doped Y2O3 phosphor thin films on oxygen content in the sputtering atmosphere. Thin Solid Films 650:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shyam P et al (2016) Structural and magnetic investigations on a wet chemically synthesized nanoscale S= 1/2 spin chain compound–CuSe 2 O 5. J Mater Chem C 4(3):611–621

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jafari MJ, (2017) Application of Vibrational Spectroscopy in Organic Electronics. Linköping University Electronic Press.

  39. Sabah FA et al (2016) Effect of light on the sensitivity of CuS thin film EGFET implemented as pH sensor. Int J Electrochem Sci 11:4380–4388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sabah FA et al (2016) Sensitivity of CuS and CuS/ITO EGFETs implemented as pH sensors. Appl Phys A 122(9):839

    Google Scholar 

  41. Alifragis Y et al (2005) Anion selective potentiometric sensor based on gallium nitride crystalline membrane. Electroanal: Int J Devot Fundam Pract Asp Electroanal 17(5):527–531

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang H et al (2020) Highly luminescent carbon dots as temperature sensors and “off-on” sensing of Hg2+ and biothiols. Dyes Pigments 173:107950

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sabah FA et al (2020) Influence of CuS powder concentration on the construction of hybrid PVA/CuS thin films for polymer light-emitting applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 31(4):3456–3465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Scholtz Ľ, Ladanyi L, Müllerová J (2014) Influence of surface roughness on optical characteristics of multilayer solar cells. Appl Phys 12(6):631–638

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gfroerer TH (2000) Photoluminescence in analysis of surfaces and interfaces. Encyclopedia Anal Chem Appl, Theory Instrument 67:3810

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bijumon C, Kumar VS (2016) Raman, PL and hall effect studies of Cdse thin film deposited by chemical bath deposition. Int J Sci Technol Res 5(05):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gómez A et al (2014) Optical absorption and visible photoluminescence from thin films of silicon phthalocyanine derivatives. Materials 7(9):6585–6603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yi S-S et al (2004) Enhanced luminescence of Gd2O3:Eu3+ thin-film phosphors by Li doping. Appl Phys Lett 84(3):353–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Shim KS et al (2009) Crystallinity and surface roughness dependent photoluminescence of Y1− xGdxVO4: Eu3+ thin films grown on Si (100) substrate. Thin Solid Films 517(17):5137–5140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao Y et al (2016) Supramolecular chirality in achiral polyfluorene: chiral gelation, memory of chirality, and chiral sensing property. Macromolecules 49:3214–3221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Qaid SMH et al (2021) Tuning the optical properties of MEH–PPV/PFO hybrid thin films via the incorporation of CsPbBr 3 quantum dots. Coatings 11(2):154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Malaysian Government and Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for the research facilities and the Research University (RUI) Grant No: 1001.PFIZIK.8011081 to conduct this work. Our gratitude also goes to the Institute of Nano Optoelectronics Research and Technology (INOR), Universiti Sains Malaysia. FAS would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for the Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Funding

The funding was provided by Universiti Sains Malaysia, (RUI) Grant No: (1001.PFIZIK.8011081), Abdul Razak Ibrahim

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Instrumentation Engineering Techniques, College of Medical Techniques, Alfarahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq

    Fayroz A. Sabah

  2. School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), 11800, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

    Ibrahim Abdul Razak

  3. Institute of Nano Optoelectronics Research and Technology (INOR), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), 11800, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

    E. A. Kabaa

  4. Faculty of Chemical Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Kompleks Pengajian Jejawi 2, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

    Nor Azura Abdul Rahim

  5. School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38541, Republic of Korea

    G. T. Chavan & Chan-Wook Jeon

Authors
  1. Fayroz A. Sabah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ibrahim Abdul Razak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. A. Kabaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nor Azura Abdul Rahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. T. Chavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chan-Wook Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fayroz A. Sabah or Ibrahim Abdul Razak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabah, F.A., Razak, I.A., Kabaa, E.A. et al. Influence of blending and conductive layer on the photoluminescence intensity of PFO thin films implemented for polymer light-emitting applications. Polym. Bull. 81, 5613–5626 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-04948-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-04948-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation