Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A stoichiometric organic matter decomposition model in a chemostat culture

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodegradation, the disintegration of organic matter by microorganism, is essential for the cycling of environmental organic matter. Understanding and predicting the dynamics of this biodegradation have increasingly gained attention from the industries and government regulators. Since changes in environmental organic matter are strenuous to measure, mathematical models are essential in understanding and predicting the dynamics of organic matters. Empirical evidence suggests that grazers’ preying activity on microorganism helps to facilitate biodegradation. In this paper, we formulate and investigate a stoichiometry-based organic matter decomposition model in a chemostat culture that incorporates the dynamics of grazers. We determine the criteria for the uniform persistence and extinction of the species and chemicals. Our results show that (1) if at the unique internal steady state, the per capita growth rate of bacteria is greater than the sum of the bacteria’s death and dilution rates, then the bacteria will persist uniformly; (2) if in addition to this, (a) the grazers’ per capita growth rate is greater than the sum of the dilution rate and grazers’ death rate, and (b) the death rate of bacteria is less than some threshold, then the grazers will persist uniformly. These conditions can be achieved simultaneously if there are sufficient resources in the feed bottle. As opposed to the microcosm decomposition models’ results, in a chemostat culture, chemicals always persist. Besides the transcritical bifurcation observed in microcosm models, our chemostat model exhibits Hopf bifurcation and Rosenzweig’s paradox of enrichment phenomenon. Our sensitivity analysis suggests that the most effective way to facilitate degradation is to decrease the dilution rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsdate R, Prentki R, Fenchel T (1974) Phosphorus cycle of model ecosystems: significance for decomposer food chains and effect of bacterial grazers. Oikos 25:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratbak G (1985) Bacterial biovolume and biomass estimations. Appl Environ Microbiol 49(6):1488–1493

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron DA, Goldman JC, Andersen OK, Dennett MR (1985) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain: II. population dynamics and carbon cycling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis N, Hyman JM, Cushing JM (2008) Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through the sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model. Bull Math Biol 70(5):1272–1296

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cross WF, Benstead JP, Frost PC, Thomas SA (2005) Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives. Freshw Biol 50(11):1895–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ (1998) Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29(1):503–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Yang R, Humphrey AE (1975) Dynamic and steady state studies of phenol biodegradation in pure and mixed cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 17(8):1211–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhooge A, Govaerts W, Kuznetsov YA, Mestrom W, Riet A, Sautois B (2006) MATCONT and CL MATCONT: continuation toolboxes in matlab. Universiteit Gent, Belgium and Utrecht University, The Netherlands

  • Ekelund F, Rønn R (1994) Notes on protozoa in agricultural soil with emphasis on heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae and their ecology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 15(4):321–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel T (1975) The quantitative importance of the benthic microfauna of an arctic tundra pond. Hydrobiologia 46(4):445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel T, Harrison P (1976) The significance of bacterial grazing and mineral cycling for the decomposition of particulate detritus. In: Symposium of the British Ecological Society, pp 285–299

  • Goldman JC, Caron DA, Andersen OK, Dennett MR (1985) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain: I. Nitrogen dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habte M, Alexander M (1975) Protozoa as agents responsible for the decline of Xanthomonas campestris in soil. Appl Microbiol 29(2):159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert D, Elsworth R, Telling R (1956) The continuous culture of bacteria: a theoretical and experimental study. Microbiology 14(3):601–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessen DO, Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Urabe J (2013) Ecological stoichiometry: an elementary approach using basic principles. Limnol Oceanogr 58(6):2219–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt H, Cole C, Klein DA, Coleman DC (1977) A simulation model for the effect of predation on bacteria in continuous culture. Microb Ecol 3(4):259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L (2007) Negative selection effects suppress relationships between bacterial diversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecology 88(5):1075–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooi B, Boer M, Kooijman S (1997) Complex dynamic behaviour of autonomous microbial food chains. J Math Biol 36(1):24–40

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marine I (1986) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain: 111. Phosphorus dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinescu M, Dumitru M, Lăcătuşu AR (2009) Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in an artificial polluted soil. Res J Agricult Sci 41(2):157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod J (1949) The growth of bacterial cultures. Ann Rev Microbiol 3(1):371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet B (1984) Nutrition and feeding strategies in protozoa. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick A, Szilard L (1950) Description of the chemostat. Science 112(2920):715–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rønn R, McCaig AE, Griffiths BS, Prosser JI (2002) Impact of protozoan grazing on bacterial community structure in soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(12):6094–6105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salceanu PL (2011) Robust uniform persistence in discrete and continuous dynamical systems using lyapunov exponents. Math Biosci Eng MBE 8(3):807–825

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Hopkinson CS (1988) Trophic interactions within pelagic microbial communities: indications of feedback regulation of carbon flow. Hydrobiologia 159(1):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton P, Sainsbury D et al (1981) Introduction to bacteria. Wiley, Chichester

  • Smith HL, Waltman P (1995) The theory of the chemostat: dynamics of microbial competition, vol 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JD (1980) The role of protozoa in nutrient cycling and energy flow. In: Advances in microbial ecology. Springer, New York, pp 1–50

  • Wang H, Jiang L, Weitz JS (2009) Bacterivorous grazers facilitate organic matter decomposition: a stoichiometric modeling approach. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69(2):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Smith HL, Kuang Y, Elser JJ (2007) Dynamics of stoichiometric bacteria–algae interactions in the epilimnion. SIAM J Appl Math 68(2):503–522

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada

    Jude D. Kong & Hao Wang

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 204 Maxim Doucet Hall, Lafayette, LA, 70504, USA

    Paul Salceanu

Authors
  1. Jude D. Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Salceanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jude D. Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, J.D., Salceanu, P. & Wang, H. A stoichiometric organic matter decomposition model in a chemostat culture. J. Math. Biol. 76, 609–644 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1152-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1152-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation