Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 543–575 | Cite as

Bistability induced by generalist natural enemies can reverse pest invasions

  • Sten Madec
  • Jérôme Casas
  • Guy Barles
  • Christelle Suppo
Article
  • 139 Downloads

Abstract

Analytical modeling of predator–prey systems has shown that specialist natural enemies can slow, stop and even reverse pest invasions, assuming that the prey population displays a strong Allee effect in its growth. We aimed to formalize the conditions in which spatial biological control can be achieved by generalists, through an analytical approach based on reaction–diffusion equations. Using comparison principles, we obtain sufficient conditions for control and for invasion, based on scalar bistable partial differential equations. The ability of generalist predators to control prey populations with logistic growth lies in the bistable dynamics of the coupled system, rather than in the bistability of prey-only dynamics as observed for specialist predators attacking prey populations displaying Allee effects. As a consequence, prey control is predicted to be possible when space is considered in additional situations other than those identified without considering space. The reverse situation is also possible. None of these considerations apply to spatial predator–prey systems with specialist natural enemies.

Keywords

Reaction diffusion system Long time dynamics Traveling wave Invasion process Biological control Prey–predator interaction Generalist predator 

Mathematics Subject Classification

35B40 35K57 92D25 92D40 92B99 

References

  1. Alzahrani EO, Davidson FA, Dodds N (2012) Reversing invasion in bistable systems. J Math Biol 65:1101–1124MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Basnet K, Mukhopadhyay A (2014) Biocontrol potential of the lynx spider Oxyopes javanus (Araneae: Oxyopidae) against the tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera:Miridae). Int J Trop Insect Sci 34(4):232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braverman E, Kamrujjaman M, Korobenko L (2015) Competitive spatially distributed population dynamics models: does diversity in diffusion strategies promote coexistence? Math Biosci 264:63–73MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Boukal DS, Sabelis MW, Berec L (2007) How predator functional responses and Allee effects in prey affect the paradox of enrichment and population collapses. Theor Popul Biol 72:136–147CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai Y, Banerjee M, Kang Y, Wang W (2014) Spatiotemporal complexity in a predator–prey model with weak allee effects. Math Biosci Eng 11:1247–1274MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty S (2015) The influence of generalist predators in spatially extended predator–prey systems. Ecol Complex 23:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Roos AM, Mccauley E, Wilson WG (1991) Mobility versus density-limited predator–prey dynamics on different spatial scales. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 246(1316):117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Roos AM, Mccauley E, Wilson WG (1998) Pattern formation and the spatial scale of interaction between predators and their prey. Theor Popul Biol 53(2):108–130CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Du Y, Shi J (2007) Allee effect and bistability in a spatially heterogeneous predator–prey model. Trans Am Math Soc 359(9):4557–4593MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ducrot A, Langlais M (2012) A singular reaction–diffusion system modelling prey–predator interactions: invasion and co-extinction waves. J Differ Equ 253:502–532MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunbar SR (1984a) Traveling wave solutions of diffusive Lotka–Volterra equations. J Math Biol 17:11–32MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunbar SR (1984b) Traveling wave solutions of diffusive Lotka–Volterra equations: a heteroclinic connection in R4. Trans Am Math Soc 286:557–594MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Erbach A, Lutscher F, Seo G (2014) Bistability and limit cycles in generalist predator–prey dynamics. Ecol Complex 14:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fagan WF, Lewis MA, Neurbert MG, Pvd Driessche (2002) Invasion theory and biological control. Ecol Lett 5:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fife PC (1979) Long time behavior of solutions of bistable nonlinear diffusion equations. Arch Ration Mech Anal 70:31–46MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer RA (1937) The wave of advance of an advantageous gene. Ann Eugen 7:353–369Google Scholar
  17. Garnier J, Roques L, Hamel F (2012) Success rate of a biological invasion in terms of the spatial distribution of the founding population. Bull Math Biol 74(2):453–473MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Giovangigli V (1990) Nonadiabatic plane laminar flames and their singular limits. SIAM J Math Anal 21(5):1305–1325MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Hastings A (2000) Parasitoid spread: lessons for and from invasion biology. In: Hochberg ME, Ives AR (eds) Parasitoids population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 70–82Google Scholar
  20. Hoyle A, Bowers RG (2007) When is evolutionary branching in predator–prey systems possible with an explicit carrying capacity? Math Biosci 210:1–16MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang J, Lu G, Ruan S (2003) Existence of traveling wave solutions in a diffusive predator–prey model. J Math Biol 46:132–152MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang Y, Weng P (2013) Traveling waves for a diffusive predator–prey system with a general functional response. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 14:940–959MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Krivan V, Eisner J (2006) The effect of the Holling type II functional response on apparent competition. Theor Popul Biol 70:421–430CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolmogorov AN, Petrowskii I, Piscounov N (1937) Etude de l’équation de la diffusion avec croissance de la quantité de matiére et son application à un problème biologique. Mosc Univ Math Bull 1:1–25Google Scholar
  25. Lam KY, Ni WM (2012) Uniqueness and complete dynamics in heterogeneous competition–diffusion systems. SIAM J Appl Math 72:1695–1712MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Li WT, Wu SL (2008) Traveling waves in a diffusive predator-prey model with Holling type-III functional response. Chaos Solitons Fractals 37:476–486MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis MA, Maini PK, Petrovskii SV (2013) Dispersal, individual movement and spatial ecology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Li DS, Liao C, Zhang BX, Song ZW (2014) Biological control of insect pests in litchi orchards in China. Biol Control 68:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magal C, Cosner C, Ruan S, Casas J (2008) Control of invasive hosts by generalist parasitoids. Math Med Biol 25:1–20CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Mistro DC, Rodrigues LAD, Petrovskii S (2012) Spatiotemporal complexity of biological invasion in a space- and time-discrete predator–prey system with the strong Allee effect. Ecol Complex 9:16–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moffat CE, Lalonde RG, Ensing DJ, De Clerck-Floate RA, Grosskopf-Lachat G, Pither J (2013) Frequency-dependent host species use by a candidate biological control insect within its native European range. Biol Control 67:498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morozov A, Petrovskii S (2009) Excitable population dynamics, biological control failure, and spatiotemporal pattern formation in a model ecosystem. Bull Math Biol 71:863–887MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Morozov A, Petrovskii S (2013) Feeding on multiple sources: towards a universal parameterization of the functional response of a generalist predator allowing for switching. PLoS One 8(9):e74586. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen MR, Lewis MA (2001) How predation can slow, stop or reverse a prey invasion. Bull Math Biol 63:655–684MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Pimentel D (2011) Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Potapov A, Rajakaruna H (2013) Allee threshold and stochasticity in biological invasions: colonization time at low propagule pressure. J Theor Biol 337:1–14MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savage D, Renton M (2013) Requirements, design and implementation of a general model of biological invasion. Ecol Model 272:394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Leeuwen E, Jansen VAA, Bright PW (2007) How population dynamics shape the functional response in a one-predator–two-prey system. Ecology 88(6):1571–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Leeuwen R, Brannsrom A, Jansen VAA, Dieckmann U, Rossberg AG (2013) A generalized functional response for predators that switch between multiple prey species. J Theor Biol 328:89–98Google Scholar
  40. Volpert AI, Volpert VA, Volpert VA (1994) Traveling wave solutions of parabolic systems. American Mathematical Society, ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang W, Feng X, Chen X (2013) Biological invasion and coexistence in intraguild predation. J Appl Math 2013:12. doi:10.1155/2013/925141
  42. Xu Z, Weng P (2012) Traveling waves in a diffusive predator–prey model with general functional response. Electron J Differ Equ 197:1–13MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Ye GY, Xiao Q, Chen M, Chen X, Yuan Z, Stanley DW, Hu C (2014) Tea: biological control of insect and mite pests in China. Biol Control 68:73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sten Madec
    • 1
  • Jérôme Casas
    • 2
    • 3
  • Guy Barles
    • 1
  • Christelle Suppo
    • 2
  1. 1.LMPT, UMR CNRS 7350Université François-Rabelais de ToursToursFrance
  2. 2.IRBI, UMR CNRS 7261Université François-Rabelais de ToursToursFrance
  3. 3.Institut Universitaire de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations