Abstract
Scientists measure rate constants associated with biochemical reactions in an optical biosensor—an instrument in which ligand molecules are convected through a flow cell over a surface to which receptors are immobilized. We quantify transport effects on such reactions by modeling the associated convection-diffusion equation with a reaction boundary condition. In experimental situations, the full PDE model reduces to a set of unwieldy integrodifferential equations (IDEs). Employing common physical assumptions, we may reduce the system to an ODE model, which is more useful in practice, and which can be easily adapted to the inverse problem of finding rate constants. The results from the ODE model compare favorably with numerical simulations of the IDEs, even outside its range of validity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.







References
Austin S (2009) Haemostasis. Medicine 37(3):133–136
Balgi G, Leckband DE, Nitsche JM (1995) Transport effects on the kinetics of protein-surface binding. Biophys J 68(6):2251–2260
Bertucci C, Piccoli A, Pistolozzi M (2007) Optical biosensors as a tool for early determination of absorption and distribution parameters of lead candidates and drugs. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 10(6):433–440
Bird RB (2002) Transport phenomena. Appl Mech Rev 55(1):R1–R4
BIAcore T200 data file (2013) General electric life sciences, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Björkgatan 30, 751 84 Uppsala
Cooper MA (2009) Sensor surfaces and receptor deposition. In: Cooper MA (ed) Label-free bioesnsors. Cambridge University Press, New York
de la Torre JG, Huertas ML, Carrasco B (2000) Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure. Biophys J 78(2):719–730
Edwards DA (1999) Estimating rate constants in a convection-diffusion system with a boundary reaction. IMA J Appl Math 63(1):89–112
Edwards DA (2001) The effect of a receptor layer on the measurement of rate constants. Bull Math Biol 63(2):301–327
Edwards DA (2004) Refining the measurement of rate constants in the BIAcore. J Math Biol 49(3):272–292
Edwards DA (2006a) Convection effects in the BIAcore dextran layer: surface reaction model. Bull Math Biol 68:627–654
Edwards DA (2006b) Convection effects in thin reaction zones: applications to BIAcore. SIAM J Appl Math 66(6):1978–1997
Edwards DA (2011) Transport effects on surface reaction arrays: biosensor applications. Math Biosci 230(1):12–22
Edwards DA, Goldstein B, Cohen DS (1999) Transport effects on surface-volume biological reactions. J Math Biol 39(6):533–561
Edwards DA, Jackson S (2002) Testing the validity of the effective rate constant approximation for surface reaction with transport. Appl Math Lett 15(5):547–552
Evans RM, Edwards DA (2017) Transport effects on multiple-component reactions in optical biosensors. Submitted
Friedberg EC (2005) Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6(12):943–953
Gervais T, Jensen KF (2006) Mass transport and surface reactions in microfluidic systems. Chem Eng Sci 61(4):1102–1121
Glaser W (1993) Antigen-antibody binding and mass transport by convection and diffusion to a surface: a two-dimensional computer model of binding and dissociation kinetics. Anal Biochem 213(1):152–161
Goldstein B, Coombs D, He X, Pineda AR, Wofsy C (1999) The influence of transport on the kinetics of binding to surface receptors: applications to cells and BIAcore. J Mol Recognit 12(5):293–299
Hu G, Gao Y, Li D (2007) Modeling micropatterned antigen-antibody binding kinetics in a microfluidic chip. Biosens Bioelectron 22(7):1403–1409
Jenkins J, Prabhakarpandian B, Lenghaus K, Hickman J, Sundaram S (2004) Fluidics-resolved estimation of protein adsorption kinetics in a biomicrofluidic system. Anal Biochem 331(2):207–215
Lagrée P-Y, Ivan-Fernolendt A (2004) Direct comparison of simplified models of surface reacting flows in flow chambers. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 26(2):133–143
Lehmann AR, Niimi A, Ogi T, Brown S, Sabbioneda S, Wing JF, Kannouche PL, Green CM (2007) Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. DNA Repair 6(7):891–899
Liedberg B, Lundström I, Stenberg E (1993) Principles of biosensing with an extended coupling matrix and surface plasmon resonance. Sens Actuators B Chem 11(1):63–72
Myszka DG, He X, Dembo M, Morton Thomas A, Goldstein B, Goldstein B (1998) Extending the range of rate constants available from BIAcore: interpreting mass transport-influenced binding data. Biophys J 75(2):583–594
O’Shannessy DJ (1994) Determination of kinetic rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions: a critique of the surface plasmon resonance literature. Curr Opin Biotechnol 5(1):65–71
O’Shannessy DJ, Winzor DJ (1996) Interpretation of deviations from pseudo-first-order kinetic behavior in the characterization of ligand binding by biosensor technology. Anal Biochem 236(2):275–283
Plosky BS, Woodgate R (2004) Switching from high-fidelity replicases to low-fidelity lesion-bypass polymerases. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14(2):113–119
Raghaven M, Chen MY, Gastinel LN, Bjorkman PJ (1994) Investigation of the interaction between class I MHC-related \(\text{ F }_{\rm c}\) receptor and its immunoglobulin G ligand. Immunity 1(4):303–315
Rich RL, Cannon MJ, Jenkins J, Pandian P, Sundaram S, Magyar R, Brockman J, Lambert J, Myszka DG (2008) Extracting kinetic rate constants from surface plasmon resonance array systems. Anal Biochem 373(1):112–120
Rich RL, Myszka D (2011) Survey of the 2009 commercial optical biosensor literature. J Mol Recognit 24(6):892–914
Rich RL, Myszka DG (2009) Extracting kinetic rate constants from binding responses. In: Cooper MA (ed) Label-free biosensors. Cambridge University Press, New York
Schuck P (1996) Kinetics of ligand binding to receptor immobilized in a polymer matrix, as detected with an evanescent wave biosensor. I. a computer simulation of the influence of mass transport. Biophys J 70(3):1230
Schuck P (1997) Use of surface plasmon resonance to probe the equilibrium and dynamic aspects of interactions between biological macromolecules. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 26(1):541–566
Schuck P, Zhao H (2010) The role of mass transport limitation and surface heterogeneity in the biophysical characterization of macromolecular binding processes by SPR biosensing. In: Mol N, Fischer M (eds) Surface plasmon resonance. Methods in molecular biology (methods and protocols), vol 627. Humana Press
Svitel J, Boukari H, Van Ryk D, Willson RC, Schuck P (2007) Probing the functional heterogeneity of surface binding sites by analysis of experimental binding traces and the effect of mass transport limitation. Biophys J 92(5):1742–1758
Yarmush ML, Patankar DB, Yarmush DM (1996) An analysis of transport resistances in the operation of BIAcore; implications for kinetic studies of biospecific interactions. Mol Immunol 33(15):1203–1214
Zhuang Z, Johnson RE, Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S, Benkovic SJ (2008) Regulation of polymerase exchange between Pol\(\eta \) and Pol\(\delta \) by monoubiquitination of PCNA and the movement of DNA polymerase holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(14):5361–5366
Zumbrum M, Edwards DA (2014) Multiple surface reactions in arrays with applications to optical biosensors. Bull Math Biol 76(7):1783–1808
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was done with the support of the NSF, under award number NSF-DMS 1312529. The first author would also like acknowledge the support of the National Research Council in the form of a postdoctoral fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, R.M., Edwards, D.A. Receptor heterogeneity in optical biosensors. J. Math. Biol. 76, 795–816 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1158-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1158-x
Keywords
- Biochemistry
- Optical biosensors
- Kinetic rate constants
- Partial differential equations
- Asymptotic analysis
- Numerical methods
Mathematics Subject Classification
- 92E20
- 35Q92
- 41A60
- 65D99