Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 64, Issue 5, pp 445–457 | Cite as

Effect of dealcoholation of support in MgCl2-supported Ziegler–Natta catalysts on catalyst activity and polypropylene powder morphology

  • Ebrahim Jalali Dil
  • Saeed PourmahdianEmail author
  • Mohammad Vatankhah
  • Faramarz Afshar Taromi
Original Paper


Spherical support was produced using melt quenching method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that support particles have a rough surface morphology with small pore sizes. The size of primary particles determined to be about 50 nm. Produced particles were dealcoholated using hot nitrogen flow. In this study, the dealcoholation apparatus was similar to a fluidized bed reactor. It consists of three main zones: heating zone, bed zone, and expansion zone. This apparatus is capable to dealcoholate and elutriate support particles at the same time. Results showed a significant increase in specific pore volume and surface area of support particles during the dealcoholation. According to the obtained results, two mechanisms were proposed to explain effect of the dealcoholation on the morphology of support particles. Three dealcoholated samples of different alcohol contents were used in the catalyst preparation. Results showed that by decrease in alcohol content of support particles, specific surface area, and pore volume of catalysts increased. Moreover, titanium content of final catalysts increased slightly. Polymerization of propylene was carried out using obtained catalysts in slurry phase. An increase in catalyst activity and enhancement of polypropylene powder morphology were observed as the alcohol content of support particles decreased.


Ziegler–Natta catalyst Dealcoholation Spherical support Polypropylene Slurry polymerization 


  1. 1.
    Moore EP (1998) The rebirth of polypropylene: supported catalysts. Hanser, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galli P, Vecellio G (2001) Technology, driving force behind innovation and growth of polyolefins. Prog Polym Sci 26:1287–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Monji M, Pourmahdian S, Vatankhah M, Afshar Taromi F (2009) Synthesis of highly improved Ziegler–Natta catalyst. J Appl Polym Sci 112:3663–3668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ling Y, Chen W, Xie L, Liu Y, Zheng G (2008) Preparation of novel microspherical MgCl2-based titanium catalyst for propylene polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 110:3448–3454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang L, Yu HJ, Ma ZL, Ye ZY, Jiang S, Feng L, Gu X (2006) Preparation of novel MgCl2-adduct supported spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst for α-olefin Polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 99:945–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ye ZY, Wang L, Feng L, Gu X, Chen H, Zhang P, Pan J, Jiang S, Feng L (2002) Novel spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst for polymerization and copolymerization. I. Spherical MgCl2 support. J Polym Sci A 40:3112–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forte MC, Coutinho MFB (1996) Highly active magnesium chloride supported Ziegler–Natta catalysts with controlled morphology. Eur Polym J 32:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sozzani P, Bracco S, Comotti A, Simonutti R, Camurati I (2003) Stoichiometric compounds of magnesium dichloride with ethanol for the supported Ziegler–Natta catalysis: first recognition and multidimensional MAS NMR Study. J Am Chem Soc 125:12881–12893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferraris M, Rosati F, Parodi S, Giannetti E, Motroni G, Albizzati E (1983) Catalyst components and catalysts for the polymerization of alpha-olefins. US Patent 4,399,054Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Govoni G, Ciarrocchi A, Sacchetti M (1993) Crystalline olefin polymers and copolymers in the form of spherical particles at high porosity. US Patent 5,231,119Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jamjah R, Zohuri GH, Vaezi J, Ahmadjo S, Nekomanesh M, Pouryari M (2006) Morphological study of spherical MgCl2·nEtOH supported TiCl4 Ziegler–Natta catalyst for polymerization of ethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 101:3829–3834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu R, Liu D, Wang S, Wang N, Mao B (2007) Preparation of spherical MgCl2-supported bis(phenoxyimine) zirconium complex for ethylene polymerization. J Mol Catal A 263:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guan Z, Zheng Y, Jiao S (2002) Spherical MgCl2-supported MAO pre-catalysts: preparation, characterization and activity in ethylene polymerization. J Mol Catal A 188:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evangelisti D, Collina G (2006) Magnesium dichloride-ethanol adducts and catalyst components obtained therefrom. US Patent 7,060,763Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evangelisti D, Collina G, Fusco O, Sacchetti M (2006) Magnesium dichloride-ethanol adduct and catalyst components obtained therefrom. US Patent 7,087,688Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sacchetti M, Collina G, Ciarrocchi A (1990) Components and catalysts for the polymerization of olefins. Eur Patent 0,395,083Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng X, Loos J (2006) Morphology evolution in the early stages of olefin polymerization. Macromol Symp 236:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Govoni G, Sacchetti M, Ciarrocchi A (1993) Crystalline propylene polymers and copolymers in the form of spherical particles at high porosity. US Patent 5,236,962Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chien JCW, Wu JC, Kuo CI (1982) Magnesium chloride supported high mileage catalysts for olefin polymerization. I. Chemical composition and oxidation states of titanium. J Polym Sci A 20:2019–2032Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ebrahim Jalali Dil
    • 1
  • Saeed Pourmahdian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammad Vatankhah
    • 1
  • Faramarz Afshar Taromi
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymer Engineering DepartmentAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations