Dagstuhl Manifesto

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Allen C, Smit I, Wallach W (2005) Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inform Technol 7:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson M, Leigh Anderson S, Berenz V (2016) Ensuring Ethical Behaviour from Autonomous Systems. In: Proc AAAI Workshop: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Assistive Technologies and Smart Environments. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW16/paper/view/12555

  3. 3.

    Anderson M, Leigh Anderson S (2014) GenEth: A General Ethical Dilemma Analyzer. In: Proc. AAAI, pp. 253–261. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI14/paper/view/8308

  4. 4.

    Arkin RC, Ulam P, Wagner AR (2012) Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Systems: Enforcement, Moral Emotions, Dignity, Trust, and Deception. In: Proc. IEEE 100(3):571–589. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6099675/?arnumber=6099675

  5. 5.

    Broome J (1991) Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Broome J (2004) Weighing Lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brown C (2011) Consequentialize This. Ethics 121(4):749–771. www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/660696

  8. 8.

    Christie GC (2000) The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9520-9

  9. 9.

    Coleman JL (2002) Risks and Wrongs. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253616.001.0001

  10. 10.

    Dennis LA, Fisher M, Slavkovik M, Webster M (2016) Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems. Robot Auton Syst 77:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.11.012

  11. 11.

    Dietrich F, List C (2016) What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories. Working paper, London School of Economics. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/PDF-files/WhatMatters.pdf

  12. 12.

    Foot P (1967) The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect in Virtues and Vices. Oxford Review, Number 5. http://philpapers.org/archive/FOOTPO-2.pdf

  13. 13.

    French PA (1984) Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Halpern JY, Pass R, Seeman L (2014) Decision theory with resource-bounded agents. Topics Cogn Sci 6:245–257. doi:10.1111/tops.12088

  15. 15.

    Horty J (2012) Reasons as Defaults. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    List C, Pettit P (2011) Group Agency: The Design, Possibility, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Scanlon TM (1998) What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674004238&content=reviews

  18. 18.

    Sergot M (2013) Normative Positions. In: Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, edited by: Gabbay D, Horty J, van der Meyden R, Parent X, van der Torre L, Chapter 5, pp. 353–406, College Publications, London

  19. 19.

    Slote M (1989) Beyond Optimizing: A Study of Rational Choice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Winfield A, Blum C, Liu W (2014) Towards an Ethical Robot: Internal Models, Consequences and Ethical Action Selection. In: Advances in Autonomous Robotics Systems, edited by: Mistry M, Leonardis A, Witkowski M, Melhuish C, LNCS Vol 8717, pp. 85–96, Springer, Heidelberg

  21. 21.

    Ege B, Humm B, Reibold A (eds) (2015) Corporate Semantic Web – Wie semantische Anwendungen in Unternehmen Nutzen stiften (in German). Springer, ISBN 978-3-642-54885-7

  22. 22.

    Gernhardt B, Vogel T, Givehchi M, Wang L, Hemmje M (2016) Knowledge-based Production Planning within the Reference Planning Process supporting Manufacturing Change Management. ASME 2016 – Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2016), Blacksburg, VA, USA

  23. 23.

    Graefe A, Haim M, Haarmann B, Brosius H-B (2016) Readers’ Perception of Computer-Written News: Credibility, Expertise, and Readability. In: Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, edited by: Tumber H, Zelizer B, Vol. 17, No. 4. Sage Publishing, London

  24. 24.

    Nübling D, Fahlbusch F, Heuser R (2015) Namen, 2. Auflage. Narr, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hoppe T, Humm B, Schade U, Heuss T, Hemmje M, Vogel T, Gernhardt B (2016) Corporate semantic web – applications, technology, methodology. Informatik-Spektrum 39(1)

  26. 26.

    Wendt M, Büscher C, Herta C, Gerlach M, Messner M, Kemmerer S, Tietze W, Düwiger H (2009) Extracting Domain Terminologies from the World Wide Web. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Web as Corpus Workshop (WAC5), Donostia-San Sebastián, Basque Country, Spain, 7 September 2009, https://www.sigwac.org.uk/attachment/wiki/WAC5/WAC5_proceedings.pdf, last access: 19.8.2016

  27. 27.

    Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781, last access: 19.8.2016

  28. 28.

    Sowa JF (2004) The Challenge of Knowledge Soup. In: Proc. First International WordNet Conference

  29. 29.

    Schäfermeier R, Paschke A (2014) Aspect-Oriented Ontologies: Dynamic Modularization Using Ontological Metamodeling. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems – Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, FOIS 2014, 22–25 September 2014, pp. 199–212, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  30. 30.

    Schäfermeier R, Paschke A (2016) Weaving Ontology Aspects Using a Catalog of Structural Ontology Design Patterns. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics, Cape Town, South Africa, 22–25 April 2016

  31. 31.

    Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 10.2.2013, Nr. 6, S. 21; Ch. Siedenbiedel, Tagesspiegel, rtr, Nr. 22202, 2014

  32. 32.

    Bloomberg News Ed. Pettersson, BofA, Citi Sued by University of California Over Libor 26.6.2013

  33. 33.

    Spiegel ONLINE Wirtschaft, St. Kaiser, LiborAffäre: Deutsche Bank wollte Skandalhändler mit 80 Millionen entlohnen, 13.2.2013

  34. 34.

    Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, Ch. Siedenbiedel, Die Libor-Bande, 10.2.2013, Nr. 6, S.21

Download references

Author information


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dagstuhl Manifesto. Informatik Spektrum 39, 467–489 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-016-0998-x

Download citation