Skip to main content
Log in

Predator migration in response to prey density: What are the consequences?

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

A predator-prey metapopulation model with two identical patches and only migration of the predator is investigated. Local predator-prey interaction is described by the so-called Rosenzweig-MacArthur model, while the migration term of the predator is put in a nonlinear form, which is derived by extending the Holling time budget argument to migration. In particular, a dimensionless parameter θ is introduced to quantify the migration tendency of predators while they are handling their prey, which gives rise to a family of models connecting two extremes: predators have no inclination to migrate while handling prey (θ = 0) and standard diffusion (θ = 1). Various aspects of the model, including changes in the number and the stability of equilibria and limit cycles, are investigated. We then focus on the key question: “Does spatial structure lead to a substantial damping of the violent oscillations exhibited by many predator-prey models?”. It is known that the answer is “yes” if one adopts standard diffusion (θ = 1). However, we present substantial evidence that the answer is “no” if one takes θ = 0. We conclude that the migration submodel is an important constituent of a spatial predator-prey model and that the issue deserves scrutiny, both experimentally and theoretically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 26 June 2000 / Revised version: 4 May 2001 / Published online: 12 October 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Diekmann, O. Predator migration in response to prey density: What are the consequences?. J Math Biol 43, 561–581 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850100107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850100107

Keywords

Navigation