Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 465–489 | Cite as

The effect of competition on the neutral intraspecific diversity of invasive species

  • L. RoquesEmail author
  • Y. Hosono
  • O. Bonnefon
  • T. Boivin
Article

Abstract

This paper deals with the effect of interspecific competition on the dynamics of neutral genetic diversity in a range-expanding population. The spread of an invasive species in an environment already hosting a resident competitor is described by a traveling wave solution with minimal speed, \(u(t,x)=U(x - c^* \, t)\), of a diffusive Lotka–Volterra competition model. The description of the dynamics of neutral genetic fractions in this wave is based on a decomposition of the wave into several components, as proposed by Roques et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(23):8828–8833, 2012). Our analytical results reveal that the wave can be either the pulled type, corresponding to strong erosion of the diversity, or the pushed type, corresponding to maintenance of the initial diversity. The pulled/pushed nature of the wave depends on the linear or nonlinear nature of the speed \(c^*\). Our results show that, for sufficiently strong competition, the speed is nonlinear, and therefore all of the genetic diversity in the invasive population is maintained. Conversely, in the absence of competition, or when competition is mild, the speed is linear, which means that only the furthest forward fraction in the initial invasive population eventually remains in the colonization front. Our numerical results also show that the sufficient conditions of Lewis et al. (J Math Biol 45(3):219–233, 2002) and Huang (J Dyn Differ Equ 22(2):285–297, 2010) for the linearity of the speed \(c^*\) can still be improved, and they show that nonlinear speeds occur across a wide region of the parameter space, providing a counterpoint to recent analytical results suggesting that nonlinear speeds only occur in certain limiting cases.

Keywords

Lotka–Volterra Competition Genetic diversity  Pulled and pushed waves Nonlinear speed 

Mathematics Subject Classification

35C07 35Q92 35K45 35K55 35K57 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement N. 321186—ReaDi—Reaction–Diffusion Equations, Propagation and Modelling, and from the French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche, within the ANR-10-INTB-1705-04-MACBI project. The second author was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22540156 and the ReaDiLab (LIA 197, CNRS).

References

  1. Agashe D, Falk JJ, Bolnick DI (2011) Effects of founding genetic variation on adaptation to a novel resource. Evolution 65(9):2481–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson DG, Weinberger HG (1975) Nonlinear diffusion in population genetics, combustion and nerve propagation. In: Partial differential equations and related topics, Volume 446 of Lectures Notes Math, pp 5–49. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson DG, Weinberger HG (1978) Multidimensional nonlinear diffusion arising in population genetics. Adv Math 30(1):33–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austerlitz F, Garnier-Géré PH (2003) Modelling the impact of colonisation on genetic diversity and differentiation of forest trees: interaction of life cycle, pollen flow and seed long-distance dispersal. Heredity 90(4):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon PH, Godelle B (2000) Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154(3):1309–1321Google Scholar
  6. Bonnefon O, Coville J, Garnier J, Roques L (2014) Inside dynamics of solutions of integro-differential equations. Disc Cont Dyn Systems B, in pressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnefon O, Garnier J, Hamel F, Roques L (2013) Inside dynamics of delayed traveling waves. Math Model Nat Phenom 8:44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridle JR, Vines TH (2007) Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol Evol 22(3):140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton OJ, Phillips BL, Travis JM (2010) Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecol Lett 13(10):1210–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crooks ECM (2003) Travelling fronts for monostable reaction–diffusion systems with gradient-dependence. Adv Diff Equ 8:279–314Google Scholar
  11. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17(1):431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17(5):1170–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Excoffier L, Foll M, Petit RJ (2009) Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40(1):481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L, Ray N (2008) Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends Ecol Evol 23(7):347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Facon B, Hufbauer RA, Tayeh A, Loiseau A, Lombaert E, Vitalis R, Guillemaud T, Lundgren JG, Estoup A (2011) Inbreeding depression is purged in the invasive insect Harmonia axyridis. Curr Biol 21(5):424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fayard J, Klein EK, Lefèvre F (2009) Long distance dispersal and the fate of a gene from the colonization front. J Evol Biol 22(11):2171–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fife PC, McLeod J (1977) The approach of solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations to traveling front solutions. Arch Ration Mech Anal 65(1):335–361Google Scholar
  18. Garnier J, Giletti T, Hamel F, Roques L (2012) Inside dynamics of pulled and pushed fronts. J Math Pures Appl 98:428–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garnier J, Lewis MA (2014) Expansion under climate change: the genetic consequences. PreprintGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaston KJ (2009) Geographic range limits of species. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276(1661):1391–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo J-S, Liang X (2011) The minimal speed of traveling fronts for the Lotka–Volterra competition system. J Dyn Diff Equ 23(2):353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo J-S, Wu C-H (2012) Recent developments on wave propagation in 2-species competition systems. Disc Cont Dyn Systems B 17(8):2713–2724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hadeler KP, Rothe F (1975) Travelling fronts in nonlinear diffusion equations. J Math Biol 2(3):251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallatschek O, Nelson DR (2008) Gene surfing in expanding populations. Theor Popul Biol 73:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hecht F (2012) New development in freefem++. J Numer Math 20(3–4):251–265Google Scholar
  26. Henry D (1981) Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations. Number 840. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Holzer M, Scheel A (2012) A slow pushed front in a Lotka–Volterra competition model. Nonlinearity 25(7):2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hosono Y (1998) The minimal speed of traveling fronts for a diffusive Lotka–Volterra competition model. Bull Math Biol 60(3):435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosono Y (2003) Traveling waves for a diffusive Lotka–Volterra competition model I: singular perturbations. Disc Cont Dyn Systems B 3:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang W (2010) Problem on minimum wave speed for a Lotka–Volterra reaction–diffusion competition model. J Dyn Differ Equ 22(2):285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang W, Han M (2011) Non-linear determinacy of minimum wave speed for a Lotka–Volterra competition model. J Diff Equ 251(6):1549–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibrahim KM, Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1996) Spatial patterns of genetic variation generated by different forms of dispersal during range expansion. Heredity 77(3):282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kan-On Y (1995) Parameter dependence of propagation speed of travelling waves for competition–diffusion equations. SIAM J Math Anal 26(2):340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kan-On Y (1997) Fisher wave for the Lotka–Volterra competition model with diffusion. Nonlinear Anal Theor 28:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kan-On Y, Fang Q (1996) Stability of monotone travelling waves for competition–diffusion equations. Jpn J Ind Appl Math 13(2):343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolmogorov AN, Petrovsky IG, Piskunov NS (1937) Étude de l’équation de la diffusion avec croissance de la quantité de matière et son application à un problème biologique. Bull Univ État Moscou Sér Int A 1:1–26Google Scholar
  37. Lewis MA, Li B, Weinberger HF (2002) Spreading speed and linear determinacy for two-species competition models. J Math Biol 45(3):219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li B, Weinberger HF, Lewis MA (2005) Spreading speeds as slowest wave speeds for cooperative systems. Math Biosci 196(1):82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mollison D (1977) Spatial contact models for ecological and epidemic spread. J R Stat Soc B 39:283–326Google Scholar
  40. Morita Y, Tachibana K (2009) An entire solution to the Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion equations. SIAM J Math Anal 40(6):2217–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray JD (2002) Mathematical Biology. Third edition, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics 17. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Okubo A, Maini PK, Williamson MH, Murray JD (1989) On the spatial spread of the grey squirrel in britain. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 238(1291):113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421(6918):37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pluess AR (2011) Pursuing glacier retreat: genetic structure of a rapidly expanding larix decidua population. Mol Ecol 20(3):473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roques A, Rabitsch W, Rasplus J-Y, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Nentwig W, Kenis M (2009) Alien terrestrial invertebrates of europe. In: Handbook of alien species in Europe, pp 63–79. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Roques L, Garnier J, Hamel F, Klein EK (2012) Allee effect promotes diversity in traveling waves of colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(23):8828–8833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ (2009) Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:415–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17(4):170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stokes AN (1976) On two types of moving front in quasilinear diffusion. Math Biosci 31:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uchiyama K (1978) The behaviour of solutions of some non-linear diffusion equations for large time. J Math Kyoto Univ 18(3):453–508Google Scholar
  51. Vlad MO, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Ross J (2004) Enhanced (hydrodynamic) transport induced by population growth in reaction–diffusion systems with application to population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(28):10249–10253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weinberger HF, Lewis MA, Li B (2002) Analysis of linear determinacy for spread in cooperative models. J Math Biol 45(3):183–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson JR, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRA, UR 546 Biostatistique et Processus SpatiauxAvignonFrance
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsKyoto Sangyo UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.INRA, UR 629 Ecologie des Forêts MéditerranéennesAvignonFrance

Personalised recommendations