Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Natural Rubber/ Reclaimed Rubber Blends

  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Addition of reclaimed rubber affected mechanical properties, processing and rheological behavior of rubber compounds. Sulfur left in reclaimed rubber affected curing process of NR/reclaimed rubber blends. The most suitable curing was achieved with ratio 1:1 of natural rubber and reclaimed rubber which was used in this study. Presence of fillers in reclaimed rubber, non-homogeneity of phases, non-uniform filler dispersion and lower molecular weight of reclaimed rubber due to chain scission in reclaiming process caused diminishing of mechanical properties of NR/reclaimed blends, particularly dynamic-based properties. Reclaimed rubber also affected rheological behavior of natural rubber. In a strain sweep viscoelastic test, it could be observed that NR/reclaimed blend show more non-linear viscoelastic and viscous behavior than predicted one which was due to non-homogenized phases. This non-homogenized morphology was detected using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the blend with ratio 1:1 had the most homogenized morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.D. Sreeja (2003) Polym. Plast. Tech. and Eng., 42, 2, 236–252

  2. Jin Kuk Kim (2000), J. Ap. Pol. Sci., 78, 8, 1573–1577

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.A. Phadke (1983) Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 56, 4, 726–736

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.R. Fix (1980) Elastomerics, 112, 6, 38–40

  5. V.Yu Levin (1996) Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 69, 1, 92 - 104

  6. M. Tapale (1998) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 70, 10, 2007–2019

  7. T.D. Sreeja (2000) Polym. Plast. Technol.Eng. 39, 3, 501–512

  8. G. Mathew (2003) Progress in Rubber Plastics Recycling Technology, 19, 4, 205–230

  9. N. Sombatsompop (2003) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 87, 10, 1723–1731

  10. S.G. Reena (1997) Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 29, 1, 1997, 83–91

  11. T.D. Sreeja (2002) Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 4, 1, 77–89

  12. P.A. Nelson (2004) Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 43, 1, 245–260

  13. P.A. Nelson (2002) Progress in Rubber Plastics Recycling Technology, 18, 2, 85–97

  14. T.D. Sreeja (2002) Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 34, 2, 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.A. Nelson (2003) Progress in Rubber Plastics Recycling Technology, 19, 3, 171–188

  16. T.D. Sreeja (2001) Advance in Polymer Technology, 20, 4, 281–288

  17. P. Neratia (2002) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 83, 9, 2035–2042

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.Al-malaika (1989) Polymer Degradation and Stability, 26, 1, 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Tantayanon (2004) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 91, 1, 510–515

  20. H. Pawlowski (1992) Rubber World, 206, 3, 35–40

  21. T. Sajjayanukul (2005) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 97, 6, 2197–2203

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Barrès (2003) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 87, 1, 31–41

  23. J.L. Leblanc (2005) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 95, 1, 90–106

  24. J.L. Leblanc (2001) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 80, 11, 2093–2104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Darestani Farahani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darestani Farahani, T., Bakhshandeh, G. & Abtahi, M. Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Natural Rubber/ Reclaimed Rubber Blends. Polym. Bull. 56, 495–505 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0508-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0508-4

Keywords

Navigation