Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and evaluation of antimicrobial LDPE/TiO2 nanocomposites for food packaging applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymers used in food packaging should have unique properties, including anti-bacterial properties, good mechanical properties and permeability to air and water. To achieve these properties, some nanomaterials are incorporated into the polymeric matrix to be suitable for such a precise application. Thus, polymer nanocomposites emerged as one of the most important recent trends in the packaging materials industry. Here, titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) were synthesized by the sol–gel method and incorporated into pure low-density polyethylene (P-LDPE) at different concentrations (0, 2, 4, 8 wt %.). The prepared nanocomposites were characterized via a scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis. The size of TiO2-NPs is ranged from 13 to 47 nm. The crystallinity index of LDPE increased by the addition of TiO2-NPs from 0.32 to 0.55. Also, the thermal stability of LDPE improved by 67 °C. Studies of the mechanical properties, antibacterial activity and permeability measurements of nanocomposites films have demonstrated their potential for use in perishable food packaging. The results showed an increase in oxygen permeability from 55.25 cc/M2 day for P-LDPE to 72.84 cc/M2 day for LDPE-loaded with 8% TiO2. On the contrary, the impeded TiO2-NPs inside LDPE films reduced the water vapor transmission from 2.22 g/(m2 day) to 0.92 g/(m2 day). The tensile strength of P-LDPE increased from 16.7 MPa to 28.95 MPa for nanocomposite loaded with 8% TiO2. The ability of TiO2-NPs O2 to generate the potentially reactive radical species induced the antibacterial activity of LDPE to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Ghaani M, Cozzolino CA, Castelli G, Farris S (2016) An overview of the intelligent packaging technologies in the food sector. Trends Food Sci Technol 51:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.02.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Youssef AM, Bujdosó T, Hornok V, Papp S, Dékány I (2013) Structural and thermal properties of polystyrene nanocomposites containing hydrophilic and hydrophobic layered double hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci 77:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duizer LM, Robertson T, Han J (2009) Requirements for packaging from an ageing consumer’s perspective. Packag Technol Sci 22(4):187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nollet LM, Toldrá F (2006) Advanced technologies for meat processing, CRC Press

  5. Youssef AM (2013) Polymer nanocomposites as a new trend for packaging applications. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 52(7):635–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.762673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerry JP, O’Grady MN, Hogan SA (2006) Past, current and potential utilisation of active and intelligent packaging systems for meat and muscle-based products: a review. Meat Sci 74(1):113–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Mohamedy R, Abd El-Aziz ME, Kamel S (2019) Antifungal activity of chitosan nanoparticles against some plant pathogenic fungi in vitro. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 21(4):201–209

  8. El-Wakil AE-AA, Moustafa H, Youssef AM (2020) Antimicrobial low-density polyethylene/low-density polyethylene-grafted acrylic acid biocomposites based on rice bran with tea tree oil for food packaging applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 35(7):938–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720925140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Devlieghere F, Vermeiren L, Debevere J (2004) New preservation technologies: possibilities and limitations. Int Dairy J 14(4):273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong S-I, Rhim J-W (2008) Antimicrobial activity of organically modified nano-clays. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8(11):5818–5824. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2008.248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan B, Chatha SAS, Hussain AI, Zia KM, Akhtar N (2018) Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 109:1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Youssef A, Abd El-Aziz M, El-Sayed E, Abdel-Aziz M, El-Hakim AA, Kamel S, Turky G (2018) Morphological, electrical & antibacterial properties of trilayered Cs/PAA/PPy bionanocomposites hydrogel based on Fe3O4-NPs. Carbohyd Polym 196:483–493

  13. Corrales M, Fernández A, Han JH (2014) Chapter 7—antimicrobial packaging systems. In: Han JH (ed) Innovations in food packaging (second edition). Academic Press, San Diego, pp 133–170

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, Bigger SW (2003) Active packaging technologies with an emphasis on antimicrobial packaging and its applications. J Food Sci 68(2):408–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05687.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chau C-F, Wu S-H, Yen G-C (2007) The development of regulations for food nanotechnology. Trends Food Sci Technol 18(5):269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amna T, Yang J, Ryu K-S, Hwang IH (2015) Electrospun antimicrobial hybrid mats: Innovative packaging material for meat and meat-products. J Food Sci Technol 52(7):4600–4606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1508-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma B, Malik P, Jain P (2018) Biopolymer reinforced nanocomposites: a comprehensive review. Mater Today Commun 16:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.07.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernández MJ, Fernández MD (2020) Effect of organic modifier and clay content on non-isothermal cold crystallization and melting behavior of polylactide/organovermiculite. Nanocompos Polym 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020364

  19. Youssef AM, Hasanin MS, Abd El-Aziz ME, Turky GM (2021) Conducting chitosan/hydroxylethyl cellulose/polyaniline bionanocomposites hydrogel based on graphene oxide doped with Ag-NPs. Int J Biol Macromol 167:1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.097

  20. Cai G-B, Zhao G-X, Wang X-K, Yu S-H (2010) Synthesis of polyacrylic acid stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate nanoparticles and their application for removal of toxic heavy metal ions in water. J Phys Chem C 114(30):12948–12954. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103464p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chand S (2000) Review carbon fibers for composites. J Mater Sci 35(6):1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004780301489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Youssef AM, El-Sayed SM, El-Sayed HS, Salama HH, Dufresne A (2016) Enhancement of Egyptian soft white cheese shelf life using a novel chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose/zinc oxide bionanocomposite film. Carbohyd Polym 151:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Videira-Quintela D, Guillén F, Martin O, Montalvo G (2022) Antibacterial LDPE films for food packaging application filled with metal-fumed silica dual-side fillers. Food Packag Shelf Life 31:100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rojas K, Canales D, Amigo N, Montoille L, Cament A, Rivas LM, Gil-Castell O, Reyes P, Ulloa MT, Ribes-Greus A, Zapata PA (2019) Effective antimicrobial materials based on low-density polyethylene (LDPE) with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles. Compos B Eng 172:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Naggar ME, Hasanin M, Youssef AM, Aldalbahi A, El-Newehy MH, Abdelhameed RM (2020) Hydroxyethyl cellulose/bacterial cellulose cryogel dopped silver@titanium oxide nanoparticles: Antimicrobial activity and controlled release of Tebuconazole fungicide. Int J Biol Macromol 165:1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dumitriu C, Constantinescu A, Pirvu C (2021) Functionalized TiO2 nanotube platform for gliadin electroanalysis. Crystals 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11010022

  27. El-Maghrabi HH, Barhoum A, Nada AA, Moustafa YM, Seliman SM, Youssef AM, Bechelany M (2018) Synthesis of mesoporous core-shell CdS@TiO2 (0D and 1D) photocatalysts for solar-driven hydrogen fuel production. J Photochem Photobiol A 351:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sobana N, Muruganadham M, Swaminathan M (2006) Nano-Ag particles doped TiO2 for efficient photodegradation of Direct azo dyes. J Mol Catal A: Chem 258(1):124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2006.05.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Youssef AM, Malhat FM, Abd El-Hakim AFA (2013) Preparation and utilization of polystyrene nanocomposites based on TiO2 nanowires. Polym Plastics Technol Eng 52(3):228–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.735311

  30. Athir N, Shah SAA, Shehzad FK, Cheng J, Zhang J, Shi L (2020) Rutile TiO2 integrated zwitterion polyurethane composite films as an efficient photostable food packaging material. React Funct Polym 157:104733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Youssef AM, Assem FM, Abdel-Aziz ME, Elaaser M, Ibrahim OA, Mahmoud M, Abd El-Salam MH (2019) Development of bionanocomposite materials and its use in coating of Ras cheese. Food Chem 270:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.114

  32. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li D, Zhou L, Wang X, He L, Yang X (2019) Effect of crystallinity of polyethylene with different densities on breakdown strength and conductance property. Materials 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111746

  34. Dirim SN, Özden HÖ, Bayındırlı A, Esin A (2004) Modification of water vapour transfer rate of low density polyethylene films for food packaging. J Food Eng 63(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00276-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Polat S, Fenercioğlu H, Güçlü M (2018) Effects of metal nanoparticles on the physical and migration properties of low density polyethylene films. J Food Eng 229:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Son S, An J, Choi J, Lee J (2021) Fabrication of TiO2-embedded polyimide layer with high transmittance and improved reliability for liquid crystal displays 13(3):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030376

  37. Dryden M (2018) Reactive oxygen species: a novel antimicrobial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.08.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud E. Abd El-Aziz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Youssef, A.M., Abd El-Aziz, M.E. & Morsi, S.M.M. Development and evaluation of antimicrobial LDPE/TiO2 nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Polym. Bull. 80, 5417–5431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04346-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04346-4

Keywords

Navigation