Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantic-Web-Technologien in der Arbeitsplatzvermittlung

  • Hauptbeitrag
  • SEMANTIC-WEB-TECHNOLOGIEN
  • Published:
Informatik-Spektrum Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

The importance of the Internet for job procurement is increasing for the reason that three quarters of the people in the employment age are online. On the other hand because ever more companies are publishing their job offers on the Web. However, due to the large number of openings published online it is almost impossible for job seekers and job portals to gain an overview of the entire employment market. Since job offers lack semantically meaningful annotations, the search and integration into databases are made highly difficult. Applying Semantic Web technologies to the e-recruitment process provides advantages for all participants in the market. In this paper we describe a method for analysing the domain-specific language of an application domain. We use this method to describe the e-recruitment process and the necessary ontologies for annotating job offers and job applications. In conclusion, we present the prototypical implementation of the scenario based on Semantic Web, especially semantic matching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alan Y (2003) Konstruktion der KOWIEN-Ontologie. Projektbericht 2/2003, Institut für Produktion und Industrielles Informationsmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen, www.kowien.uni-essen.de/publikationen/konstruktion.pdf, 2003, Abruf am 23.08.2005

  2. Becker J, Brelage C, Falk T, Thygs M (2004) Hybrid Information Systems – Position the Web Information Systems Artefact. In: Ahlert D, Aufderheide D, Backhaus K, Becker J, Grob H-L, Hartwig K-H, Hoeren T, Holling H, Holznagel B, Klein S, Pfingsten A, Röder K (eds) Internetökonomie und Hybridität, No. 11. Arbeitbericht des Kompetenzzentrums Internetökonomie und Hybridität Münster, Münster

  3. Becker J, Brelage C, Klose K, Thygs M (2003) Conceptual Modeling of Semantic Navigation Structures: The MoSeNa-Approach. In: Proc. Fifth ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pp 118–125

  4. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bizer C, Mochol M, Westphal D (2004) Recruitment. In: Tolksdorf R, Eckstein R (eds) XML Clearinghouse Report 8. ISSN 1861-1230. April 2004. http://xmlwww.mi.fu-berlin.de/webportal/reports/Recruitment.pdf

  6. Bizer C, Heese R, Mochol M, Oldakowski R, Tolksdorf R, Eckstein R (2005) The Impact of Semantic Web Technologies on Job Recruitment Processes. In: Proc. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety, 7. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005, Bamberg, Germany, pp 1367–1382, Februar 2005

  7. Bundesagentur für Arbeit: Berufskennziffern. Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://berufenet.arbeitsamt.de/download/public/dkz_daten/. Abruf am 25.07.2005

  8. Chen H, Finin T, Joshi A (2003) An Ontology for Context-Aware Pervasive Computing Environments. Knowl. Eng. Rev., Special Issue on Ontologies for Distributed Systems 18(3):197–207

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crosswater Systems Ltd. Die Jobbörsen in Deutschland. Dossier #4, http://www.crosswater-systems.com/ 2005

  10. Daconta M, Obrst L, Smith K (2003) The Semantic Web. A Guide to the Future of XML, Web Services, and Knowledge Management. Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dey A (2001) Understanding and Using Context. Pers Ubiquit Comput J 5(1):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dostal W, Jeckle M, Melzer I, Zengler B (2004) Semantic Web. OBJEKTspektrum, Ausgabe 05/2004, http://www.sigs.de/publications/os/2004/05/dostal_melzer_OS_05_04.pdf, Abruf am 15.04.2005

  13. van Eimeren B, Gerhard H, Frees B (2004) ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 2004. Media Perspektiven 8/2004, S. 350–370

  14. Fernandez-Lopez M, Gomez-Perez A (2002) Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Knowl Eng Rev 17(2):129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauch S, Chaffee J, Pretschner A (2003) Ontology-Based Personalized Search and Browsing. Web Intel Agent Syst 1(3–4):219–234

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grüninger M, Fox M (1995) Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. In: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, im Rahmen von IJCAI’95, 1995, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/1337/http:zSzzSzwww.ie.utoronto.cazSzEILzSzpubliczSzmethod.pdf/grninger95methodology.pdf, Abruf am 15.08.2005

  17. HR-XML Consortium: HR-XML-Standards. Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://hr.xml.org/standards/. Abruf am 26.07.2005

  18. Kanemitsu H, Kamada T (1999) POIX: Point Of Interest eXchange Language Specification. W3C Note, 1999. Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://www.w3.org/TR/poix. Abruf am 30.06.2005

  19. Kaufmann M, Klebel M (2003) E-Recruiting – einfach, effizient und dennoch erschwinglich. http://www.smarthrweb.ch/presse-hrtoday_umfrage_e_recruiting.pdf, 2003, Abruf am 15.09.2005

  20. Manola F, Miller E (2004) RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation, Februar 2004. Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer. Abruf am 30.06.2005

  21. Mochol M, Oldakowski R, Heese R (2004) Ontology based Recruitment Process. In: Dadam P, Reichert M (eds) Proc. GI Jahrestagung (2), Workshop Semantische Technologien für Informationsportale, Ulm, Deutschland, pp 198–202

  22. Paslaru Bontas E, Mochol M (2005) A Cost Model for Ontology Engineering. Technical Report, TR-B-05-03, FU Berlin, ftp://ftp.inf.fu-berlin.de/pub/reports/tr-b-05-03.pdf, 2005

  23. Poole J, Campbell JA (1995) A Novel Algorithm for Matching Conceptual and Related Graphs. In: Ellis G et al. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. Volume 954 of LNAI, Springer Verlag, pp 293–307

  24. Simon HA (1962) The Architecture of Complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 15(4):467–482

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith M, Welty C, McGuinness D (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation, Februar 2004. Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/. Abruf am 30.06.2005

  26. Statistisches Bundesamt: Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige, Ausgabe 2003 (WZ2003) Elektronisch veröffentlicht: http://www.destatis.de/allg/d/klassif/wz2003.htm. Abruf am 25.07.2005

  27. Sure Y, Maedche A, Staab S (2000) Leveraging Corporate Skill Knowledge – From ProPer to OntoProPer. In: Mahling D, Reimer U (eds) Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, pp 22–28

  28. Uschold M, King M (1995) Towards a methodology for building ontologies. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, im Rahmen von IJCAI’95, 1995, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/11430/ftp:zSzzSzftp.aiai.ed.ac.ukzSzpubzSzdocumentszSz1996zSz96-es96-unified-method.pdf/uschold96building.pdf. Abruf am 10.08.2005

  29. vom Brocke J, Hybride Systeme. Begriffsbestimmung und Forschungsperspektiven für die Wirtschaftsinformatik, Arbeitsbericht Nr. 2 des Kompetenzzentrums Internetökonomie und Hybridität Münster, http://hybride-systeme.uni-muenster.de/arbeitsberichte.htm, Abruf am 25.07.2005

  30. Wedekind H (1991) Datenbanksysteme I. Eine konstruktive Einführung in die Datenverarbeitung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, 3. Aufl. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim et al.

  31. Zadorozhny V, Chrysanthis P (2004) Location-Based Computing. In: Kamiri H (ed) Telegeoinformatics: Location-based computing and services. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 145–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), Leonardo-Campus 3, 48149, Münster, Deutschland

    Thorsten Falk, Daniel Pfeiffer & Michael Thygs

  2. Institut für Informatik, Datenbanken und Informationssysteme, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Deutschland

    Ralf Heese

  3. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland

    Christian Kaspar

  4. Institut für Informatik, AG Netzbasierte Informationssysteme, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustr. 9, 14195, Berlin, Deutschland

    Malgorzata Mochol & Robert Tolksdorf

Authors
  1. Thorsten Falk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ralf Heese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Kaspar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Malgorzata Mochol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Pfeiffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Thygs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert Tolksdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Falk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falk, T., Heese, R., Kaspar, C. et al. Semantic-Web-Technologien in der Arbeitsplatzvermittlung. Informatik Spektrum 29, 201–209 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-006-0061-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-006-0061-4

Search

Navigation